ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Demande directe (CEACR) - adoptée 2015, publiée 105ème session CIT (2016)

Convention (n° 29) sur le travail forcé, 1930 - Nicaragua (Ratification: 1934)

Autre commentaire sur C029

Observation
  1. 1994

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

Referring to its previous comments on the action of the labour inspectorate to end situations in which workers can be obliged to perform overtime work beyond the legal limits, the Committee notes that, in its report, the Government indicates that the labour inspectorate has sufficient means to carry out inspections to ensure respect for workers’ rights in all the sectors of the economy and can therefore identify and stop situations that could constitute violations of fundamental workers’ rights.
The Committee also notes that the Government provides no information on the other matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
Articles 1(1), 2(1) and 25 of the Convention. Trafficking in persons. In its previous comments, the Committee referred to section 182 of the Penal Code, which defines the elements which constitute trafficking in persons and provides for prison sentences of between seven to ten years, and requested the Government to provide information on the judicial proceedings initiated on the basis of that provision and on the steps taken to protect victims of trafficking.
The Committee notes that, in its report, the Government provides information on the role played by the national police in combating trafficking in persons and on the steps taken in cooperation with the Public Prosecutor, the Office of the Attorney General, the judicial system, NGOs and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) to prevent and combat trafficking. The public at large has been informed in detail of the activities of these institutions particularly through public information campaigns, press releases and reports on trafficking in persons. The Government refers also to the periodic assessments by the National Coalition against Trafficking in Persons on the implementation of workplans and on government commitments to combat trafficking in persons. With regard to the protection afforded to victims of trafficking, the Government states that, when identified, the victims are not arrested but are assisted by the General Directorate of Migrants and Non-Nationals to regularize their migrant status or to arrange for their repatriation, and that they are put in touch with the Ministry for the Family, which coordinates the assistance and care of victims of trafficking received throughout the period of investigation. Moreover, Act No. 735 of 2010 on the prevention, investigation and prosecution of organized crime, which includes trafficking in persons as an organized crime, contains provisions aimed at protecting the victims and witnesses of such crimes so that they can testify. Finally, the Government provides statistics on the 11 judicial proceedings for trafficking initiated under section 182 of the Penal Code for the years 2008–11, four of which resulted in prison sentences being imposed on perpetrators.
The Committee observes that the information provided by the Government bears witness to the steps taken to combat trafficking in persons and hopes that it will continue taking action in this respect. It therefore requests the Government to provide information on the activities of the National Coalition against Trafficking of Persons, on the regular assessments of the anti-trafficking strategy made by the Coalition and on the follow-up action taken. It also request the Government to indicate the measures taken to increase the resources and capacity of law enforcement bodies (labour inspectorate, police, public prosecutor and the courts) as well as to ensure better protection of victims and enable them to assert their rights. Finally, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the judicial procedures initiated under section 182 of the Penal Code and to indicate the sanctions applied.
Article 2(2)(c). Sentences of community work. In its previous comments, the Committee asked the Government to provide examples of work carried out in the form of penal labour for the benefit of the community as provided for in section 62 of the Penal Code, together with a list of bodies authorized to benefit from such labour. The Committee notes that the Government states in its report that no such had been elaborated. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether there have been instances of labour in the interest of the community being imposed by the courts and, if so, to provide examples of the work carried out by people so sentenced as well as of private entities for which such work is carried out.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer