Allegations: The complainant alleges that the accreditation of the Coordinating
Center of Workers’ Representatives (CCR) as the workers’ delegation of the Islamic Republic
of Iran to the International Labour Conference is inconsistent with the requirements of the
ILO Constitution, as the organization is unknown to the complainant and to independent
workers’ groups within the country
- 570. The Committee last examined this case at its November 2012 meeting,
when it presented an interim report to the Governing Body [see 365th Report, paras
1089–1100, approved by the Governing Body at its 316th Session (November 2012)].
- 571. By a communication dated 13 October 2013, the Government forwarded a
copy of the proposed amendments to the Labour Code and a copy of the by-laws concerning
the formation, scope of duties, powers and the manner of function of trade unions and
relevant societies.
- 572. The Islamic Republic of Iran has not ratified the Freedom of
Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), nor the
Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98).
A. Previous examination of the case
A. Previous examination of the case- 573. In its previous examination of the case, the Committee made the
following recommendations [see 365th Report, para. 1100]:
- (a)
The Committee expects that the proposed draft amendments to the Labour Law will be
in full conformity with the principles of freedom of association and would allow for
trade union pluralism and strongly urges the Government to transmit a copy thereof
without delay so that it may examine their conformity with freedom of association
principles.
- (b) The Committee regrets that the Government
has not provided a copy of the amended Code of Practice on the Formation, Scope of
Duties, Authorities and Method of Performance of Trade Unions and Related
Associations, despite its previous request, and urges the Government to do so
without delay.
B. The Committee’s conclusions
B. The Committee’s conclusions- 574. The Committee recalls that this case, referred to it by the
International Labour Conference in June 2010 upon a proposal of the Credentials
Committee, concerns the issue of organizational monopoly imposed by the legislation and
genuine representation of workers in practice. In particular, the Committee recalls that
on several occasions it has requested the Government to amend article 131 of the Labour
Law (1990), enshrining organizational monopoly, so as to ensure that the legislation
allows for trade union pluralism. The Committee notes that in the framework of Case No.
2508, the Government forwards a copy of the draft amendments to the Labour Law which
were submitted to Parliament on 2 December 2012. The Government explains that the text
of the proposed amendments is being meticulously examined by various special committees
of Parliament. Upon their final examination, the proposed bill will be submitted to
Parliament for final approval. The Government also indicates that the draft amendments
are the fruit of long and laborious consultations initiated by the Ministry of
Cooperatives, Labour and Social Welfare, the Iranian Confederation of Employers’
Associations and the three most representatives workers’ confederations, including the
Confederation of Workers’ Trade Unions, the High Council of Workers’ Representatives and
the Confederation of the Islamic Labour Councils. The results of the social partners’
deliberations are duly incorporated in the proposed amendments. The Government requests
the Committee, in the context of ILO technical cooperation, to make its comments on the
draft so as to ensure that it is in full compliance with the respective ILO
instruments.
- 575. With regard to the draft amendments to the Labour Law, the Committee
notes that, while section 131 would appear to promote workplace pluralism, as previously
requested by the Committee, its accompanying Note 3 refers to a singular higher level
organization of workers, namely the Confederation of the Workers’ Trade Union. The
Committee further notes that, according to the proposed wording of section 135, the
establishment of Islamic labour councils comprising representatives of workers,
employers and representatives of management is mandatory in work units with more than 35
employees. It is not clear, however, how such councils will interact with workers’ trade
unions active at the same unit.
- 576. The Committee further notes a copy of the by-laws concerning the
formation, scope of duties, powers and the manner of function of trade unions and
relevant societies (2006), adopted pursuant to section 131 of the Labour Law in force,
section 15 of which currently provides that “it is not permissible to register two
similar organizations in one trade or industry in a common geographical area”. The
Committee understands, however, that once the new amendments to the Labour Law are
adopted, these by-laws will also be modified. It requests the Government to take the
necessary steps without delay and to keep it informed in this regard.
- 577. Indeed, the Committee notes that several sections of the proposed
amendments to the Labour Law refer to regulations which would need to be prepared by the
High Labour Council and approved by the Minister of Cooperatives, Labour and Social
Welfare or the Council of Ministers, as the case may be, which would regulate in detail
such subject matters as: the manner of formation, scope of duties and powers and
performance of workers’ and employers’ organizations and confederations, election,
formation, scope of duties and powers of workers’ representatives in workshops and the
relevant assemblies, as well as election of representatives of employers and workers in
domestic and international assemblies (pursuant to section 131, Note 5, of the Labour
Law); supervision of activities and investigation of infringements by workers’ and
employers’ organizations and by the board of director members or inspectors (pursuant to
section 131, Note 6, of the Labour Law); establishment of the Islamic Labour Council
(pursuant to section 135 of the Labour Law); the right to protest (pursuant to section
142bis of the Labour Law); establishment of and procedures relating to conciliation
councils (pursuant to section 164 of the Labour Law), etc. It therefore appears that
various components of freedom of association will be regulated through additional
specific by-laws. It is thus not clear, at the present stage, to what extent the Labour
Law and the accompanying regulations will guarantee, in law and in practice, the right
of workers to come together and form organizations of their own choosing, independently
and with structures which permit their members to elect their own officers, draw up and
adopt their by-laws, organize their administration and activities and formulate their
programmes in the defence of workers’ interests without interference from the public
authorities.
- 578. The Committee welcomes the Government’s indicated intention to
ensure that the amended Labour Law is in conformity with the relevant ILO instruments
and considers that ILO technical assistance in this respect could help the Government
and its social partners in this endeavour. It therefore encourages the Government to
accept the technical assistance of the Office and expects that the legislation and
accompanying regulations will be effectively amended without delay so as to bring them
into full conformity with the principles of freedom of association and will allow for
trade union pluralism at all levels. It requests the Government to keep it informed of
the status of the labour law reform.
The Committee’s recommendation
The Committee’s recommendation- 579. In the light of its foregoing conclusions, the Committee invites the
Governing Body to approve the following recommendation:
- The Committee encourages
the Government to accept technical assistance of the Office and expects that the
legislation and accompanying regulations will be effectively amended without delay
so as to bring them into full conformity with the principles of freedom of
association and will allow for trade union pluralism at all levels. It requests the
Government to keep it informed of the status of the labour law
reform.