ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Demande directe (CEACR) - adoptée 2019, publiée 109ème session CIT (2021)

Convention (n° 1) sur la durée du travail (industrie), 1919 - Venezuela (République bolivarienne du) (Ratification: 1944)

Autre commentaire sur C001

Observation
  1. 2008
  2. 2004
  3. 1999
Demande directe
  1. 2020
  2. 2019
  3. 2013
  4. 2008
  5. 2004
  6. 1995
Réponses reçues aux questions soulevées dans une demande directe qui ne donnent pas lieu à d’autres commentaires
  1. 2021

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

Article 2(b) of the Convention. Regular averaging of hours of work. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that section 175(4) of the Basic Labour Act (LOTTT) provides that collective agreements may establish regular averaging schemes, as long as the following conditions are respected: (i) daily limit of 11 hours; (ii) an average of 40 hours per week calculated over eight weeks; and (iii) the workers concerned must enjoy two consecutive days of rest every week. In this regard, the Committee recalls that the Convention: (i) allows for variations in the duration of daily hours as long as the 48-hour weekly limit is respected (the reference period is one week); (ii) sets a daily limit of nine hours for this variation; and (iii) requires this variation to be approved by the competent authority or by agreement between workers’ and employers’ organizations (procedural safeguards). The Committee observes that these procedural safeguards are respected in section 175(4) which provides that the averaging scheme may be established by collective agreements. It also observes that the scheme foreseen in section 175(4) is based on an average of 40 hours per week calculated over eight weeks (reference period). While acknowledging that the weekly average of 40 hours is more favourable than that foreseen in the Convention (48 hours), the Committee notes that the averaging scheme in question is not fully in conformity with the Convention, given that it does not respect the daily limit of nine hours nor the reference period (one week). The Committee is therefore bound to request the Government to review the provisions of section 175(4) of the LOTTT, in light of the obligations under Article 2(b) of the Convention, in consultation with the social partners. It also requests the Government to provide information on the application of section 175(4) in practice, including the number of collective agreements adopted under this provision and the maximum daily limit that they set.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer