ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Observation (CEACR) - adoptée 2022, publiée 111ème session CIT (2023)

Kenya

Convention (n° 81) sur l'inspection du travail, 1947 (Ratification: 1964)
Convention (n° 129) sur l'inspection du travail (agriculture), 1969 (Ratification: 1979)

Autre commentaire sur C081

Observation
  1. 2022
  2. 2014
  3. 2012
  4. 2011
  5. 2009
  6. 2008
  7. 2006
  8. 2003
  9. 1999
Demande directe
  1. 2022
  2. 2014
  3. 2012
  4. 2008
  5. 2002
  6. 1999
  7. 1997
  8. 1995
  9. 1992
  10. 1990

Other comments on C129

Observation
  1. 2022
  2. 2012
  3. 2011
  4. 2010
  5. 2008
  6. 2006
  7. 2003
  8. 2001
Demande directe
  1. 2022
  2. 2014
  3. 2012
  4. 1999
  5. 1997
  6. 1995
  7. 1992

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.
Articles 3(1), 4 and 5(b) of Convention No. 81 and Articles. 6(1), 7 and 13 of Convention No. 129. Structure of the labour inspection system, cooperation between inspection services and supervision and control by a central authority.In its previous comments, the Committee noted the absence of an individual or a department with oversight responsibility for the various inspection activities, as well as the limited cooperation between the two inspection systems under the Department of Labour (DOL) and the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH). In its report, the Government indicates that the two inspectorate services under the DOL and the DOSH were placed under a common oversight authority, the State Department of Labour, which is also the central authority for purposes of reporting. The Committee also notes that the Government refers to the development of more measures to centralise supervision and control of both departments but does not indicate whether the post of chief inspector has been established and filled. Therefore, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on additional measures taken toward the centralization of supervision and control of the two inspection systems, including the possibility of placing labour inspection under the responsibility of one chief inspector who would be responsible for the overall coordination of the Ministry of Labour’s inspection services. In this respect, it requests the Government to indicate whether the post of chief inspector has been established and filled.
Articles 10, 11 and 16 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 14,15 and 21 of Convention No. 129. Lack of human and material resources and appropriate means of transport. Efficiency of inspections. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that the resource constraints in budgetary allocation led to a lack of inspectorate staff, lack of material resources, including facilities, and lack of transport, which affected the efficient delivery of labour inspection services, including in the agricultural sector. It further noted that the civil service was undergoing a reform and that subsequently, understaffed and under-resourced departments would benefit from the deployment of personnel from overstaffed agencies. In its report, the Government indicates that it has put in place measures to boost institutional capacity of the inspectorates to enhance resource allocation and effective enforcement of laws. The Committee notes that 40 officers were employed by the Ministry at the entry level of its inspectorate service in both the DOL and the DOSH in 2017. It further notes that the inspectorate staff has designated authorized officers under section 35 of the Labour Institutions Act (powers of labour officer), but the Government does not indicate the number of the nominated officers and the time of their appointment. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the geographical distribution of the inspectorate staff to all 47 counties aims at ensuring adequate representation and coverage of all sectors. The Government indicates that the labour inspectorate staff are provided with operational offices fully equipped for administration purposes and for the effective performance of their duties. Furthermore, according to the Government, staff reimbursements are adequately provided on instances where the labour inspectors need to use their own funds for the performance of their duties. However, the Committee notes that due to continued funding problems, the challenge remains of inadequate transport, in terms of required vehicles that would allow for movement to the various vast regions of the country. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged, including within the framework of the civil service reform, to ensure that the number of labour inspectors is sufficient to secure the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate. It requests the Government to provide detailed information on the number of labour inspectors working for the DOL and the DOSH, indicating their years of experience, areas of specialization, and geographical distribution. Noting the funding constraints, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the steps taken or envisaged to ensure that the labour inspectorate is provided with the material resources and transport facilities necessary for the effective performance of their duties.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer