ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments > All Comments

Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006) - Bosnia and Herzegovina (RATIFICATION: 2010)

DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish

CMNT_TITLE

Previous comment

The Committee notes the Government’s third report on the application of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, as amended (MLC, 2006). The Committee notes that the amendments to the Code approved by the International Labour Conference in 2016 and 2018 entered into force for Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) on 08 January 2019 and 26 December 2020, respectively.
Article I of the Convention. General questions on application. Implementing measures. The Committee takes note of the information provided by the Government, in reply to its previous comment, that the Internal and Maritime Navigation Act (No 73/05) contains parts relating to maritime ships and crews, which are covered by the Convention. The Committee observes however that the Government reiterates that Bosnia and Herzegovina does not have a merchant marine and that all seafarers are engaged on ships of other countries. The Government further informs that there were no changes in the legislation compared to the previous report, and that the Rulebook on maritime and ship’s books is the responsibility of authorities at the state level. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed on any future developments in the maritime sector, which would have a bearing on the application of the flag State requirements of the Convention.
Article II. Definitions and scope of application. Definition of seafarers and ships. In its reply to the Committee’s previous comment, the government indicates that there were no changes regarding definitions of terms that are the subject of the Internal and Maritime Navigation Act, as well as the existence of the required Certificate on work at sea, and the Declaration on meeting the working conditions of seafarers. The Government further reiterates its commitment to keep the Committee informed of any developments in this respect. The Committee requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures to ensure that any person employed, engaged or working in any capacity on board a ship to which the Convention applies is considered a seafarer for the purpose of implementing the requirements of the Convention.
Regulation 1.1 and the Code. Minimum age. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in reply to its previous comment, that Section 20 of the Labour Law of the Federation of BiH applies to all employment relations and prohibits individuals under 15 years from entering employment, while those aged 15 to 18 require consent from a legal representative and a medical certificate indicating their fitness for work. The Committee also notes that the Government reiterates that according to the Internal and Maritime Navigation Act, the minimum age for seafarers is 18 years. Referring to its comment under Article I, the Committee takes note of this information.
Regulation 1.4 and the Code. Recruitment and placement. In its reply to the Committee’s previous comment, the Government indicates that there are still no private recruitment and placement agencies in Bosnia and Herzegovina; seafarers look for a job on their own through agencies based mainly in Montenegro, Croatia or other European countries. The Government adds that the country has international agreements with Serbia and Slovenia regarding temporary employment but has not received requests to mediate the employment of seafarers on foreign-flagged ships under these agreements. The Committee requests the Government to continue to report on any future developments regarding the existence of recruitment and placement services in the country. In the absence of information in this respect in the Government’s report, the Committee reiterates its request for the Government to indicate how it gives effect to Standard A1.4, paragraph 8.
Regulation 4.5 and the Code. Social security. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in reply to its previous comment that there are still no shipowners’ “headquarters” in the country and that seafarers working on foreign flagged ships are therefore not covered under the national social security system. The government further states that, consistent with the majority of international treaties, the social security of seafarers is governed by the regulations of the country whose flag the vessels are operating under. The Committee recalls, in this connection, that labour-supplying countries have an obligation to ensure the implementation of the Convention’s requirements regarding the recruitment and placement and the social security protection of seafarers that are its nationals or are resident or are otherwise domiciled in its territory (Regulation 5.3 and the Code).The Committee accordingly requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures without delay, for example through bilateral agreements, to ensure that seafarers ordinarily resident in Bosnia and Herzegovina who are working on ships that fly the flag of another country, are provided with social security in the six branches specified by the Government when it ratified the Convention.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes the Government’s second report on the application of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, as amended (MLC, 2006). It notes that the amendments to the Code approved by the International Labour Conference in 2014, entered into force for Bosnia and Herzegovina on 18 January 2017. It further notes that the Government’s report was received before the entry into force of the 2014 amendments.
Article I of the Convention. General obligations. Implementing measures. The Committee noted the Government’s indication that Bosnia and Herzegovina does not have any specialized maritime legislation implementing the Convention and that there is no “mercantile marine or naval force”, to which the requirements under the Convention would apply. The Committee also noted the Government’s indication that there are 1,000 registered seafarers in its territory, all of whom are working on ships operating under the flag of other countries. The Committee notes that, according to the information provided by the Government, a process of adoption of legislation and regulations in the maritime field is under way at the state level in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Government indicates, in particular, that a Preliminary Draft Law on Maritime Domain and Maritime Navigation is under preparation to define, among others, the rights and duties of members of crews of seagoing ships. The Preliminary Draft Law refers also to the adoption of by-laws to regulate medical fitness of seafarers and working hours, among others. The Committee recalls that according to Article I of the Convention, each Member undertakes to give complete effect to its provisions in order to secure the right of all seafarers to decent employment. The Committee further recalls that under Regulation 5.3 on labour-supplying responsibilities, without prejudice to the principle of each Member’s responsibility for the working and living conditions of seafarers on ships that fly its flag, the Member also has a responsibility to ensure the implementation of the requirements of the Convention regarding the recruitment and placement of seafarers as well as the social security protection of seafarers that are its nationals or are resident in its territory. The Committee welcomes the announcement made by the Government regarding the adoption of legislation to implement the MLC, 2006, and requests it to provide information on the results of the ongoing process. The Committee also requests the Government to report on any future developments in the maritime sector, which would have a bearing on the application of the flag State requirements of the Convention.
Article II. Definitions and scope of application. Definition of seafarers and ships. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to provide information with respect to the applicable national legislation concerning the definition of seafarers and ships, including the extent to which the Internal and Maritime Navigation Act (No 73/05) may be relevant to the implementation of the requirements of the Convention. In its reply, while referring to some aspects of the Preliminary Draft Law, the Government indicates that no changes were made to the national legislation since its first report. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that any person employed, engaged or working in any capacity on board a ship to which the Convention applies is considered a seafarer for the purpose of implementing the requirements of the Convention.
Regulation 1.1 and the Code. Minimum age. In its previous comment, the Committee noted that the Government indicated that the minimum age for seafarers was 18 years, without identifying the relevant national provisions. It requested the Government to provide additional information with respect to the legislation establishing such minimum age. In its reply, the Government refers to section 57 of the Internal and Maritime Navigation Act which is however not relevant for the implementation of this Regulation as it relates to persons who operate a ship and not to seafarers working on board a ship. In the absence of clear provisions giving effect to Regulation 1.1 and Standard A1.1, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that no person below 16 years of age shall be employed or engaged or work on a ship. It further requests the Government to indicate the relevant provisions in existing legislation and/or regulations which prohibit night work and hazardous work for seafarers under 18.
Regulation 1.4 and the Code. Recruitment and placement. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the Government’s indication that there are no private or public services operating in the country to provide placement services for seafarers and that there is only a general system of public employment services for all workers. The Committee requested the Government to clarify the recruitment arrangements of 1,000 registered seafarers in Bosnia and Herzegovina who are engaged to work on foreign flagged ships and indicate the extent to which the general public employment service recruits or places seafarers. In its reply, the Government indicates that there are still no private recruitment and placement agencies in Bosnia and Herzegovina; seafarers look for a job on their own through agencies based mainly in Montenegro, Croatia or other European countries. The Committee requests the Government to report on any future developments regarding the existence of recruitment and placement services in the country. The Committee further requests the Government to indicate how it gives effect to Standard A1.4, paragraph 8 (measures to advise its nationals on the possible problems of signing on a ship that flies the flag of a country which has not ratified the Convention).
Regulation 4.5 and the Code. Social security. The Committee recalls that, upon depositing its instrument of ratification of the Convention in accordance with Standard A4.5, paragraphs 2 and 10, the Government specified the following branches of social security: medical care, sickness benefit, unemployment benefit, old-age benefit, employment injury benefit, maternity benefit, and survivors’ benefit. The Committee noted the Government’s indication that it does not provide protection in any of the branches of social security to seafarers ordinarily resident in its territory. It further explained that social security protection is linked to the employer’s headquarters: if the employer’s headquarters are located in Bosnia and Herzegovina, then the national social security applies, irrespective of the employee’s residence. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is still no shipowners’ “headquarters” in the country and that seafarers working on foreign flagged ships are therefore not covered under the national security system. The Committee recalls that pursuant to Standard A4.5, paragraph 3, each Member shall take steps according to its national circumstances to provide the complementary social security protection on the branches specified at the time of ratification to all seafarers ordinarily resident in its territory. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to implement Regulation 4.5 and ensure that all seafarers ordinarily resident in Bosnia and Herzegovina are provided with social security protection in the branches specified by the Government.

CMNT_TITLE

General questions on application. Implementing measures. The Committee notes the first report provided by the Government on the application of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006). The Committee recalls that, in addition to the fundamental and governance Conventions, Bosnia and Herzegovina has previously ratified and provided article 22 reports on the application of 12 maritime labour Conventions, all of which were automatically denounced on entry into force of the MLC, 2006 for Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Committee notes that the Government indicates, as it has previously, that Bosnia and Herzegovina does not have any specialized maritime legislation implementing the Convention and that it has no “mercantile marine or naval force”, to which the requirements under the Convention would apply, even if legislation was adopted. The Government also indicates, as it has in the past, that there are “1,000 registered seafarers” in its territory, all of whom are working on ships operating under the flag of other countries and, that, there are no registered seafarers’ or shipowners’ organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Committee notes that similar information was provided by the Government in 2011 in its first report on the application of the Seafarers’ Identity Documents Convention (Revised), 2003 (No. 185), although, at that time, the Government also indicated that “the establishment of a maritime administration and development at the state level were in process and that institutional arrangement and the adoption of laws would regulate the issue of the Register of Ships and the ‘state flag’ and other issues”. The Committee notes that the Government’s recent (2014) information with respect to Convention No. 185 and the MLC, 2006, does not contain the same information regarding the establishment of a maritime administration.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is no applicable maritime law and that it has not taken any steps to adopt legislation to implement the Convention, although it has provided information on the Labour Law and other regulations that could be relevant to the question of application. However, the Committee notes that in 2005 the Government adopted the Internal and Maritime Navigation Act (No. 73/05) and that the Government has listed this Act as one of the implementing laws and regulations but does not refer to any specific provisions in the Act as implementing any of the requirements under this Convention.
The Committee also notes that the Government refers to a lack of access to the sea for two of its entities. However, the Committee observes that, although this information is relevant to port State responsibilities and other obligations relating to access to shore-based facilities, the Convention contains a number of important requirements that are primarily directed to Members in their role as countries with labour-supplying responsibilities. In this respect, the Committee notes that, even if Bosnia and Herzegovina does not currently have a ship registry or operate as a flag State for ships to which the Convention requirements would apply, it still has responsibilities to apply these other requirements, in accordance with the Convention. As discussed in greater detail below, the Committee notes at the outset the two most important labour-supplying responsibilities: the obligation to exercise jurisdiction and control over seafarer recruitment and placement services, if they exist in the Members’ territory; and the obligation of each Member to take steps according to its national circumstance to provide at least three branches of social security to all seafarers ordinarily resident in its territory.
The Committee recalls that in its previous comments on the application of maritime labour Conventions, the Committee has taken note of the Government’s information about the situation in the maritime sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina and has requested the Government to continue to provide information on any changes in the present situation and to report on any future developments in the maritime sector, which would have a bearing on the application of the Convention. As noted above the Government indicates that the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina has not changed. The Committee notes the importance of the Government taking steps to move forward to implement the MLC, 2006, in its laws or regulations and other measures, particularly on the matters identified below. Accordingly the Committee strongly encourages the Government to avail itself of ILO technical assistance. The Committee also requests the Government to report on any future developments in the maritime sector, which would have a bearing on the application of the flag State requirements of the Convention.
General questions on application. Article II, paragraph 1(f) and (i). Definition of seafarers and ships. The Committee notes the Government’s information with respect to the number of registered seafarers and the information that the definition of seafarer covers any person employed in any capacity on board a ship. However, the Committee notes that it is not clear whether legislation exists that defines a seafarer for the purpose of registration. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication, in the report it submitted in 2014 on Convention No. 185, that there is an instrument described as a Rule Book on Maritime and Ship Booklets (Nos 14/01 and 31/10). The former has previously been the subject of direct requests for further information as the Committee did not, and still does not, have access to that legislation. As noted above, the Government also indicates that there is no “mercantile marine or naval forces” to which the Convention would apply; however, there is no information provided on the definition of these terms or on the kinds of ships that are regulated by the Internal and Maritime Navigation Act (No. 73/05). In that respect the Committee also notes the statistical data provided by the Government which indicates that there are 300 seafarers working on ships that are covered by the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information with respect to these matters, including the extent to which the Internal and Maritime Navigation Act (No. 73/05) may be relevant to the implementation of the requirements in the Convention.
Regulation 1.1 and the Code. Minimum age. Regulation 1.2 and the Code. Medical certificate. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that the minimum age for seafarers is 18 years and, therefore, the provisions regarding night work and restrictions on work for seafarers under 18 years and, in connection with shorter validity periods of medical certificates for seafarers under 18 years, are not relevant. The Committee notes, in this respect, that the Government has not identified its national legislation establishing the minimum age of 18 years for seafarers. The Committee recalls that, under Convention No. 16, the Government has indicated that the Labour Law contains relevant protections for minor workers between the ages of 15 and 18 years. It also recalls that, under Convention No. 185, the Government has indicated that its “shipping or seamans’ booklet” contains information on seafarer’s employment records, identity and qualifications that, in accordance with the Rules, can be issued to a person “who is aged 16”. The Committee requests the Government to provide additional information with respect to the legislation establishing the minimum age of 18 for seafarers.
Regulation 1.4 and the Code. Recruitment and placement. Regulation 5.3 and the Code. Labour-supplying responsibilities. Article V, paragraph 5. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there are no private or public services operating in the country to provide placement services for seafarers and that there is only a general system of public employment services for all workers. However, the Committee also notes the Government’s indication that there are about “1,000 seafarers registered in its entire territory”, engaged on foreign-flagged ships. The Committee recalls that, although Regulation 1.4 and the Code have several provisions that are flag State responsibilities, it is primarily directed to Members that have recruitment and placement services operating in their territory, which is usually the place of residence of the seafarers that are recruited. The Committee also recalls that the Convention, does not require that such services be established but, in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article V, if they exist in the Member’s territory, then “Each Member shall effectively exercise jurisdiction and control” over them. This would include the obligations set out in Regulation 1.4 and the Code, and the enforcement obligations set out in Regulation 5.3 and paragraph 1 of Standard A5.3, with due consideration given to Guideline B5.3.
The Committee notes that it is not clear from the information provided by the Government how the 1,000 registered seafarers in the territory are engaged to work on foreign-flagged ships. The Government’s reference to registration suggests that there is a system in place for registering seafarers and identifying them as seafarers. In that respect, the Committee recalls, as noted above, the reference to the “seamans’ booklet” under the Rule Book on Maritime and Ship Booklets. The Committee further notes that the Government has not indicated the extent to which the general public employment service might be providing this service to seafarers and shipowners. If it is operating as a seafarer recruitment or placement service, then the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the requirement under paragraph 1 of Standard A1.4, to ensure that it “is operated in an orderly manner that protects and promotes seafarers’ employment rights as provided for in this Convention” and that due consideration is to be given to the provisions in Guideline B1.4. The Committee requests the Government to provide information regarding the process by which seafarers obtain work on ships flying the flag of another country and to provide information regarding the extent to which the general public employment service may recruit or place seafarers.
Regulation 2.1 and the Code. Seafarers’ employment agreement. The Committee notes that Government’s indication that, since it does not have a lex specialis regulation for seafarers, the provisions of the Convention, are implemented through the general Labour Law. The Committee recalls that although the requirements in Regulation 2.1 and the Code are primarily directed to flag States (see paragraph 1 of Standard A2.1), to the extent that seafarers may be entering into employment agreements in the Member’s territory, that are possibly governed by its national law, then the requirements in Regulation 2.1 and the Code would need to be implemented in legislation. Although the Convention does not establish a standard format for a seafarers’ employment agreement, the agreements must include the matters set out in paragraph 4 of Standard A2.1. The Committee notes that, since an example of an employment agreement was not provided by the Government, it is not possible to assess the extent to which agreements regulated by the Labour Law are consistent with Regulation 2.1 and the Code.
The Committee also notes that the Government has not provided an example of the document that contains the record of employment as required under paragraphs 1(c) and 3 of Standard A2.1. However, it notes that the Government’s information on Convention No. 185 refers to the Rule Book on Maritime and Shipping Booklets (Nos 14/01 and 31/10). Nevertheless it is not clear whether this booklet would be considered as the document that implements the requirements in Standard A2.1 regarding the record of employment.
The Committee notes the Government’s statement that seafarers are not obliged to sign agreements. However, as noted above, the Government has not provided information as to whether seafarers enter into employment agreements in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and if they do, whether, in accordance with paragraph 2 of Regulation 2.1, a law or regulation requires that they are given an opportunity to review and seek advice on the terms and conditions before signing.
The Committee also notes that the Government’s indication that the Labour Law allows for shorter notice periods and termination without notice in some specific circumstances. However, the Government has not indicated whether this would also take account of seafarers’ need for shorter notice periods for compassionate or other urgent needs, as required under paragraph 6 of Standard A2.1. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on these matters and to provide an example of the approved document for the seafarers’ record of employment.
Regulation 2.8 and the Code. Career and skill development and opportunities for seafarers’ employment. The Committee notes that the Government’s report provides no information concerning career and skill development and opportunities for seafarers’ employment. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Regulation 2.8 and the Code, which require the adoption, by all Members who have seafarers domiciled in their territories, of policies to encourage career and skill development and employment opportunities for seafarers. The Committee requests the Government to provide information with respect to any policies that it has adopted to encourage career and skill development and employment opportunities for seafarers domiciled in its territory.
Regulation 4.5 and the Code. Social security. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that it does not provide any of the branches of social security to seafarers ordinarily resident in its territory. The Committee also notes that the Government indicates that social security is linked to the employer’s headquarters and if the employer’s headquarters are located in Bosnia and Herzegovina then the national social security applies, irrespective of the employee’s residence, and that family members are also covered, if they are eligible under the national law. The Government explains, however, that “social security is not linked to the residence of seafarers or workers in general but to the seat of employers and, in accordance with international agreements, the social security is linked to the country whose flag the ship flies. Consequently it is not even theoretically possible for the said person not to have adequate social security.” In that respect the Committee notes that Government’s information that there are 1,000 registered seafarers in its territory engaged to work on foreign-flagged ships and that there is no “mercantile marine or naval force” to which the Convention would apply.
The Committee notes that if there are no employers’ (shipowners’) headquarters located in Bosnia and Herzegovina, then it would seem that the seafarers working on foreign-flagged ships may not be covered under the national social security system. Moreover, the Committee notes that, while the Government refers to 21 bilateral agreements relating to social security, it is not clear whether they apply to the 1,000 registered seafarers ordinarily resident in its territory. It does not appear, therefore, that the Government is implementing the requirements under paragraphs 2 and 3 of Standard A4.5 which require each Member to take steps according to its national circumstances to provide at least three branches of social security to all seafarers ordinarily resident in its territory.
The Committee recalls that, upon depositing its instrument of ratification of the Convention in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 10 of Standard A4.5, the Government specified the following branches of social security: medical care, sickness benefit, unemployment benefit, old-age benefit, employment injury benefit, maternity benefit, and survivors’ benefit. The Committee also recalls that this obligation may be implemented in a number of ways, as set out in paragraphs 3 and 7 of Standard A4.5, and that the attribution of responsibility may also be the subject of bilateral and multilateral agreements adopted within the framework of a regional economic integration organization, as provided under paragraph 4 of Standard A4.5. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on how it is implementing its obligations under paragraphs 2 and 3 of Standard A4.5 to provide social security protection in at least three branches to seafarers ordinarily resident in its territory, and in particular, whether the bilateral agreements it has adopted address this matter and ensure that seafarers ordinarily resident in Bosnia and Herzegovina who are working on ships that the fly the flag of another country, are provided with social security in the six branches specified by the Government when it ratified the Convention.
[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2016.]
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer