ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Demande directe (CEACR) - adoptée 2009, publiée 99ème session CIT (2010)

Convention (n° 105) sur l'abolition du travail forcé, 1957 - Mali (Ratification: 1962)

Autre commentaire sur C105

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

Article 1, subparagraph b, of the Convention. Labour or services exacted for purposes of economic development. In its previous comments, the Committee drew the Government’s attention to the fact that section L6(2) of the Labour Code was not in conformity with the Convention. According to this provision, “work required in the public interest by legislative provisions on … participation in development” is not considered to be forced or compulsory labour. In accordance with Article 1(b) of the Convention, the State undertakes to suppress and not to make use of any form of forced or compulsory labour as a method of mobilizing and using labour for purposes of economic development. In previous reports, the Government indicated that the provisions of section L6(2) of the Labour Code had never been applied in practice and that no decree or order had been adopted to give effect to them. It indicated that it would take steps, in the context of a review of the Labour Code, to ensure compliance with the Convention on this point.

The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its latest report that the provisions concerned have been removed from the draft revision of the Labour Code. The Committee trusts that the draft will be adopted in the near future and that the Government will be able to supply information on the progress made in its next report. Please provide a copy of the text amending the Labour Code.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer