National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Previous comment
Repetition The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report in reply to its previous requests concerning Articles 6 and 12 of the Convention, with regard to the elimination of the most frequent causes of occupational accidents, Article 9(3), regarding the appropriate training of labour inspectors, and Article 13 regarding the promotion of collaboration between officials of the labour inspectorate of agriculture and employers and workers. Articles 26 and 27. Annual inspection report. While noting the information on the agriculture sector contained in the extract from the 2014 annual report of the Department of Labour, and the 2014 review of statistics on occupational accidents and diseases, attached to the Government’s report on Convention No. 81, the Committee requests the Government to ensure that an annual report on the work of the inspection services in agriculture, containing information on the matters covered by Article 27(a)–(g), is published and communicated regularly to the Office within the period prescribed in Article 26, either as a separate report or as part of its general annual report.
Referring also to its observation, the Committee notes the Government’s report and asks the Government to provide additional information relating to the following points.
1. Articles 14 and 16 of the Convention. Number of labour inspectors and protection of agricultural workers. The Committee notes that the table referring to labour inspection activity in the agricultural sector indicates a significant reduction in the number of agricultural establishments visited in 2005, in comparison to previous years. The difference is particularly noticeable in respect of aquaculture undertakings, where the reported rate of occupational accidents remains very high. Since the same inspectors perform their duties in all of the sectors covered, the Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that agricultural undertakings benefit from the current and future reinforcement of the number of labour inspectors, including through the appointment of medical inspectors, and to communicate, in its next report, information on any progress made, notably with regard to hazardous agricultural activities.
2. Article 13. Collaboration of employers’ and workers’ organizations. The Committee requests the Government to communicate information on the measures taken or envisaged to promote effective collaboration with agricultural employers’ and workers’ organizations for the purposes set forth in the Convention.
3. Article 27. Annual inspection report. While noting the efforts made to present statistics on inspection visits, observations and statistics on occupational accidents in agricultural undertakings, the Committee asks the Government to take measures to ensure that this information is supplemented, in the part of the annual report which relates to the agricultural sector, with information on the number of undertakings liable to labour inspection, the number of persons working in these undertakings, the violations committed and penalties imposed and the occupational diseases and their causes, in such way as to enable the central authority to evaluate the effectiveness of the inspection system in terms of needs and determine the steps to be taken to improve it.
Referring also to its observation concerning Convention No. 81, the Committee notes with satisfaction that, further to its numerous requests, the Government has taken the necessary measures to ensure that information on inspection service activities in the agricultural sector appears separately in the annual activity report that also covers industrial and commercial establishments.
The Committee is addressing a direct request to the Government concerning a number of points.
The Committee refers the Government to its observation and notes with interest that in future, the annual activities report will contain a special section on activities in the sectors covered by Convention No. 129.
It hopes that all possible information will be supplied in full on the items listed in Article 27 of the Convention and on any other questions concerning the operation of the labour inspectorate in agricultural enterprises.
Noting that the number of occupational accidents in agriculture and pearl farming remains high, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would give a breakdown of these accidents between agriculture, fishing and pearl farming and, if possible, indicate the nature and cause of such accidents, reporting to the ILO any measure to improve safety at work in the agricultural sector or any obstacles encountered in this area.
The Committee refers the Government to its observation on Convention No. 81, particularly with regard to developments in the labour inspection system arising from the transfer of competence for labour law to French Polynesia, and notes with satisfaction the report sent by the Government in response to its previous comments which shows the efforts made in sending specific information on the operation of the inspection system in agriculture.
The Committee raises other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee notes the Government’s reports for the period ending in May 2002.
With reference to its observation of 1998, the Committee notes once again that the information provided by the Government is too vague to serve as a basis for any assessment of the extent to which this Convention is applied.
For example, under Article 21 of the Convention, which provides that agricultural enterprises shall be inspected as often and as thoroughly as is necessary to ensure the effective application of the relevant legislation, the Government states: "As far as the resources for labour inspection in French Polynesia allow, agricultural enterprises are inspected under the same conditions as enterprises in the other branches of activity." The annual labour inspection report for agriculture for 2001 mentions five inspections in enterprises and 41 violations reported for 180 persons covered while the Government indicates for its part that for the first quarter of 2002, six inspections were carried out in the agricultural sector, that they resulted in 24 violations reported for 75 wage-earners employed in these enterprises, but that these numbers overlap with those of the fishing and pearl farming sectors.
The ratification of this Convention carries with it, in accordance with article 22 of the ILO Constitution, an obligation to report every two years on the measures taken in view of its application. In its report, the Government has to provide the specific information requested by the report form established by the ILO Governing Body under each of the provisions of the instrument. Furthermore, the Government has to ensure that the central authority for labour inspection produces an annual activity report in such a manner that the information requested by each of the items of Article 27, and specific to its activities in the agricultural enterprises covered, is easily identified so as to serve as a basis for assessing the extent to which the Convention is applied.
According to the information available on the Internet site of the Overseas Ministry, agriculture in French Polynesia helps to sustain the population of the archipelago, with the most recent census indicating the existence of 6,200 farms with 12,000 permanent workers and more than 600 seasonal workers. It indicates that copra ensures a livelihood for more than 10,000 persons and covers almost three-quarters of the cultivated land area. Fruit and vegetable farms, pig raising and egg production are the other important activities of the region as cattle raising faces strong competition from imports from New Zealand and metropolitan France. It therefore appears to be quite justified from an economic and social point of view for the labour inspection system to be developed in agricultural enterprises in order to ensure the application of legislation respecting the working conditions and protection of a relatively important portion of the working population. This Convention envisages, under Article 7, paragraph 3(a), the possibility of organizing labour inspection in agriculture in the framework of a single labour inspectorate responsible for all sectors of economic activity, while requiring at the same time in Article 14 that arrangements shall be made to ensure that the number of labour inspectors in agriculture is sufficient to secure the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate and is determined with due regard for:
(a) the importance of the duties which inspectors have to perform, in particular:
(i) the number, nature, size and situation of the agricultural enterprises liable to inspection;
(ii) the number and classes of persons working in such enterprises; and
(iii) the number and complexity of the legal provisions to be enforced;
(b) the material means placed at the disposal of the inspectors; and
(c) the practical conditions under which visits of inspection must be carried out in order to be effective.
The information in the Government’s report indicates that the management of the inspection services (the Director, the Assistant Director and the only inspector) are personnel on temporary assignment from metropolitan France and are periodically renewed at the end of each assignment, whereas the two labour supervisors are territorial agents recruited either by competitive or professional examination, or internal transfer within the territorial administration. The recruitment of a medical labour officer and of a woman employee under contract as labour supervisors has also been announced. Furthermore, the Government indicates that it has asked the Central Mission for the Support and Coordination of Decentralized Services (MICAPCOR) for support in order to assess the means to be made available to the labour inspectorate and envisages reinforcing the supervision of health and safety in agriculture in 2002 by increasing the number of inspections compared to the previous years. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supplement this information by indicating any measures actually taken to give effect to the provisions of Articles 14, 15, 19, 21 and 25, relating to the application of the Convention in agricultural enterprises, and if it would ensure that the information specific to the activities of the inspection services in agriculture, as envisaged under Article 27, is easy to identify in the annual inspection report published by the central authority.
The Committee takes note of the Government's reports covering the period from 1 July 1995 to 30 June 1997. It also takes note of the copies of annual inspection reports provided for the same period, and the 1995 agricultural census document attached to the previous report on the application of the Convention.
The Committee notes with regret that the last two reports received do not contain any information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in the establishments covered by the Convention and that the annual inspection reports to which the Government refers do not refer to any of the subjects listed in points (a) to (g) of Article 27 concerning the agricultural sector.
With reference to its previous comments, in which it reiterated its request for detailed information on labour inspection in agriculture in the light of the points raised in 1985 in relation to Convention No. 81, the Committee recalls that it had expressed the hope that action would be taken to enable the labour inspection service to meet all its obligations throughout the territory. Given that the labour inspection service operates in all sectors of the economy, this referred implicitly to labour inspection in agriculture, since issues relating to human and material resources and the status of labour inspectors must be regulated in the same way for all the sectors covered by the service. The information supplied on these points in the annual inspection reports is general information for all sectors, and provides no useful indication as to the degree to which the provisions of the Convention are applied in the agricultural sector, on which the Government's most recent information was contained in its reports of 1991 and 1993. The Committee wishes to point out in this regard that, under Article 4 of the Convention, the system of labour inspection in agriculture shall apply to agricultural undertakings in which employees or apprentices work, however they may be remunerated and whatever the type, form or duration of their contract, and that under Article 21, agricultural undertakings must be inspected as often and as thoroughly as is necessary to ensure the effective application of the relevant legal provisions. The argument put forward by the Government in its report of 1993, that the very low level of activity by the inspection service in this sector is explained by the limited number of agricultural employees who have contributed to the Social Security Fund, is not relevant with regard to these provisions of the Convention, and suggests that the criteria used for identifying agricultural undertakings subject to labour inspection should be re-examined.
Noting recent developments in the situation of the labour inspection service characterized by conceptual and organizational difficulties faced by the decentralized state services and the territorial authorities, the Committee trusts that the Government will soon be in a position to report on positive developments in the situation with regard to the objectives of the Convention, and that it will be able to provide information on any progress made in giving effect to the provisions of the Convention, in accordance with the obligations imposed by the declaration of application of the instrument.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
The Committee refers to various matters raised under Convention No. 81 and requests the Government to supply full details also as regards labour inspection in agriculture.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows: