DISPLAYINFrench - Spanish
- 37. During its previous examination of the case, at its meeting in October 2013, the Committee requested the Government to keep it informed of the outcome of the application for judicial review filed by the United Trade Union of Academic Workers of CONALEP of the State of Jalisco (SUTACEJ) in respect of a ruling in favour of the Legitimate Academic Workers’ Union of CONALEP in the State of Jalisco (SILTACEJ) (the complainant) [see 370th Report, para. 587].
- 38. In their respective communications of 4 February and 23 May 2014, SILTACEJ and the Government reported that the Third Collegiate Labour Tribunal of the Third Circuit had upheld the ruling under review on 22 November 2013, thus revoking the indirect amparo (protection of constitutional rights) proceedings (No. 641/2013) filed by the Secretary-General of SUTACEJ. In addition, in its communication of 6 December 2016, the Government reported that the General Directorate of the National Technical Vocational Training College (CONALEP) in Jalisco had informed the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare (STPS) in April 2014 that it had signed an agreement with SILTACEJ enabling the latter to access CONALEP campuses.
- 39. The Committee takes due note of the information provided by the complainant and the Government. Observing that the court proceedings related to this case have ended favourably for the complainant, and that the complainant has furthermore signed an agreement with CONALEP on access to the latter’s campuses, the Committee will not pursue its examination of this case.
