National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
Display in: French - Spanish
The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in reply to its earlier comments, and in particular, that concerning a special programme to register all handicapped workers and handicapped job-seekers. It would be grateful if, in its next report, the Government would supply additional information on the following points:
Article 7, subparagraph (a), of the Convention. The Government states that there is no specialization by occupations and by industries within the employment offices due to the tight labour market and the small number of registrants involved. The Committee recalls in this connection that in the observations made in November 1989 by the Malaysian Trades Union Congress on the application of the Convention, the organization expressed concern about the lack of such specialization. The Committee therefore would be grateful if the Government would indicate, in its next report, what measures have been taken or envisaged with a view to facilitate within the various employment offices specialization by occupations and by industries, such as agriculture and any other branch of activity in which such specialization may be useful, in accordance with this provision of the Convention.
Article 10. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee asks the Government once again to supply a copy of the working paper entitled "Increasing the Transparency in the Labour Market" which has not been received in the ILO. Please also indicate any other measures taken or contemplated in order to encourage full voluntary use of employment service facilities and to give effect to this Article.
The Committee takes note of the information supplied by the Government in its reports received in 1991 and 1992, which contain the Government's comments concerning the observations made in November 1989 by the Malaysian Trades Union Congress on the application of the Convention.
Articles 3, 4 and 10. The Committee notes, in particular, the Government's statements according to which the Manpower Department constantly reviews the existing network of employment offices, and that the programmes and activities of the employment offices are constantly reviewed by the tripartite National Labour Advisory Council. It also notes that the tripartite Labour Market Information Technical Committee set up under the auspices of the National Labour Advisory Council has already started functioning and discussed, among other matters, a working paper entitled "Increasing the Transparency in the Labour Market" which touches upon the need to make more transparent the activities of the employment service so that more employers and workers could use the employment service facilities. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply a copy of this working paper with its next report.
Article 7. The Committee had noted in its previous comments from the above-mentioned communication of the MTUC that there is still no specialisation by occupation and by industries within the employment offices required under this Article and that the needs of special categories of applicants are yet to be adequately met. It also notes a brief indication in the Government's report, according to which special attention is provided for the registration and placement of handicapped people. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would describe in more detail the arrangements made for disabled persons and indicate, in its next report, measures taken or envisaged to give full effect to this Article, giving particulars concerning the occupations, industries and, eventually, other special categories of applicants for which specialised arrangements have been made.
The Committee notes that the Government's reply has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
The Committee noted the information supplied by the Government in its report. It also noted the observations made in November 1989 by the Malaysian Trades Union Congress concerning the application of Articles 3, 4, 7 and 10 of the Convention. These observations were sent to the Government by the Office on 24 November 1989, for such comments as might be judged appropriate. The Committee observes that no comments have been communicated by the Government so far. It hopes that the Government will include in its next report any comments it considers appropriate in order to enable the Committee to examine the questions raised by the above-mentioned organistion in substance at its next session.
[The Government is asked to report in detail for the period ending 30 June 1991.]
The Committee has noted the information supplied by the Government in its report. It has also noted the observations made in November 1989 by the Malaysian Trades Union Congress concerning the application of Articles 3, 4, 7 and 10 of the Convention. These observations were sent to the Government by the Office on 24 November 1989, for such comments as might be judged appropriate. The Committee observes that no comments have been communicated by the Government so far. It hopes that the Government will include in its next report any comments it considers appropriate in order to enable the Committee to examine the questions raised by the above-mentioned organistion in substance at its next session. [The Government is asked to report in detail for the period ending 30 June 1990.]