National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
Display in: French - Spanish
Previous comment
The Committee notes the Government’s reports received on 1 November 2007 and 2 August 2009. It also notes with interest the three brochures annexed to the 2007 report on: safety instructions for clearing forests damaged by storms (“Minimum requirements for salvage harvesting in wind-thrown forests”); the use of chemical substances on unsalvaged forest and existing stands; and the use of chemical substances for the planting and raising of new trees, all published by the Swedish Work Environment Authority (WEA).
Articles 6, paragraph 1(b), 5, paragraph 1(a), and 12 of the Convention. Inter-institutional cooperation for occupational safety and health in agriculture, including for independent farmers. The Committee notes with satisfaction the various measures taken by the WEA, in constant coordination with other national authorities and the social partners to prevent work injuries and accidents. According to the Government, information is distributed through brochures (such as the brochure “ADI 629-Working safely with animals”), a specific site on agriculture on the WEA’s web page (http://www.av.se/teman/jordochskog/), as well as through media activities and the participation of the WEA in trade union meetings. The WEA also provides individual advice on matters such as simple systems of risk assessment which can easily be applied by individual farmers, for example in enterprises with few or no employees, as well as supplying contact information to the respective enterprises on social partners with expertise on specific issues. In addition, the Government refers to the launching of a joint supervisory initiative in 2009 aimed at changing farmers’ attitudes to hazards in their work environment. The initiative will continue for three years and will focus on systematic work environment management, machinery, the hazards of firewood production, personal protective equipment and work with animals. It will include undertakings both with and without employees, as most fatal accidents occur in undertakings that do not have employees.
Articles 6, paragraph 1(a) and (b), and 9, paragraph 3. Specific preventive measures taken after the storms “Gudrun” (2005) and “Per” (2007), including special training for labour inspectors. The Committee notes with interest the short- and long-term measures carried out by the WEA in reaction to the consequences of the above storms. In the short term, the districts worst affected by the storm were allowed to coordinate functions in the area of supervision, including calling in work environment inspectors from all over Sweden to join the work. In addition, a specialist conference for 24 inspectors was organized to cope with the special situation in order to improve their skills for the surveillance of the areas hit by the storm. With regard to long-term measures, the WEA supplied information through the above brochures on special work risks following the storm, appropriate personal protective equipment and suitable working methods to cope with risks arising in chainsaw work for emergency salvage harvesting, and the spreading of strong chemical pesticides to prevent insect attacks in unsalvaged forests and existing stands, as well as pesticides to facilitate planting in cleared areas. In addition, labour suppliers, plant nurseries and major forestry enterprises have been targeted with supervisory measures.
The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide details of the other activities to which it refers in its report, namely: (1) media activities; (2) the system of risk assessment; and (3) the joint supervisory initiative in 2009 aimed at changing farmers’ attitudes to hazards in their work environment.
The Committee is raising other points in a request addressed directly to the Government.
In its previous comments, the Committee noted the observations of the Swedish Municipal Workers’ Union, dated 24 March 2003 (and not 2004, as incorrectly stated in the Committee’s previous comments), transmitted to the Government by the Swedish Trade Union Confederation and sent to the Office by the tripartite committee responsible for relations with the ILO on 29 July 2004 and which concerned the content of the Government’s report submitted to the Office in November 2002. The Committee also noted the Government’s explanations responding in part to these observations, and indicated that it would examine, together with the Government’s subsequent report on the application of the Convention, the information sent in reply to its previous comments, the content of the union’s observations, and any further explanations the Government saw fit to send on the points raised by the union. In its succinct report for the period ending June 2005, the Government did not provide the information requested by the Committee in 2003. It stated that it had no further comments to add to the information sent by the tripartite committee responsible for relations with the ILO in response to the Union’s observation, or to the information from the Swedish Work Environment Authority, communicated with its previous report.
1. Articles 11 and 14 of the Convention. Composition of labour inspection staff in the agriculture sector, specific skills and the number of undertakings liable to inspection. Article 21. Frequency of inspection visits. In reference to the Government’s statement that the resources of the ten district inspection services include 20 labour inspectors for agriculture, the Swedish Municipal Workers’ Union indicates that although these inspectors are effectively responsible for inspections in the agricultural sector, the new working methods mean that the district inspection services now cover a wider field and that inspections in this sector are therefore often carried out by inspectors from different backgrounds. Given that every sector faces working environment-related problems that are not unique to that sector, the skills specifically required for each sector must be supplemented by experience from other sectors. One example might be problems relating to ergonomics in agriculture, which is why labour inspection in agriculture also requires the skills of specialists in ergonomics. These working methods, of a more universal nature, and this global approach to working environment issues echo the principles of a systematic work environment management system, formulated by the Swedish Work Environment Authority and embodied by its activities.
According to the Swedish Work Environment Authority, the present Convention should also be examined in relation to the Safety and Health in Agriculture Convention, 2001 (No. 184), certain provisions of which, i.e. those relating to industrial safety inspectors, women in agriculture and the right to information, are different. The Committee asks the Government to specify the reasons for this point of view.
The Committee also notes that the Swedish Work Environment Authority considers the figure quoted by the Government – 20 labour inspectors in agriculture – to be questionable if referring to full-time inspectors. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide details on this point and indicate, in particular, as requested in the Committee’s 2003 observation, whether the 20 inspectors work full time in agricultural enterprises and, if not, indicate their geographical distribution and the portion of their working hours allocated by the district inspection services to the enforcement of the legislation in agricultural enterprises.
The Committee also asks the Government, once again, to indicate the number of agricultural enterprises liable to labour inspection and any changes in the frequency of inspections in such enterprises.
2. Article 6, paragraph 2, and Articles 18 and 22. “Safer work with agricultural machinery” project. The Committee asks the Government, once again, to provide details of the measures envisaged by the abovementioned project to eliminate the deficiencies in the machinery and facilities posing health and safety risks for agricultural workers, as well as other persons living on farms, and to provide any available statistics on the sanctions imposed or the administrative measures applied, as appropriate. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would inform it of any progress already made in this area.
The Committee notes that on 24 March 2004 the Government sent an observation by the Swedish Trade Union Confederation concerning: (i) possible contradictions between the requirements of this Convention and those of the Safety and Health in Agriculture Convention, 2001 (No. 184), as regards the presence and role of women on the staff of the inspectorate for agriculture; and (ii) the proportion of their duties that work environment inspectors devote to labour inspection in the agricultural sector.
The Committee also notes that the Government forwarded explanations regarding point (ii) above sent by the Work Environment Authority. The Committee will examine, together with the Government’s next report on the application of the Convention, the information sent in reply to its previous comments, the content of the organization’s observations, and any further explanations the Government sees fit to send on the points raised by the organization.
The Committee notes the Government’s reports for the period ending 30 June 2003 and the partial replies to its previous comments, as well as the statistics of employment accidents and cases of occupational diseases in the agricultural sector, hunting and related services, including fatal employment accidents, in 1997-2001. With reference to the information provided by the Government concerning the issues raised previously by the Swedish Employers’ Confederation and the Swedish Agricultural Workers’ Union, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide additional information on the manner in which effect is given to the following Articles.
Article 14 of the Convention. The Committee notes that 20 work environment inspectors operate in ten district inspection services. Please specify whether these inspectors work full time in agricultural enterprises and, if not, indicate their geographical distribution and the portion of their working hours allocated by the district inspection services to the enforcement of the legislation in agricultural enterprises.
Article 21. The Government is asked to specify the number of agricultural enterprises liable to labour inspection and any changes in the frequency of inspections in such enterprises.
Article 6, paragraph 2, and Articles 18 and 22. The Government is asked to provide details of the measures envisaged by the "Safer work with agricultural machinery" project to eliminate the deficiencies in the machinery and facilities posing health and safety risks for agricultural workers, as well as other persons living on farms, and to provide the available statistics on the sanctions imposed or the administrative measures applied, as appropriate.
The Committee notes the Government’s report and the statistics on work accidents and work-related illnesses disaggregated by activity and gender for 1998, 1999 and 2000. It also notes the observations from the Swedish Agricultural Workers’ Union (SAWU) and the information provided in reply by the Government and the National Board of Occupational Safety and Health. According to the SAWU, cooperation between the labour inspectorate in agriculture and employers and workers or their organizations (Article 13 of the Convention) is inadequate particularly at local level and should be developed on a more regular basis. The SAWU also regrets that there has been a reduction in the number of inspectors and in the time spent by inspectors in the agricultural sector (Article 14) despite the fact that the proportion of fatal accidents in the agricultural sector is relatively high compared to all sectors taken together. Furthermore, the time between visits and follow-up visits is becoming longer and longer because inspectors spend their time on other activities. The National Board of Occupational Safety and Health (NBOSH) for its part states that cooperation between the supervisory authorities and the organizations of agricultural employers and workers is flexible, focusing on certain specific questions in agriculture when the need arises. As to the strength of the agricultural labour inspectorate, the Government indicates that 23 inspectors are responsible for ten districts. While omitting to state whether this number is sufficient in respect of the criteria set in Article 14 of the Convention, the Government nonetheless says that most of the fatal accidents mentioned by the SAWU involve tractors and that, consequently, in the spring of 1999 a joint official project was conducted with seven inspection districts, entitled "Safer work with farm tractors". Measures to improve safety were ordered for 71 per cent of the 1,013 tractors subjected to a technical inspection in 413 undertakings. Furthermore, the Government states that the adoption of a new supervisory approach for agricultural machinery is being implemented in 300 undertakings with an audit of 15,000 agricultural machines, and refers to measures taken by the NBOSH in 1996 to prohibit the use of agricultural machinery by minors. The Government also states that the Labour Inspectorate has alerted employers to the risks incurred by children as passengers on tractors, such as the possibility of hearing impairment or of the tractor being started by a child.
The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide the information requested in the report form on the Convention under Article 14 and on practical measures taken or envisaged to ensure that inspections are carried out as often and as thoroughly as is necessary, in accordance with Article 21.