Individual Case (CAS) - Discussion: 2014, Publication: 103rd ILC session (2014)



The Government communicated the following written information.

With regard to the prohibition of discrimination, in accordance with section 7 of the Labour Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, everyone has equal opportunities for the exercise of his or her rights and freedoms in respect of employment. In the exercise of labour rights, nobody may be subjected to any discrimination on the grounds of sex, age, physical disability, race, nationality, language, material or social situation, public position, place of residence, attitude to religion, political beliefs, tribe or social stratum or membership of public associations. This provision fully reflects the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan (article 14.2 of which provides that nobody may be subjected to discrimination of any kind on grounds of origin, social, public or material status, sex, race, nationality, language, attitude to religion, beliefs, place of residence, or on any other grounds). The concept of “race” is generally understood as being inseparable from “skin colour”. However, in practice there have been no problems with this issue. Nevertheless, in order to resolve the question of including skin colour as a basis of discrimination, further consultations will be held with representatives of the central State authorities and with employers’ and workers’ organizations at the national level. The findings of over 200 special spot investigations in 2013 by state labour inspectors, together with prosecuting authorities, of organizations recruiting foreign labour, revealed 123 instances of wage discrimination between national and foreign workers. The state inspectors responded by issuing 65 orders to employers to eliminate these violations, and imposed 96 administrative fines, amounting to 4.6 million Kazakhstan tenge (KZT). In the first four months of 2014, checks at over 2,000 organizations in the country did not reveal any instances of wage discrimination. To ensure that employers comply with the requirements of labour law concerning workers of pre-retirement age and the prohibition of discrimination against them, supplementary provisions were added in 2013 to the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of 23 July 1999 to prohibit the mass media from disseminating information about employment vacancies containing employment requirements of a discriminatory nature. However, the state labour inspectorate has not received any complaints from citizens alleging violations of their employment rights.

With reference to the exclusion of women from certain occupations, section 186 of the Labour Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan specifies the types of work in which the employment of women is prohibited: (1) it is prohibited to employ women in heavy work, work in harmful (especially harmful) and (or) hazardous conditions, in accordance with a list of the categories of work in which the employment of women is prohibited; (2) the manual lifting and moving by women of loads exceeding the weight limits set for them is prohibited. In order to implement this provision of the Labour Code, Resolution No. 1220 of 28 October 2011, of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, adopted a list of the categories of work in which the employment of women is prohibited and setting out the weight limits for manual lifting and moving by women (hereinafter, the list). Over the past 20 years this list has been revised and updated four times (in 1994, 2004, 2007 and 2011) in the light of the current risks to women’s health. Section 186 and the list itself do not restrict the employment of women, but serve to protect motherhood and women’s health. It should be pointed out that the level of automation in manufacturing in Kazakhstan is below the European level. At present, the country has over 8,500 occupational categories, which include work in harmful working conditions and arduous labour, which is considerably higher than in the European Union. The list was attached but has not been reproduced.

In respect of equality for men and women in employment and occupation, according to figures from the Kazakhstan Statistics Agency for the first quarter of 2014, women’s participation was 31 per cent in industrial production, 26 per cent in construction, 47 per cent in agriculture, forestry and fishing, 60 per cent in finance and insurance, 50 per cent in the professional, scientific and technical sectors and 74 per cent in education. The employed population as a whole numbered 8,587,071 persons, including 4,167,245 women, or 48.5 per cent. Employment relations in respect of equal treatment and equal opportunities for men and women workers, and workers with family responsibilities, are governed by Chapter 17 of the Labour Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, “Aspects of the regulation of the employment of women and other persons with family responsibilities”. Law No. 566-IV of 17 February 2012, of the Republic of Kazakhstan on amending and supplementing the Labour Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the purpose of combining employment with family responsibilities introduced amendments to section 189 of the Code, making it possible, with mutual consent, for one of the parents (the father) to work part time. In addition, by Law No. 50-V of 16 November 2012, the Republic of Kazakhstan ratified the Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention, 1981 (No. 156). The legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan corresponds to the provisions of Convention No. 156. According to figures as at 31 December 2013, the number of employed workers making use of the right to child-care leave (in accordance with section 195 of the Labour Code) was 287,311, including 135 men and 287,176 women. The number of employed workers making use of the right to leave to adopt a child (in accordance with section 194 of the Labour Code) was 218, including one man and 217 women. With regard to amendments to sections 187–189 of the Labour Code, resolving this question requires further study with representatives of the central State authorities and of the national employers’ and workers’ associations.

Women have a priority right to take part in the programme “the roadmap for employment to 2020” (hereinafter, the programme). The programme includes mechanisms to respond to and combat the crisis and to improve effective regulation of the labour market, including labour market forecasting and monitoring, and the engagement of the disadvantaged, unemployed and self-employed members of the population in active employment creation measures. The proportion of women taking part in the programme since its inception is 48.6 per cent (144,600). With regard to the representation of women in the civil service, it should be noted that of the actual number of civil servants (90,220), there were 49,527 women, or 54.9 per cent (as of the fourth quarter of 2013). It should also be noted that in 2013 Kazakhstan occupied a high position, at No. 26, for the indicator, “women in the labour force, ratio to men” in the Global Competitiveness Index of the World Economic Forum. In the context of implementing the general agreement between the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the national workers’ and employers’ associations for 2012-14, provisions have been included in sectoral and regional agreements and in collective agreements to promote employment, save jobs, create decent working conditions for workers over the age of 50, and adopt programmes to improve the qualifications and mobility of those over 50. Monitoring is carried out in compliance with the requirements of labour law for the prevention of discrimination against persons over the age of 50 in recruitment and during employment. It is prohibited to disseminate job vacancies containing requirements of a discriminatory nature in reference to employment. An active employment policy is now being conducted in Kazakhstan in the framework of the programme. It provides for the creation of permanent jobs, the encouragement of entrepreneurial activity, the creation of social jobs, the organization of entry-level work for young people, and an increase in the occupational and territorial mobility of labour resources. In the first quarter of 2014, the economically active population numbered 9.1 million people, of whom 4.4 million, or 48.4 per cent, were women. Women account for 48.8 per cent of those in employment (4.2 million). In the first quarter of 2014, there were 464,000 unemployed people, the number having fallen by 10,500, or 2.2 per cent, in comparison with the same period in 2013. The unemployment level was 5.1 per cent (5.3 per cent in the first quarter of 2013). The female unemployment level was 5.9 per cent. The proportion of unemployed men in the first quarter of 2014 was 43.8 per cent (203,000), and the figure for women was 56.2 per cent (261,000). No figures are kept on the labour market situation of men and women belonging to ethnic and religious minorities. A general agreement has been concluded for 2012–14 between the Government and the national workers’ and employers’ associations. The agreement sets out the obligations of the parties to secure the necessary conditions for decent work, to introduce standards for the quality of life and to bring about growth in labour productivity and stable employment. The draft general agreement for 2015–17 is under preparation. Moreover, state labour inspectors regularly undergo training courses to improve their qualifications, including courses on the law relating to the prevention of discrimination.

In addition, before the Committee, a Government representative referred to the general agreement that had been concluded for 2012–14 and stated that provisions had been included in sectoral and regional agreements and collective agreements to promote employment and create decent working conditions for workers over the age of 50, and adopt programmes to improve the qualifications of persons over 50. Monitoring was carried out in compliance with the labour law. Moreover, an active employment policy was carried out in Kazakhstan in the framework of the programme “Roadmap for Employment 2020”. In response to the issues raised by the Committee of Experts with respect to the implementation of section 7(2) of the Labour Code, including information on any activities undertaken to disseminate the legislation and information on the number, nature and outcome of discrimination cases dealt with by the courts or the labour inspectorate, the Government representative stated that section 7 of the Labour Code provided that everyone had equal opportunities to enjoy their rights and freedoms at work, and no one could be subjected to discrimination. Race was directly linked to the ground of colour and, in practice, there had been no problems with this particular provision. Consultations would be held at the national level with employers’ and workers’ organizations to discuss this particular issue. With respect to the list referred to in section 186 of the Labour Code, the Government representative indicated that section 186 provided for areas where the work of women was prohibited. Work was prohibited in harmful and hazardous conditions. Manual lifting of loads exceeding a specific weight limit was also prohibited. Resolution No. 1220 of 28 October 2011 contained a list of categories of work where employment of women was prohibited. Over the last 20 years, this list had been revised and updated. These restrictions did not limit the employment of women but existed to protect maternity and women’s health.

The Worker members recalled that Convention No. 111 was one of the fundamental Conventions because discrimination at work constituted a violation of a human right that threatened social cohesion and solidarity, and had an impact on the productivity of enterprises. To achieve equality at work, statutory measures should be supplemented by the implementation of employment policies and education to combat stereotyping, as well as the involvement of state officials at all levels of power, including the judiciary. It should also be guaranteed that the social partners were involved, so that they might participate in negotiations on economic and social issues. As mentioned by the Committee of Experts, attention should be paid to the implementation in practice of the legislation. Despite the employment programmes announced in Kazakhstan and the funds allocated to active labour market policies, the Government had not been able to eliminate certain forms of discrimination affecting women, ethnic or religious minorities and persons who were not ethnic Kazakhs. The Worker members stressed moreover the positive role of the social partners in the area of non-discrimination and the trade union organizations in this area. In order to make equality a reality, independent trade unions were required to relay the complaints of workers who were unfairly disadvantaged. A bill on trade unions was threatening workers’ organizations in Kazakhstan. The Office had voiced reservations on the compliance of this bill with the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87). The Worker members pointed out that the fundamental and governance Conventions were closely linked and the application of Convention No. 111 could not be guaranteed without the involvement of the workers’ and employers’ representative organizations. They recalled the Committee of Experts’ comments on the notion of “colour”, which was not considered a ground of discrimination in the Labour Code, whereas this matter constituted a prohibited ground of discrimination under Convention No. 111. According to the Government, this concept was considered inseparable from that of “race” and was adequately covered, but it committed to hold consultations with the workers on the subject. The Worker members expressed the hope that the bill being drafted on trade unions would allow for these consultations referred to in the written information submitted by the Government. The Worker members underlined that the Government discriminated in favour of Kazakhs who constituted a majority in higher state positions; ethnic minorities were the victims of hostility, insults and discrimination in employment. In March 2014, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination reiterated its concern that Kazakhstan had not adopted comprehensive legislation to prevent and combat discrimination in all areas. On the basis of this, and the comments made by the Committee of Experts, the Worker members were of the opinion that the Kazakh legislation as a whole was not in conformity with the Convention, and that the 2013 amendment of the Act of 23 July 1999 had not attained its objective. As regards the exclusion of women from certain occupations, it was impossible to check the list of occupations under section 186 of the Labour Code, as this list was not included in the written information provided by the Government. With respect to equality of men and women in employment, this written information contained figures that the Worker members had not been able to verify. Without wishing to question their accuracy, they referred to the report of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women of 10 March 2014. Although this Committee had noted positive developments, it remained concerned by a number of facts: (i) the concept of gender-based discrimination existed but did not incorporate the issues of direct or indirect discriminations, as required under Convention No. 111; (ii) women who were victims of violence or harassment did not have adequate access to justice and encountered social stigma and negative stereotyping in the world of work and in their daily life; (iii) women and girls encountered difficulties of access to education on grounds of nationality, which was a factor that exacerbated discrimination; and (iv) the wage gap between men and women still existed. On this subject, the situation had somewhat improved with a 6 per cent drop in the wage differentials between men and women, but the average monthly nominal wages for women workers only increased to 67.6 per cent of that of men in 2011. The average monthly wages of men were higher in all areas of activity, including in traditionally “female” occupations such as education and health care. The trend in the reduction of the relative competitiveness of women in the labour market compared to men started during pregnancy and continued during child care. The Worker members concluded that the Government should urgently provide the information requested by the Committee of Experts, while noting the information on the component of the active employment policy concerning the elimination of discrimination, and stressed the need for the optimal functioning of freedom of association.

The Employer members recalled that the Committee of Experts had noted that section 7(2) of the Labour Code covered all of the prohibited grounds set out in Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention, except for colour and it had requested the Government to amend the Code in this regard. The Government had indicated that further consultations would be undertaken on this matter between the Government and the workers’ and employers’ organizations. The Government was urged to conduct such consultations, including with the social partners, with a view to ensuring that the Labour Code prohibited all of the grounds articulated in the Convention. Regarding the list of occupations for which it is prohibited to engage women and the maximum weights for women to lift and move manually, pursuant to section 186(1) and (2) of the Labour Code, the Government had indicated that this list was meant to protect women’s health. However, protective measures applicable to women’s employment that were based on stereotypes regarding women’s professional and physical abilities, as well as stereotypes concerning their role in society, violated the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women in employment. Therefore, such a list was troubling in light of the obligations of the Convention. The adoption of the Law of 2009 on State Guarantees on Equal Rights and Equal Opportunities of Men and Women, which provided for gender equality in labour relations as well as in education and training, appeared to be one area of progress in the case. With regard to sections 187, 188 and 189 of the Labour Code, it was problematic when legislation reinforced and prolonged stereotypes regarding the roles of men and women related to family responsibilities, including the stereotype that caring for a child was the primary role of women. If legislation included measures aimed at facilitating the quality of remuneration of work and the reconciliation between work and family responsibilities, they must be applied on an equal basis to both men and women. Sections 187 to 189 of the Labour Code should therefore be amended to grant entitlements related to family responsibilities to men and women on an equal footing. More information should be provided, without delay, regarding Law No. 566-IV of 17 February 2012, which the Government indicated had introduced an amendment to section 189 of the Labour Code. In addition, the information provided by the Government partially responded to the request of the Committee of Experts regarding measures taken to promote and ensure equality of opportunity and treatment for women and men in employment, including in the public sector. Furthermore, the Committee of Experts had expressed its concern related to discrimination against minority groups, particularly non-ethnic Kazakhs, with regard to employment opportunities in state bodies and public services. The Government was encouraged to provide information in this regard, without further delay. The Government was also encouraged to work with the ILO in order to provide such information, including information on progress made in applying the Convention in both law and practice.

The Worker member of the Russian Federation noted that it was important to place the discussion of the case in the context of the recent signing between the Russian Federation, Belarus and Kazakhstan of an agreement establishing a single economic zone. Discrimination, despite being prohibited by the Constitution and national legislation, remained a serious unaddressed issue. To give effect to the law, effective implementation, the involvement of the social partners, and an independent specially trained judiciary were necessary. Discrimination due to trade union membership was very widespread and deep-rooted, and there were many cases in both the private and public sectors of dismissal or intimidation aimed at forcing members to leave unions. In such conditions, the activities of independent trade unions were seriously compromised. Furthermore, there was no independent body to deal with cases of discrimination and the isolated interventions from the labour inspectorate were insufficient given the extent of the phenomenon. The lack of adequate and dissuasive sanctions in cases of violation of the legislation was another problem. In addition, the situation was liable to deteriorate following current significant amendments to labour legislation, which could have the effect of preventing the independent organizations from accessing the collective mechanisms for the defence of workers’ rights. The Government should, in that context, request the ILO to provide extended technical assistance.

The Government representative of Denmark, speaking also on behalf of Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. She recalled that the promotion of gender equality and equal opportunity was one of the central objectives of the ILO and the United Nations. Gender equality was important for the development of successful societies which could only be achieved using the talents of the whole society, both men and women. Gender equality was hence a condition for democracy, economic growth, and welfare. In Nordic countries, where the idea of equal opportunities was an overriding principle, women played a decisive role in the establishment and maintenance of the welfare state. In this respect, she stressed that the role of women in the labour market should not be determined by assumptions and stereotypes and reflected in a legal framework that created obstacles to the equal participation of woman and men in the labour market. She further recalled that the aim of legislation regarding occupational safety and health was to protect all workers irrespective of their gender against risks inherent in their work. Therefore, the Government needed to eliminate all legislation that violated the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment for men and women in employment and occupation. To this end, it was further necessary to amend the legislation reflecting the assumption that the main responsibility for family care lay with women, as well as the legislation which excluded men from certain rights and benefits.

The Worker member of Norway referred to section 186 of the Labour Code and to the list in accordance to which the employment of women was prohibited in 299 occupations. The objective of this prohibition was to protect women from hazardous or difficult work and to avoid health problems. However, provisions relating to the protection of persons working under these conditions should be aimed at protecting the health and safety of both men and women at work. The speaker indicated that in the Nordic countries women could choose their occupation and that protective measures applicable to women’s employment which were based on stereotypes regarding women’s professional abilities and role in society, violated the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women in employment and occupation. She urged the Government to abolish this list of prohibited occupations and to adopt stricter measures for the protection of occupational health and safety of both men and women.

The Government member of the Russian Federation expressed his appreciation for the significant efforts deployed by the Government in order to achieve conformity with the Convention, particularly by undertaking monitoring and inspections, and where required, imposing administrative sanctions. The discussion had established that the national legislation was not in full compliance with the Convention with regard to the list of hazardous and difficult jobs for which it is prohibited to engage women. This could give the impression of a limitation on the principle of equality between the sexes, but it in fact had the objective of protecting the health of women, who were otherwise well represented in the workforce. The Government should therefore continue to work in the constructive spirit it had demonstrated during the discussion of the case. In conclusion, the speaker underlined that the discussion should focus only on the Convention under examination.

The Government representative stated that the Government would provide due follow-up, together with the ILO, on the grounds of the debate to ensure the full implementation of the Convention. Turning to the intervention of the Worker members, which gave rise to the impression that the Government had not supplied the list of occupations in which women could not be employed, he recalled that information on this list could be found in the written information submitted by the Government to the Committee. In this respect, he considered that the use of many technical terms related to the area of metallurgy had possibly provoked this confusion. In this context, he stressed that the jobs on this list were not tantamount to an indication that women were not qualified or competent to do these jobs. The jobs which appeared on the list were inaccessible for women due to their hazardous nature or difficult conditions. In conclusion, he reiterated that the Government would consider the recommendations of this Committee to ensure full implementation of the Convention.

The Employer members, noting the Government’s indication that the purpose of the list of jobs for which it is prohibited to engage women was for the protection of these persons, reiterated their concern that protective measures based on stereotypes with regard to professional abilities and roles in society violated the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women in employment and occupation. They supported the comment of the Worker member of Norway that, rather than excluding women from performing some professional roles, it was important to assure that work was safe for both men and women equally. The conclusions should include the areas regarding which the Government was requested to provide further information, as well as information on the progress made with respect to the required changes to the Labour Code. The Government’s indication that it hoped to work on resolving these issues, in order to achieve full compliance with the Convention in both law and practice, was encouraging.

The Worker members emphasized the importance of the question of non-discrimination and the equality of treatment of workers, without the possibility to exclude or giving preference on the grounds of race, colour or sex. It was undeniable that the Government had made important efforts on the subject, but beyond the existence of legislation, its effective application was necessary and there still remained a lot of work on this issue in order to ensure that discrimination on the grounds of colour or race was no longer a reality in the country. The concepts of direct and indirect discrimination were also incorrectly defined which risked cancelling out the measures taken to combat discrimination. Discrimination against women with respect to access to certain professions, concerning acts of violence or harassment at the workplace as well as the level of remuneration remained problems on which the Government had not given a completely satisfactory reply. In the light of these objectives, it was necessary to evaluate the results obtained in the implementation of the Roadmap for Employment 2020 and the general agreement concluded between the Government and the national workers’ and employers’ organizations for the period 2012–14. The consultations to be carried out to this effect implied moreover the full respect of Conventions Nos 87 and 98 and should take place with independent trade unions respecting pluralism. The Government should therefore request technical assistance from the ILO and provide information to the Committee of Experts in time for its session in 2014 concerning the list of occupations from which women were excluded, statistical data on the salary gap between men and women, as well as statistical data on the employment situation of men and women who were not ethnic Kazakhs.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2015, published 105th ILC session (2016)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2011, published 101st ILC session (2012)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2010, published 100th ILC session (2011)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Legislative developments. Prohibition of discrimination. The Committee notes that the new Labour Code, which was adopted on 15 May 2007, includes a number of provisions which give effect to the Convention. Section 4 declares the prohibition of discrimination to be the principle of the labour legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, while section 7 sets out this prohibition in more detail:

–      section 7(1) provides that everyone shall have equal opportunities to exercise their rights and freedoms in the sphere of labour;

–      section 7(2) provides that no one may be subjected to any discrimination in exercising their labour rights based on sex, age, physical disabilities, race, nationality, language, material, social or official position, place of residence, attitude to religion, political convictions, tribe or social stratum or membership of public associations; and

–      section 7(3) provides that differences, exceptions, preferences and restrictions determined by requirements inherent in the nature of the work or dictated by the state’s concern for people in need of increased social and legal protection, do not constitute discrimination.

The Committee notes that these provisions cover all prohibited grounds listed in Article 1(1)(a), of the Convention, except the ground of colour. It also notes that section 7(2) also includes a number of additional grounds, as envisaged in Article 1(1)(b) of the Convention (namely age, physical disability, tribe and membership in a public association). The Committee regrets that the ground of citizenship, which was included as a prohibited ground in the previous Labour Code has been removed. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the implementation of the above provisions, including information on any activities undertaken to make these known and information on the number, nature and outcome of discrimination cases dealt with by the courts or the labour inspectorate. In the absence of such information, the Committee requests the Government to take the measures necessary to collect such data, and to indicate the measures taken to that end. The Committee recommends that the prohibited ground of colour is added to section 7(2).

Equality of men and women in employment and occupation. The Committee notes with interest that the new Labour Code grants paid leave to adoptive parents (either the mother or the father) to care for a newly born adopted child (section 194) and unpaid childcare leave until the child reaches the age of three at the parents’ choice, either for the father or the mother (section 195). The Committee welcomes these measures, in particular those that are available to women and men on an equal footing, and requests the Government to provide information on the extent to which this entitlement is being used by men and women.

However, the Committee notes that under section 187 of the Labour Code the employer is prevented from either engaging in night work or overtime work women with children under the age of 7 years and other persons bringing up children under the age of 7 years without a mother, or sending them on business trips or to perform rotational work, without their written consent. Under sections 188 and 189, fathers have the right to child-feeding breaks and to part-time work only in respect of children without a mother. The Committee notes that, in accordance with the principle of gender equality, measures aimed at facilitating the reconciliation of work and family responsibilities should be available on an equal footing for women and men. Provisions which reflect an assumption that caring for a child is the primary role of women prolong and reinforce gender inequality in society and the labour market. The Committee therefore requests the Government to amend these provisions accordingly.

Special measures of protection. The Committee notes that, under section 186(1) of the Labour Code, it is prohibited to engage women to perform heavy work or work under harmful and hazardous working conditions. Under section 186(2), it is prohibited for women to lift and move manually weights in excess of the maximum standards established for them. The list of jobs for which it is prohibited to engage women and the maximum weights for women to lift and move manually shall be determined by the state labour authority in agreement with the health authorities. The Committee recalls that special protective measures for women should be limited to safeguarding maternity, and should be proportional to the nature and scope of the protection needed. The Committee requests the Government to provide a copy of the list referred in section 186 of the Labour Code for examination by the Committee.

Practical application. The Committee notes that the Government has not yet replied to a number of requests for information made by the Committee with regard to the application of the Convention in practice. The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to provide the following:

(i)    detailed information on the specific measures taken to promote and ensure equality of opportunity and treatment of women and men in employment and occupation, including measures to promote women’s access to occupations and employment in areas where they are currently under‑represented, including within the civil service;

(ii)   statistical information on the participation of men and women in the labour market (private and public sectors), branch of economic activity, occupational group and status of employment;

(iii)  information indicating how the principle of gender equality has been integrated into the programmes and measures to promote employment, including statistical information on the number of women who have benefited from employment promotion measures;

(iv)   statistical information on the position in the labour market of men and women belonging to ethnic or religious minorities, including information on their participation in employment in the civil service; and

(v)    information on the measures taken to plan and implement activities to raise awareness of the principles of equality, in cooperation with workers’ and employers’ organizations as envisaged under Article 3(a) and (b) of the Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2009, published 99th ILC session (2010)

Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Legislative developments. Prohibition of discrimination. The Committee notes that the new Labour Code, which was adopted on 15 May 2007, includes a number of provisions which give effect to the Convention. Section 4 declares the prohibition of discrimination to be the principle of the labour legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, while section 7 sets out this prohibition in more detail:

–      section 7(1) provides that everyone shall have equal opportunities to exercise their rights and freedoms in the sphere of labour;

–      section 7(2) provides that no one may be subjected to any discrimination in exercising their labour rights based on sex, age, physical disabilities, race, nationality, language, material, social or official position, place of residence, attitude to religion, political convictions, tribe or social stratum or membership of public associations; and

–      section 7(3) provides that differences, exceptions, preferences and restrictions determined by requirements inherent in the nature of the work or dictated by the state’s concern for people in need of increased social and legal protection, do not constitute discrimination.

The Committee notes that these provisions cover all prohibited grounds listed in Article 1(1)(a), of the Convention, except the ground of colour. It also notes that section 7(2) also includes a number of additional grounds, as envisaged in Article 1(1)(b) of the Convention (namely age, physical disability, tribe and membership in a public association). The Committee regrets that the ground of citizenship, which was included as a prohibited ground in the previous Labour Code has been removed. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the implementation of the above provisions, including information on any activities undertaken to make these known and information on the number, nature and outcome of discrimination cases dealt with by the courts or the labour inspectorate. In the absence of such information, the Committee requests the Government to take the measures necessary to collect such data, and to indicate the measures taken to that end. The Committee recommends that the prohibited ground of colour is added to section 7(2).

Equality of men and women in employment and occupation. The Committee notes with interest that the new Labour Code grants paid leave to adoptive parents (either the mother or the father) to care for a newly born adopted child (section 194) and unpaid childcare leave until the child reaches the age of three at the parents’ choice, either for the father or the mother (section 195). The Committee welcomes these measures, in particular those that are available to women and men on an equal footing, and requests the Government to provide information on the extent to which this entitlement is being used by men and women.

However, the Committee notes that under section 187 of the Labour Code the employer is prevented from either engaging in night work or overtime work women with children under the age of 7 years and other persons bringing up children under the age of 7 years without a mother, or sending them on business trips or to perform rotational work, without their written consent. Under sections 188 and 189, fathers have the right to child-feeding breaks and to part-time work only in respect of children without a mother. The Committee notes that, in accordance with the principle of gender equality, measures aimed at facilitating the reconciliation of work and family responsibilities should be available on an equal footing for women and men. Provisions which reflect an assumption that caring for a child is the primary role of women prolong and reinforce gender inequality in society and the labour market. The Committee therefore requests the Government to amend these provisions accordingly.

Special measures of protection. The Committee notes that, under section 186(1) of the Labour Code, it is prohibited to engage women to perform heavy work or work under harmful and hazardous working conditions. Under section 186(2), it is prohibited for women to lift and move manually weights in excess of the maximum standards established for them. The list of jobs for which it is prohibited to engage women and the maximum weights for women to lift and move manually shall be determined by the state labour authority in agreement with the health authorities. The Committee recalls that special protective measures for women should be limited to safeguarding maternity, and should be proportional to the nature and scope of the protection needed. The Committee requests the Government to provide a copy of the list referred in section 186 of the Labour Code for examination by the Committee.

Draft gender equality legislation. The Committee previously noted that a draft law on equal rights and opportunities for men and women is under consideration. The Committee hopes that such legislation can be passed in the near future and requests the Government to provide the text of the law when adopted.

Practical application. The Committee notes that the Government has not yet replied to a number of requests for information made by the Committee with regard to the application of the Convention in practice. The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to provide the following:

(i)    detailed information on the specific measures taken to promote and ensure equality of opportunity and treatment of women and men in employment and occupation, including measures to promote women’s access to occupations and employment in areas where they are currently under-represented, including within the civil service;

(ii)   statistical information on the participation of men and women in the labour market (private and public sectors), branch of economic activity, occupational group and status of employment;

(iii) information indicating how the principle of gender equality has been integrated into the programmes and measures to promote employment, including statistical information on the number of women who have benefited from employment promotion measures;

(iv)  statistical information on the position in the labour market of men and women belonging to ethnic or religious minorities, including information on their participation in employment in the civil service; and

(v)   information on the measures taken to plan and implement activities to raise awareness of the principles of equality, in cooperation with workers’ and employers’ organizations as envisaged under Article 3(a) and (b) of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. Legislative developments. The Committee notes the adoption of the new Labour Code (Act No. 251) on 15 May 2007 which it will examine as soon as a translation becomes available. It also notes that a draft law on equal rights and opportunities for men and women is currently under consideration. The Committee hopes that the legislation will be passed in the near future and requests the Government to ensure that the new gender equality legislation will provide for the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment in accordance with the Convention, providing for a prohibition of direct and indirect discrimination in respect to all aspects of employment and occupation, both in the private and public sectors. The Committee requests the Government to provide the text of the law when adopted.

2. Gender equality in employment and occupation. The Committee notes from the Millennium Development Goals in Kazakhstan Report 2005 that women continue to face serious inequalities in employment and occupation. Gender-based occupational segregation, both vertical and horizontal, remains a major problem, often linked to gender stereotypes about the role of women at work and in the family. The Committee notes that the Government has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2006–16) and a Plan of Action 2006–08 for the implementation of the Strategy. Increasing employment opportunities for men and women is a priority area of cooperation with the ILO under the Decent Work Country Programme for 2007–09. The Committee requests the Government to provide the following in its next report:

(a)   detailed information on the specific measures taken to promote and ensure equality of opportunity and treatment of women and men in employment and occupation, including measures to promote women’s access to occupations and employment in areas where they are currently underrepresented, including within the civil service;

(b)    statistical information on the participation of men and women in the labour market (private and public sectors), branch of economic activity, occupational group and status of employment;

(c)    information indicating how the principle of gender equality has been integrated into the programmes and measures to promote employment, including statistical information on the number of women who have benefited from employment promotion measures.

3. Equality of opportunity and treatment on the basis of race, colour, national extraction and religion. The Committee recalls that the Convention requires the Government to adopt and implement a national policy to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation with a view to eliminating discrimination based on all the grounds listed in Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention. Accordingly, the Committee, sought information on the situation of the different ethnic groups of the population. Noting that the Government’s report contains no reply in this regard, the Committee urges the Government to provide statistical information on the position in the labour market of men and women belonging to ethnic or religious minorities, including information on their participation in employment in the civil service.

4. Awareness raising and education. The Committee stresses the importance of undertaking information and education activities to raise awareness of the principles of equality and the need to eliminate discrimination in employment and occupation among workers and employers, their respective organizations, as well as the public at large. Please provide information on the measures taken to plan and implement such activities, in cooperation with workers’ and employer’s organizations as envisaged under Article 3(a) and (b) of the Convention.

5. Enforcement of the legislation. The Committee notes that the Government’s report provides no information on cases relating to equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation dealt with by the courts or the labour inspectorate. The Committee requests the Government to provide the information in its next report.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2007, published 97th ILC session (2008)

1. Legislative developments. The Committee notes the adoption of the new Labour Code (Act No. 251) on 15 May 2007 which it will examine as soon as a translation becomes available. It also notes that a draft law on equal rights and opportunities for men and women is currently under consideration. The Committee hopes that the legislation will be passed in the near future and requests the Government to ensure that the new gender equality legislation will provide for the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment in accordance with the Convention, providing for a prohibition of direct and indirect discrimination in respect to all aspects of employment and occupation, both in the private and public sectors. The Committee requests the Government to provide the text of the law when adopted.

2. Gender equality in employment and occupation. The Committee notes from the Millennium Development Goals in Kazakhstan Report 2005 that women continue to face serious inequalities in employment and occupation. Gender-based occupational segregation, both vertical and horizontal, remains a major problem, often linked to gender stereotypes about the role of women at work and in the family. The Committee notes that the Government has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2006–16) and a Plan of Action 2006–08 for the implementation of the Strategy. Increasing employment opportunities for men and women is a priority area of cooperation with the ILO under the Decent Work Country Programme for 2007–09. The Committee requests the Government to provide the following in its next report :

(a)   detailed information on the specific measures taken to promote and ensure equality of opportunity and treatment of women and men in employment and occupation, including measures to promote women’s access to occupations and employment in areas where they are currently underrepresented, including within the civil service;

(b)   statistical information on the participation of men and women in the labour market (private and public sectors), branch of economic activity, occupational group and status of employment;

(c)   information indicating how the principle of gender equality has been integrated into the programmes and measures to promote employment, including statistical information on the number of women who have benefited from employment promotion measures.

3. Equality of opportunity and treatment on the basis of race, colour, national extraction and religion. The Committee recalls that the Convention requires the Government to adopt and implement a national policy to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation with a view to eliminating discrimination based on all the grounds listed in Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention. Accordingly, the Committee, sought information on the situation of the different ethnic groups of the population. Noting that the Government’s report contains no reply in this regard, the Committee urges the Government to provide statistical information on the position in the labour market of men and women belonging to ethnic or religious minorities, including information on their participation in employment in the civil service.

4. Awareness raising and education. The Committee stresses the importance of undertaking information and education activities to raise awareness of the principles of equality and the need to eliminate discrimination in employment and occupation among workers and employers, their respective organizations, as well as the public at large. Please provide information on the measures taken to plan and implement such activities, in cooperation with workers’ and employer’s organizations as envisaged under Article 3(a) and (b) of the Convention.

5. Enforcement of the legislation. The Committee notes that the Government’s report provides no information on cases relating to equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation dealt with by the courts or the labour inspectorate. The Committee requests the Government to provide the information in its next report.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2006, published 96th ILC session (2007)

The Committee notes the Government’s report and requests the Government to provide additional information on the matters set out below.

1. Article 1. Legislative developments. The Committee notes from the United Nations Development Assistance Framework for Kazakhstan (2005-09) that Kazakhstan is committed to drafting and adopting gender equality legislation. Please provide information on any measures taken in this regard.

2. Additional grounds. The Committee recalls that section 4 of the Labour Act, in addition to the prohibited grounds listed in Article 1(1)(a), also prohibits discrimination on grounds such as age, property, and place of residence, membership of social associations and citizenship as impermissible grounds of discrimination. The Committee again requests the Government to indicate whether it considers these additional grounds outlined as covered under the Convention, in accordance with Article 1(1)(b) of the Convention.

3. Article 2. Promotion of equality policy. The Committee notes that the Government has adopted a Strategic Development Plan, a Programme to Combat Poverty and Unemployment (2003-10), and a Public Employment Programme (2005-07). The Committee requests the Government to indicate how these plans and programmes promote equal access to vocational training and employment of women and men, as well as of members of the different ethnic and religious groups. The Committee also reiterates its request to the Government to provide information on the measures envisaged under the National Action Plan on the Status of Women to promote equal participation of women in the labour market, and on any progress made in their implementation.

4. With reference to its previous comments concerning the Employment Act of 2001, the Committee notes that the Act provides for measures, such as occupational guidance and training, to promote access of certain target groups to training and employment, including single parents and parents with many children. The Committee would appreciate receiving statistical information on the number of persons that benefited from such measures, disaggregated by sex.

5. Article 3(a). Cooperation with workers’ and employers’ organizations and other appropriate bodies. The Committee notes that the Social Partnership Act, 2000, provides a framework for cooperation with employers’ and workers’ organizations and that the most recent tripartite General Agreement under the Act was concluded for the period of 2005-06. The Committee requests the Government to indicate more specifically how the issue of equality of opportunity and treatment is addressed in the framework of social partnership.

6. Article 3(b). Educational programmes. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to provide information concerning any educational programmes or other awareness-raising measures designed to secure acceptance of the principle of equality in employment, including copies of any associated publications and materials.

7. Article 3(d). Civil service. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that article 3 of the Civil Service Act guarantees equal rights of all persons to admission to public employment and to career advancement. The Committee nevertheless reiterates its request to the Government to provide a copy of the Civil Service Act, as well as statistical data, disaggregated by sex, relating to employees in the public service. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the participation of members of the different ethnic groups in civil service employment.

8. Article 3(f). Noting the employment statistics provided in the Government’s report, the Committee requests the Government to supply, in its next report, labour market data, disaggregated by sex. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the position in the labour market of the different ethnic minorities.

9. Article 4. The Committee reiterates its request for confirmation that appellate review is available where persons are accused of activities prejudicial to the security of the State, and for the particular details of the right to appeal of such persons.

10. Parts III and IV. Enforcement. The Committee also renews its request for information about national judicial decisions involving questions relating to the application of the Convention and, if possible, for copies of the texts of these decisions. The Government is also requested to indicate the number of cases in which the state labour inspectors have forwarded information or reports concerning practices of discrimination to the responsible law enforcement bodies.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. Article 1 of the Convention. Definition of discrimination. The Committee once again refers to its previous request and asks the Government to indicate whether the Constitution and the Labour Act are intended to cover direct and indirect discrimination as required under the Convention.

2. Article 1(1)(b). Additional grounds. Recalling that article 14 of the Constitution and section 4 of the Labour Act also prohibit discrimination on grounds of property and official status, language and place of residence, section 4 of the Labour Act includes membership of social associations and citizenship as impermissible grounds for discrimination. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate whether it intends to bring these grounds under the Convention in accordance with Article 1(1)(b) of the Convention.

3. Article 2. Promotion of equality policy. The Committee notes the explanations in the Government’s report concerning the Employment Act of January 2001. According to the Government’s report, provisions in this legislation protect and assist "target population groups" seeking employment, and "provide state guarantees in the field of employment" The Government is requested to supply a copy of the abovementioned Act, and Government Ordinance No. 836 of 19 June 2001, together with information relating to the measures undertaken on the basis of said legislation specifically to promote the principle of equality in employment. The Committee notes the general reference made to such measures in the first paragraph of the follow-up report, but requests more specific elaboration on these measures.

4. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide copies of the Social Partnership Act of 2000, and the agreement concluded under it. The Committee also notes the Government’s reference to a draft employment programme for 2005-07, which has been sent to employers’ and workers’ organizations for their consideration. The Committee requests the Government to indicate precisely what areas of the programme promote equal opportunities and treatment in employment in accordance with the Convention.

The Committee notes the report does not contain information on the following points so it is bound to repeat them as follows:

5. The Committee notes from other sources of information that several positive measures to implement the Convention have been undertaken by the Government. The Committee particularly refers to the concluding observations of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) (A/56/38, paragraphs 71 and 73, 18 and 23 January 2001) in which the Government indicated that it had undertaken several initiatives, including the development of a national plan of action for the improvement of the status of women, and the initiation of a special credit line to support women entrepreneurs, both by the National Commission for Family and Women. The Committee requests the Government to supply copies of the national plan of action and all other programmes designed by the national commission to promote women’s participation in the labour market. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would also provide information on programmes designed to promote the principle of the Convention with respect to religious and ethnic minorities.

6. Article 3. The Committee notes the Government’s indications concerning this Article of the Convention. It requests the Government to provide further information on the methods of cooperation with employers’ and workers’ organizations to secure the observance of the principle of the Convention. Also, please provide the details of the educational programmes designed to secure the acceptance of the principle of equality in employment, including copies of any associated publications and materials.

7. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that the Civil Service Act guarantees the right of citizens of the Republic to be recruited into the civil service in accordance with their abilities and vocational qualifications. The Government is asked to provide a copy of the Civil Service Act and statistical data, disaggregated by sex, relating to employees in the public service.

8. Recalling the obligation of ratifying States to ensure observance of the principle of non-discrimination in the activities of vocational guidance and training under their direction, the Committee requests the Government to provide information, including statistical data, regarding the measures designed to ensure the observance of the principle of the Convention in the fields of vocational guidance and training under the direction of a national authority.

9. Article 4. The Committee requests the Government to confirm that appellate review is available for persons accused of activities prejudicial to the security of the State, and to provide particulars of the right to appeal of such persons.

10. Article 5. The Committee refers to the concluding observations of CEDAW (A/56/38, paragraph 101) in which the concern is expressed that the present structuring of the social benefits system and the protective labour legislation may create additional obstacles to the employment of women in the labour market. In the light of the foregoing, the Committee requests the Government to supply a copy of the Employment Act and inform it of the measures undertaken to ensure that the Employment Act’s provisions conform to the principle of the Convention.

11. Part IV of the report form. Noting that the Government has not provided information concerning this part of the report form, the Committee requests the Government to indicate whether courts of law or other tribunals have given decisions involving questions of principle relating to the application of the Convention and, if so, to provide the text of these decisions.

12. Part V of the report form. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide information, including statistical data and extracts from official reports, on the manner in which the Convention is applied, including information on any practical difficulties in the application of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2004, published 93rd ILC session (2005)

1. Article 1 of the Convention. Definition of discrimination. The Committee once again refers to it’s previous request and asks the Government to indicate whether the Constitution and the Labour Act are intended to cover direct and indirect discrimination as required under the Convention.

2. Article 1(1)(b). Additional grounds. Recalling that article 14 of the Constitution and section 4 of the Labour Act also prohibit discrimination on grounds of property and official status, language and place of residence, section 4 of the Labour Act includes membership of social associations and citizenship as impermissible grounds for discrimination. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate whether it intends to bring these grounds under the Convention in accordance with Article 1(1)(b) of the Convention.

3. Article 2. Promotion of equality policy. The Committee notes the explanations in the Government’s report concerning the Employment Act of January 2001. According to the Government’s report, provisions in this legislation protect and assist "target population groups" seeking employment, and "provide state guarantees in the field of employment" The Government is requested to supply a copy of the abovementioned Act, and Government Ordinance No. 836 of 19 June 2001, together with information relating to the measures undertaken on the basis of said legislation specifically to promote the principle of equality in employment. The Committee notes the general reference made to such measures in the first paragraph of the follow up report, but requests more specific elaboration on these measures.

4. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide copies of the Social Partnership Act of 2000, and the agreement concluded under it. The Committee also notes the Governments reference to a draft employment programme for 2005-07, which, has been sent to employers’ and workers’ organizations for their consideration. The Committee requests the Government to indicate precisely what areas of the programme promote equal opportunities and treatment in employment in accordance with the Convention.

The Committee notes the report does not contain information on the following points so it is bound to repeat them as follows:

5. The Committee notes from other sources of information that several positive measures to implement the Convention have been undertaken by the Government. The Committee particularly refers to the concluding observations of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) (A/56/38, paragraphs 71 and 73, 18 and 23 January 2001) in which the Government indicated that it had undertaken several initiatives, including the development of a national plan of action for the improvement of the status of women, and the initiation of a special credit line to support women entrepreneurs, both by the National Commission for Family and Women. The Committee requests the Government to supply copies of the national plan of action and all other programmes designed by the national commission to promote women’s participation in the labour market. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would also provide information on programmes designed to promote the principle of the Convention with respect to religious and ethnic minorities.

6. Article 3. The Committee notes the Government’s indications concerning this Article of the Convention. It requests the Government to provide further information on the methods of cooperation with employers’ and workers’ organizations to secure the observance of the principle of the Convention. Also, please provide the details of the educational programmes designed to secure the acceptance of the principle of equality in employment, including copies of any associated publications and materials.

7. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that the Civil Service Act guarantees the right of citizens of the Republic to be recruited into the civil service in accordance with their abilities and vocational qualifications. The Government is asked to provide a copy of the Civil Service Act and statistical data, disaggregated by sex, relating to employees in the public service.

8. Recalling the obligation of ratifying States to ensure observance of the principle of non-discrimination in the activities of vocational guidance and training under their direction, the Committee requests the Government to provide information, including statistical data, regarding the measures designed to ensure the observance of the principle of the Convention in the fields of vocational guidance and training under the direction of a national authority.

9. Article 4. The Committee requests the Government to confirm that appellate review is available for persons accused of activities prejudicial to the security of the State, and to provide particulars of the right to appeal of such persons.

10. Article 5. The Committee refers to the concluding observations of CEDAW (A/56/38, paragraph 101) in which the concern is expressed that the present structuring of the social benefits system and the protective labour legislation may create additional obstacles to the employment of women in the labour market. In the light of the foregoing, the Committee requests the Government to supply a copy of the Employment Act and inform it of the measures undertaken to ensure that the Employment Act’s provisions conform to the principle of the Convention.

11. Part IV of the report form. Noting that the Government has not provided information concerning this part of the report form, the Committee requests the Government to indicate whether courts of law or other tribunals have given decisions involving questions of principle relating to the application of the Convention and, if so, to provide the text of these decisions.

12.­ Part V of the report form. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide information, including statistical data and extracts from official reports, on the manner in which the Convention is applied, including information on any practical difficulties in the application of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2002, published 91st ILC session (2003)

The Committee notes the first report of the Government. It asks the Government to provide further information in its next report on the following points.

1. Article 1 of the Convention. The Committee notes that the Constitution and the Labour Act both prohibit discrimination on all of the grounds covered by the Convention. Recalling that the Convention prohibits both direct and indirect forms of discrimination - a concept that refers to situations in which apparently neutral laws or practices result in inequalities on the basis of the grounds listed in the Convention - the Committee requests the Government to indicate whether the Constitution and the Labour Act are intended to cover direct and indirect discrimination as required under the Convention.

2. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that no differences exist between the grounds of discrimination covered by the Convention and those grounds covered by the relevant national laws. However, article 14 of the Constitution and section 4 of the Labour Act also prohibit discrimination on grounds of property or official status, language and place of residence, and section 4 of the Labour Act includes membership of social associations and citizenship as impermissible grounds for discrimination. It therefore requests the Government to indicate whether it intends to bring these grounds under the Convention in accordance with Article 1(1)(b) of the Convention.

3. Article 2. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that support in finding work, career development guidance and vocational training are provided for under the Employment Act and Government Ordinance No. 836 of 19 June 2001. The Committee asks the Government to provide copies of the abovementioned legislation, together with information relating to the measures undertaken on the basis of said legislation specifically to promote the principle of equality in employment.

4. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that, in accordance with the Social Partnership Act of 2000, a general agreement encompassing such issues as social development, the shaping of the labour market, and the adoption of fundamental principles and rights in the labour sphere is concluded annually between the Government and representatives of workers’ and employers’ associations. It requests the Government to provide copies of the Act and the general agreement concluded under it.

5. The Committee notes from other sources of information that several positive measures to implement the Convention have been undertaken by the Government. The Committee particularly refers to the concluding observations of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) (A/56/38, paragraphs 71 and 73, 18 and 23 January 2001) in which the Government indicated that it had undertaken several initiatives, including the development of a national plan of action for the improvement of the status of women, and the initiation of a special credit line to support women entrepreneurs, both by the National Commission for Family and Women. The Committee requests the Government to supply copies of the national plan of action and all other programmes designed by the national commission to promote women’s participation in the labour market. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would also provide information on programmes designed to promote the principle of the Convention with respect to religious and ethnic minorities.

6. Article 3. The Committee notes the Government’s indications concerning this Article of the Convention. It requests the Government to provide further information on the methods of cooperation with employers’ and workers’ organizations to secure the observance of the principle of the Convention. Also, please provide the details of the educational programmes designed to secure the acceptance of the principle of equality in employment, including copies of any associated publications and materials.

7. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that the Civil Service Act guarantees the right of citizens of the Republic to be recruited into the civil service in accordance with their abilities and vocational qualifications. The Government is asked to provide a copy of the Civil Service Act and statistical data, disaggregated by sex, relating to employees in the public service.

8. Recalling the obligation of ratifying States to ensure observance of the principle of non-discrimination in the activities of vocational guidance and training under their direction, the Committee requests the Government to provide information, including statistical data, regarding the measures designed to ensure the observance of the principle of the Convention in the fields of vocational guidance and training under the direction of a national authority.

9. Article 4. The Committee requests the Government to confirm that appellate review is available for persons accused of activities prejudicial to the security of the State, and to provide particulars of the right to appeal of such persons.

10. Article 5. The Committee refers to the concluding observations of the CEDAW (A/56/38, paragraph 101) in which the concern is expressed that the present structuring of the social benefits system and the protective labour legislation may create additional obstacles to the employment of women in the labour market. In light of the foregoing, the Committee requests the Government to supply a copy of the Employment Act and inform it of the measures undertaken to ensure that the Employment Act’s provisions conform to the principle of the Convention.

11. Part IV of the report form. Noting that the Government has not provided information concerning this part of the report form, the Committee requests the Government to indicate whether courts of law or other tribunals have given decisions involving questions of principle relating to the application of the Convention and, if so, to provide the text of these decisions.

12. Part V of the report form. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide information, including statistical data and extracts from official reports, on the manner in which the Convention is applied, including information on any practical difficulties in the application of the Convention.