Suites données aux recommandations du comité et du Conseil d’administration - Rapport No. 395, Juin 2021

Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body

1. 50. The Committee last examined this case, which concerns alleged anti-union practices by Banco Falabella Peru (the bank) against the Banco Falabella Workers’ Trade Union (SUTBAF) and its members, at its March 2014 meeting [see 371th Report, paras 118–120]. On that occasion, after noting with interest that the SUTBAF’s union registration remained fully in force and that the organization had signed a collective agreement with the bank, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the new ruling on the alleged anti-union dismissal of Mr Hugo Rey Douglas (Mr Rey).
2. 51. In this respect, the Committee notes that, in communications dated 21 August 2014, 21 June 2017 and 3 August 2018, the Government reports that the Twenty-Sixth Temporary Specialized Labour Court of Lima ordered in 2016 that the proceedings initiated by Mr Rey seeking the annulment of his dismissal (Case No. 1395-2011) be closed, as he had dropped the appeal lodged against Decision No. 32 of 2015, by which the court had declared his claim unfounded.
3. 52. Furthermore, the Committee has received no information from the complainant organization, the Single Confederation of Workers of Peru, since its last examination of the case. In these circumstances, and taking due note of the information provided by the Government, the Committee considers this case closed and will not pursue its examination.