Observation (CEACR) - adoptée 2021, publiée 110ème session CIT (2022)

Repetition

The Committee notes the observations of the Confederation of Public and Private Sector Workers (CTSP) received on 1 September 2019, in which it reiterated its observations of 2016, 2017 and 2018 and adds that the situation has deteriorated.

Articles 3, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of the Convention. Discharge of primary duties of the labour inspectorate. Appropriate sanctions. In its previous comment, the Committee noted the Government’s indications concerning the obstacles faced in applying the Convention in practice, particularly the inadequate numbers of labour inspectors, and requested the Government to supply detailed information together with statistics on the planning and implementation of systematic inspections throughout the country, including in the export processing zones, and also their results. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government concerning the planning and implementation of inspection visits in two of the ten departments in the country in several activity sectors, including: (i) in the western department: 64 inspections (32 initial inspections and 32 catch-up inspections) conducted in 2017; 16 inspections (11 of which in the textile industry), 31 unannounced inspection visits in enterprises and 24 investigations, conducted in 2018; and 42 visits planned and ten advice services carried out in 2019; and (ii) in the north-eastern department, ten initial inspections and ten follow-up inspections were conducted in 2018. The Government indicates that the main objective of labour inspection over this period has been redressing the inconformity identified, rather than imposing penalties. The Committee also notes that the CTSP in its observations indicates that inspectors do not provide technical advice to workers and employers, but limit themselves to calculating the statutory benefits due in disputes between employers and workers. The CTSP also indicates that there are no statistics on labour inspection in the country; to its knowledge, there is no planning or implementation of systematic inspections throughout the country; and, in practice, labour inspection was carried out only in the textile industry. While duly noting the progress achieved since 2017 by the labour inspectorate in the country, particularly concerning the planning and implementation of visits in two of the ten departments in the country, the Committee requests the Government to strengthen its efforts to progressively expand the planning and conducting of inspection visits to all regions and all economic sectors of the country. The Committee also requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken in this regard, including the statistics concerning the number of inspections planned and conducted, disaggregated by sector, along with details of the results of these visits, including the warnings issues, legal procedures brought or recommended, and penalties imposed and applied. The Committee also requests the Government to ensure that, during their inspection visits, the inspectors perform their primary functions in conformity with Article 3 of the Convention.

Articles 6, 10 and 11. Human and material resources available to the labour inspectorate. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in reply to its previous comments that: (i) between 2014 and 2017, thanks the project to build the capacities of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Labour (ILO/MAST), piloted by the ILO, a team was established of 20 officials, 12 of whom are inspectors in the field and eight are trainers; (ii) in 2018, means of transport (six motorcycles and a car) were provided to certain regional MAST offices and that efforts are envisaged to equip all inspection services with the means necessary to guarantee labour inspection in workplaces; and (iii) it planned to upwardly revise the salaries of labour inspectors in the same way as all other inspectors of the public administration. The Committee notes the CTSP’s observations, according to which the Government has not made an effort to change the status of labour inspectors in order to provide them with better employment conditions, such as a decent salary, a guarantee of productive employment and social advantages, which could jeopardize the independence of inspectors. The Committee requests the Government to pursue its efforts towards progressively increasing the number of inspectors and the material means placed at their disposal to enable them to effectively discharge the functions of the inspection services. The Committee also requests the Government to take the necessary measures to improve the conditions of service of the inspectors, including increasing their remuneration. In this regard, it requests the Government to provide information on the salary scales and labour inspectors’ career prospects, compared with public servants who carry out similar functions within other government services, such as tax inspectors and the police.

Articles 6, 7(1) and Article 15(a). Recruitment of inspectors. Prohibition from having any direct or indirect interest in the undertakings. In its previous comment, the Committee noted that, in its observations, the CTSP indicated that recruitment of labour inspectors was carried out on the basis of clientelism. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, to ensure full application of sections 47 to 75 of the Decree of 17 May 2005, revising the general public service regulations, which regulate the recruitment procedure of public service agents, including labour inspectors, an administrative structure has been established for this purpose, entitled the Office for Human Resources Management (OMRH). The Committee also notes that the CTSP reiterated in 2019 its previous observations on this matter and indicated the further deterioration of the labour inspectorate’s independence vis-à-vis employers. The Committee requests the Government to ensure that labour inspectors are recruited with sole regard to their qualifications for the performance of their duties and that their status and conditions of service are such that they are independent of changes of government and of improper external influences in conformity with Articles 6 and 7(1) of the Convention. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the composition of the OMRH as well as on its prerogatives.