ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards

Observación (CEACR) - Adopción: 2021, Publicación: 110ª reunión CIT (2022)

Convenio sobre el trabajo forzoso, 1930 (núm. 29) - Austria (Ratificación : 1960)
Protocolo de 2014 relativo al Convenio sobre el trabajo forzoso, 1930 - Austria (Ratificación : 2019)

Otros comentarios sobre C029

Observación
  1. 2021
  2. 2017
  3. 2014
  4. 2011
  5. 2008
  6. 2004
  7. 2001
  8. 1998
  9. 1996
  10. 1994
  11. 1992
  12. 1990
Solicitud directa
  1. 2021
  2. 2017
  3. 2014

Visualizar en: Francés - EspañolVisualizar todo

Articles 1(1), 2(1) and 2(2)(c) of the Convention. Work of prisoners for private companies. For a number of years, the Committee has been examining the situation of prisoners who are obliged to work, without their formal consent, in workshops run by private enterprises within state prisons, pursuant to section 46(3) of the Law on the execution of sentences. The Committee noted the indication of the Government that the prisoners working in private-run workshops are supervised only by prison staff and paid by the prison. The Committee repeatedly pointed out that the practice followed in this regard corresponds in all aspects to what is expressly prohibited by Article 2(2)(c), namely, that a person is “hired to” private contractors. It noted, in particular, that the term hired to covers not only situations where prisoners are “employed” by the private company, but also situations where prisoners are hired to private enterprises but remain under the authority and control of the prison administration.
The Committee further noted the Government’s repeated indication that prisoners working for private contractors benefit from rights and conditions of work that are similar to those guaranteed in a free labour relationship. Although the Government indicated that it has stipulated that inmates working in privately run workplaces inside the prison must also provide freely given and informed consent, the Committee noted that section 46(3) of the Law on the execution of sentences was not amended to this effect. Moreover, it noted that according to a document named “Correctional services in Austria” issued by the Ministry of Justice in August 2016, convicts and prisoners subject to precautionary measures of placement, who are fit to work, are obligated by law to take over work. Prisoners who are required to work have to do the work that has been allocated to them, except for work which might endanger their life or subject them to serious health hazards. Moreover, 75 per cent of work remuneration is withheld as contribution to prison costs indicating that on average, prisoners receive €5 per day, after deduction of their contribution to prison costs and of their contribution towards unemployment insurance. The Committee requested the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that section 46(3) of the Law on the execution of sentences is revised, in order to bring it into conformity with the requirements of the Convention as well as the indicated practice by the Government.
The Committee notes the Government’s information in its report that there have not been any legislative amendments regarding the implementation of the Convention. However, there has been an increase in the rate of pay for those serving custodial sentences in line with the 61.31 per cent increase in the negotiated standard wage index. The Committee also notes the Government’s reference to section 49(3) of the Law on the execution of sentences which guarantees the protection of life, health and safety of the workers as well as other social security benefits, rights and employment conditions that are applicable to prisoners working for private enterprises. Moreover, the Government states that although, the institutions involved in the implementation of custodial sentences may enter into agreements with commercial enterprises on the employment of prisoners, such enterprises have no disciplinary authority over the prisoners and are not permitted to exercise any kind of direct or indirect coercion or issue any orders to the prisoners. The Government further provides examples of private enterprises that offer special professional training and excellent working conditions with additional payments which is on high demand among inmates.
The Government considers that the work prisoners do for private enterprises is given legal status with rights and employment conditions attached which are similar to those of employment outside prisons. It reiterates that, in practice, the free and well-informed consent is obtained from the inmates to work in privately run workshops within the prison premises. It therefore considers that no revision of section 46(3) of the Law on the execution of sentences is required.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government does not envisage taking any measures to legislate and give legal recognition to this point nor has it taken any measures to revise section 46(3) of the the Law on the execution of sentences according to which prisoners are obliged to work, in workshops run by private enterprises without any reference to their consent. The Committee recalls that, by virtue of Article 2(2) of the Convention, the compulsory labour of convicted persons is excluded from the scope of the Convention, provided that it is “carried out under the supervision and control of a public authority” and that such persons are not “hired to or placed at the disposal of private individuals, companies or associations”. These two conditions are equally important and apply cumulatively: the fact that the prisoner remains at all times under the supervision and control of a public authority does not itself dispense the Government from fulfilling the second condition, namely that the person is not hired to or placed at the disposal of private undertakings. If either of the two conditions is not observed, compulsory labour exacted from convicted persons under these circumstances is prohibited by virtue of Article 1(1) of the Convention. The Committee has nevertheless considered that work by prisoners for private enterprises can be held compatible with the requirement of the Convention, if such work is performed by prisoners under a “free employment relationship”, as referred to by the Government. In such circumstances, the prisoners concerned must offer themselves voluntarily, without being subjected to pressure or the menace of any penalty, by giving their free, formal and informed consent to work for private enterprises in law and in practice. The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that section 46(3) of the Law on the execution of sentences is revised, in order to bring it into conformity with the requirements of the Convention and the indicated practice. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the number of prisoners working in privately run workplaces inside prison premises. Noting that institutions involved in the implementation of custodial sentences may enter into agreements with commercial enterprises on the employment of prisoners and that such enterprises have no disciplinary authority over the prisoners, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the manner in which the prison authorities exercise control and, if appropriate, discipline on prisoners engaged in work benefiting commercial enterprises. The Committee further requests the Government to indicate the circumstances in practice of what is characterized as free and well-informed consent of the prisoners and to indicate whether their refusal to carry out such work is subject to disciplinary sanctions.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer