Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 359, March 2011

Effect given to the recommendations of the Committee and the Governing Body

1. 131. In the previous examination of the case during its June 2010 meeting, the Committee made the following recommendations on matters still pending [see 357th Report, para. 835]:
   • (a) The Committee expects that the judicial authority will hand down a decision in the very near future with regard to the recognition of SUTCUNHEVAL and requests the Government to keep it informed in this regard.
   • (b) The Committee expects that the judicial authority will hand down a decision in the very near future in regard to the non-renewal of the service provider contract of the trade union leader, Mr Franklin Reategui and, in the case that it is found that the non-renewal was based on anti-union grounds, that measures for compensation and sanction are taken as provided by national law. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed in this regard and to send it a copy of the decision as soon as it is handed down.
2. 132. In its communication of 20 October 2010, the Government attaches a copy of the ruling of the judicial authority ordering that recognition be granted to the union in question and its officials. The Committee notes this information with interest.
3. 133. The Government adds that the judicial authority ruled that the application filed as a provisional measure with regard to Mr Reategui was inadmissible, as the main case had been settled by the order granting the union recognition.
4. 134. The Committee notes this information and requests the Government to clarify whether the union official Mr Franklin Reategui is currently providing services to the university.