Suites données aux recommandations du comité et du Conseil d’administration - Rapport No. 382, Juin 2017

Effect given to the recommendations of the Committee and the Governing Body

1. 131. The Committee last examined this case at its March 2014 session [see 371st Report, paras 89–91]. On that occasion, it requested the Government to inform it of the outcome of the ongoing judicial review and, in light of the confirmation on appeal of his wrongful dismissal, to ensure that Mr Rázuri was reinstated in his post pending the final judgment.
2. 132. As follow-up to the case, in a communication dated 2 May 2014, the Government reports that: (i) the Standing Chamber of Constitutional and Social Law of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic has declared the judicial review inadmissible; and (ii) on 22 April 2014, the enterprise in question reported that it was awaiting official notification from the judge in the judicial proceedings concerning Mr Rázuri’s dismissal and would implement the court’s judgment without delay.
3. 133. Taking due note of this information, having received no additional information from the complainant and on the understanding that since the court’s ruling that Mr Rázuri had been wrongfully dismissed has been upheld, he has been reinstated, the Committee will not pursue its examination of this case.