National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Gender remuneration gap. The Committee notes from the Employment Survey Report published by the Statistics Office that the gender remuneration gap for 2009, based on average monthly earnings for full-time jobs was 27 per cent. Based on average weekly earnings for full-time employees, the gap increases to 33 per cent. The Committee notes that in some industries the gap is particularly high (based on average monthly earnings for full-time jobs), including in financial intermediation (46.4 per cent) and health and social work (40 per cent), and in occupations such as managers and senior officials (29 per cent). Noting the wide gender remuneration gap, and that the Government provides no information in this regard in response to its previous request, the Committee urges the Government to take measures to analyse and address the causes of the gender remuneration gap, including studies and surveys, and to provide detailed information in this regard. Please also continue to provide information on the earnings of men and women in the various industries and occupations, in both the public and private sectors.
Article 1 of the Convention. The Committee noted previously the provisions of the Equal Opportunities Act, 2006, related to equal remuneration for work of equal value, and asked for information on the implementation and enforcement thereof. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there have been no relevant court cases or violations detected regarding the principle of the Convention. The Committee once again asks the Government to provide specific information regarding the practical implementation and enforcement of section 31 of the Equal Opportunities Act. Noting the absence of cases and violations detected or reported, the Committee asks the Government to take specific measures to promote awareness of the equal remuneration provisions and the dispute resolution procedures available, among workers, employers and their representatives, as well as government officials. Please provide specific information on the measures taken to enhance the capacity of the responsible authorities, including judges, labour inspectors and other public officials, to identify and address issues concerning section 31 of the Equal Opportunities Act.
Article 2. Collective agreements, minimum wages. The Committee recalls that, pursuant to section 63(2)(a) and (b) of the Equal Opportunities Act, terms contained in a collective agreement or any rule made by an employer are void where “the making of the collective agreement is, by reason of the inclusion of the term, unlawful by virtue of this Act” or “the term or rule is included or made in furtherance of an act which is unlawful by virtue of this Act”. Noting that the Government provides no information in response to its previous request, the Committee once again asks the Government to indicate whether section 63 renders void terms of collective agreements or terms or rules of undertakings that violate the right to equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value. The Committee would also welcome receiving copies of collective agreements that contain specific clauses regarding equal remuneration for work of equal value. Noting that the Conditions of Employment (Standard Minimum Wage) Order, 2001, as amended in 2008, excludes domestic workers, the Committee asks the Government to provide information on the number of men and women employed as domestic workers, and how it is ensured that the work of these workers is not undervalued.
Article 3. Objective job evaluation. The Committee notes that the Government has provided no information regarding the promotion and use of methods for the objective evaluation of jobs, as previously requested. Noting that the Equal Opportunities Act refers to notions of “work rated as equivalent” and “work of equal value”, the Committee asks the Government to take measures to promote the development and use of objective job evaluation methods, and draws the Government’s attention to its 2006 general observation in this regard.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:
Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Legislative developments. The Committee notes that the Equal Opportunities Act, 2006, entered into force on 1 March 2007. Section 31 provides for equal pay for men and women for like work, equivalent work, or work which is in terms of the demands (for instance under such headings as effort, skill and decision) of equal value. The Committee notes with interest that the provision explicitly incorporates the notion of work of equal value and that pay is defined broadly (section 31(6)(a)), in accordance with the Convention. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the implementation and enforcement of section 31 of the Equal Opportunities Act, including information on any cases brought before the courts and their outcomes. It also asks the Government to indicate measures taken to promote awareness of the Act’s equal pay provisions.
The Committee recalls that the Convention does not limit the application of the principle of equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value to the level of the enterprise or undertaking. In this regard, the Committee notes that section 31 allows men and women to bring equal pay claims against their employers using comparators employed by the same employer or by any associated employer in Gibraltar in which common terms and conditions of employment are observed either generally or for employees of the relevant classes. Two employers are considered to be associated if one is a company of which the other (directly or indirectly) has control, or if both are companies of which a third person has (directly or indirectly) control. In addition, the Committee notes that under section 63 of the Act, terms contained in a collective agreement or any rule made by an employer are void where “the making of the collective agreement is, by reason of the inclusion of the term, unlawful by virtue of this Act” or “the term or rule is included or made in furtherance of an act which is unlawful by virtue of this Act” (section 63(2)(a) and (b)). The Committee asks the Government to indicate whether section 63 renders void terms of collective agreements or terms or rules of undertakings that violate the right to equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value.
Assessment of the gender pay gap. The Committee notes from the Employment Survey Report published by the Statistics Office in March 2008 that the gender wage gap for October 2007 (average monthly earnings for full-time work) was as wide as 31 per cent. The gender pay gap was wider in the private sector (33.3 per cent) than in the public sector (26.7 per cent). As regards the different industries, the gender pay gap was particularly wide in “financial intermediation” (47.6 per cent). The Committee asks the Government to provide updated information on the earnings of women and men that would allow the Committee to assess the progress made in closing the wide gender pay gap. In this regard, the Committee also asks the Government to provide detailed information on the measures taken to analyse and correct the causes of the continuing income gap between men and women and the results achieved by such measures.
Article 3. Objective job evaluation. Noting that the Equal Opportunities Act’s equal pay provisions refers to the notions of “work rated as equivalent” and “work of equal value” in terms of the demands made on the employee, the Committee asks the Government to provide information on any measures taken or envisaged to promote the development and use of methods for the objective evaluation of jobs, in accordance with Article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.
1. Pay differentials between men and women. The Committee previously noted from the figures in the Employment Survey of 2002 that there was hardly any industry where the average earnings of monthly paid full-time work for women was equivalent to or higher than men’s; nor were there any occupations in which women earned the same as men, in either the public or private sector. Substantial pay differentials (16 per cent) also existed in the wholesale and retail industry, and between Moroccan and Spanish women and men in monthly paid full-time employment (up to 30 per cent less).
2. In addition, the Committee noted greater discrepancies between the earnings of male and female managers or senior officials as well as administrative and secretarial employees working full time and paid on a monthly basis and those paid on a weekly basis. Monthly paid female managers and senior officials and administrative and secretarial employees were paid on average 29 and 20 per cent less than their male counterparts respectively; for weekly paid managers and senior officials and administrative and secretarial employees, the pay differential was 18 and 10 per cent respectively for the same occupations. These differentials in weekly earnings even continued to exist despite the small differences in hours of work. In the absence of any information in the Government’s report on the abovementioned situation, the Committee asks the Government to provide information, in its next report:
(a) on the measures taken to analyze and correct the causes of the continuing income gap between men and women and to report on the results achieved.
(b) explaining why the differences in weekly and monthly payments impact negatively on the earnings of women, particularly those working as managers and senior officials as well as administrative and secretarial employees.
(c) on what is generally being done to address the wage differentials between men and women, including the promotion of women into higher paid positions.
3. Article 3. Job evaluation. The Committee must reiterate its request for information relating to the establishment of systems for comparative job evaluation or any other action taken to re-evaluate the remuneration levels of jobs in which women predominate to remove the direct or systematic sex bias in the calculation or methods of wage fixing.
1. Part III of the report form. Practical application. The Committee notes from the 2002 Employment Survey that although average monthly earnings for women in full-time work have again increased at a greater rate than those for men between October 2001 and 2002, increasing by 2.1 per cent compared with 1.6 per cent for men, the pay differential between men and women remains substantial. In April 1998, men earned on average £382.68 per month more than women, whereas in October 2002, they earned on average £602.74 per month more than women. The Committee notes that in fact there is not a single industry where the average earnings of monthly paid full-time work for women is equivalent to or higher than men’s earnings. Nor are there any occupations in which women earn the same as men, in either the public or private sector. The only exceptions to this situation are weekly paid part-time work, where women managers and senior officials earn 9 per cent more than men, and women administrative and secretarial employees earn 22 per cent more than men. However, women in the wholesale and retail industry, which employs the largest proportion of weekly paid female part-time workers (over 35 per cent) earn 16 per cent less than the average earnings of part-time working men. The Committee also notes that Moroccan and Spanish women in monthly paid full-time employment earn significantly less than men of the same nationality (up to 30 per cent less).
2. The Committee notes that there appear to be greater discrepancies between the earnings of men and women working full time and paid on a monthly basis than those employed full time but paid on a weekly basis. The statistics indicate that monthly paid full-time female managers and senior officials are on average paid 29 per cent less than male monthly paid managers and senior officials, whereas those in weekly paid equivalent occupations are paid 18 per cent less than men. Also, monthly paid full-time female administrative and secretarial employees are paid 20 per cent less than men in the same occupation whereas those in weekly paid equivalent positions are paid 10 per cent less than men. The Committee asks the Government to provide further information explaining why the different payment schedules impact negatively on the earnings of women.
3. The Government has previously indicated that the lack of parity between the average wage earned by men and women in full-time employment is due in the main to the fact that men predominate in the better paid positions and work longer hours. However, the Committee notes that 5 per cent of both women and men are in weekly paid full-time work as managers or senior officials. Whereas men working as managers or senior officials earn on average weekly earnings of £343.41 for average weekly hours of 40.9, women earn only £272.81 for average weekly hours of 39.6. Accounting for the small difference in hours worked, women are still earning 18 per cent less than men in the same occupation. Similarly, in weekly paid full-time administrative and secretarial work, men are paid on average 10 per cent more than women even accounting for the extra three hours on average worked overtime.
4. Article 2 of the Convention. Measures to promote equal remuneration. In light of the above, the Committee hopes the Government will be in a position to analyse and try to correct the causes of the continuing income gap between men and women and to promote women’s access to higher paid positions. The Government is asked to provide information on all measures taken towards this end and the results of such action.
5. Article 3. Job appraisals. The Committee also reiterates its request for information relating to the establishment of systems for comparative job evaluation or any other action taken to re-evaluate the remuneration levels of jobs in which women predominate to remove the direct or systematic sex bias in the calculation or methods of wage fixing.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
1. The Committee notes with interest from the Employment Survey 1998, published by the Government of Gibraltar, that average monthly earnings for men in full-time work increased by £24.73 between April 1997 and April 1998, while women’s average monthly earnings for full-time work increased by £44 for the same period. The monthly average earnings for full-time women workers were £1,216.80 in April 1998, while full-time male workers earned a monthly average wage of £1,599.48, with men thus earning on average £382.68 more than women per month. Out of a total of 1,509 part-time workers, 76.21 per cent were women workers. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would continue to provide the data available, in surveys, reports or other documents, on the participation of male and female workers by category and sector of employment, and in the labour market as a whole, as well as data on the hours worked by male and female workers. The Committee also asks the Government to report on the measures taken or envisaged to continue to promote the application of the Convention, including measures to promote and facilitate access by women workers to positions offering higher levels of remuneration, where they continue to remain underrepresented. 2. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to transmit any information relating to the establishment of systems for comparative job evaluation.
1. The Committee notes with interest from the Employment Survey 1998, published by the Government of Gibraltar, that average monthly earnings for men in full-time work increased by £24.73 between April 1997 and April 1998, while women’s average monthly earnings for full-time work increased by £44 for the same period. The monthly average earnings for full-time women workers were £1,216.80 in April 1998, while full-time male workers earned a monthly average wage of £1,599.48, with men thus earning on average £382.68 more than women per month. Out of a total of 1,509 part-time workers, 76.21 per cent were women workers. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would continue to provide the data available, in surveys, reports or other documents, on the participation of male and female workers by category and sector of employment, and in the labour market as a whole, as well as data on the hours worked by male and female workers. The Committee also asks the Government to report on the measures taken or envisaged to continue to promote the application of the Convention, including measures to promote and facilitate access by women workers to positions offering higher levels of remuneration, where they continue to remain underrepresented.
2. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to transmit any information relating to the establishment of systems for comparative job evaluation.
The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report and the detailed statistical information attached.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which reads as follows:
1. The Committee notes that in response to its question regarding the measures taken to ensure that payments made above the minimum wage fixed by collective agreements are paid in accordance with the Convention, the Government indicates that the 1994 Employment Regulations require the registration of the "Notice of the Terms of Engagement" in respect of any employee commencing employment with an employer registered in Gibraltar. The Employment and Training Unit, responsible for registrations, is able to verify compliance with the Convention of remunerations. The Committee also notes compliance with the Convention of sections 52(a)-52(g) of the Employment and Training Ordinance, which incorporate into national legislation European Community Council Directives Nos. 76/207 of 9 February 1976 on the principle of equal treatment and 75/117 of 10 February 1975 on the principle of equal pay. In particular and from a legal perspective, the Committee notes that under these provisions any person who considers him/herself victim of an act which violates the principle of equal remuneration may lodge a complaint with the Industrial Tribunal. Similarly, the Committee notes the powers vested in labour inspectors to ensure application of the legislation in force. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide details of any complaints lodged with the Industrial Tribunal or violations observed which have been based on these provisions and the subsequent decisions handed down.
2. The Committee notes the Government’s statement to the effect that the lack of parity between the average wage earned by men and women in full-time employment is due, in the main, to the fact that men predominate in the better paid positions, and work longer hours. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would transmit the data available, in surveys, reports or other such documents, on the participation of male and female workers according to category and sector of employment and in the labour market as well as data on the hours worked by male and female workers. The Committee also requests the Government to continue to provide statistics on salaries and wages paid to male and female workers in the private and public sectors and to report on the measures taken or envisaged to promote and facilitate access by female workers to positions offering higher levels of remuneration, where they continue to remain unrepresented. In this regard, the Committee requests the Government to refer to its 1998 general observation on this Convention.
3. Finally, the Committee requests the Government to transmit any information relating to the establishment of systems for comparative job evaluation.
The Committee notes the information contained in the Government's report.
2. The Committee notes the Government's statement to the effect that the lack of parity between the average wage earned by men and women in full-time employment is due, in the main, to the fact that men predominate in the better paid positions, and work longer hours. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would transmit the data available, in surveys, reports or other such documents, on the participation of male and female workers according to category and sector of employment and in the labour market as well as data on the hours worked by male and female workers. The Committee also requests the Government to continue to provide statistics on salaries and wages paid to male and female workers in the private and public sectors and to report on the measures taken or envisaged to promote and facilitate access by female workers to positions offering higher levels of remuneration, where they continue to remain unrepresented. In this regard, the Committee requests the Government to refer to its 1998 general observation on this Convention.
The Committee notes the information contained in the Government's report and the attached job classifications and salary scales applying in the public service.
1. The Committee notes the explanations concerning the application of the equal remuneration provision (section 52c) of the Employment (Amendment) Ordinance 1989. In this regard, it notes that the provision is applied also through collective agreements, negotiated annually for the private and public sectors. Please indicate the measures taken to ensure that payments made above the minimum wage rates fixed by collective agreements are paid in accordance with the Convention. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would furnish samples of some collective agreements applying in the public sector, which were unfortunately not received with the report.
2. The Committee notes from the 1994 Abstract of Statistics, published by the Government of Gibraltar, that as at April 1994, men's average earnings for full-time work exceeded women's by some 40.6 per cent. Please indicate, if possible, the reasons for the wage gap, particularly in the private sector where the wage gap was of the order of 44.4 per cent at that time.
The Committee notes that the Government's report contains no information in response to the Committee's previous request.
The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply information on: (i) the practical measures taken to apply section 52(c) of the Employment (Amendment) Ordinance 1989 in the public and private sectors of employment; (ii) the wage differential between men and women; (iii) the measures taken in cooperation with the employers' and workers' organizations to give effect to the Convention; and (iv) samples of collective agreements and public service job classifications and wage scales.
The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report.
1. The Committee requests the Government to provide in its next report information concerning the way in which the Equal Pay Ordinance 1975, as supplemented by the provisions of the Employment Ordinance (Part VA), applies in practice, indicating in particular: (i) the measures being taken or envisaged to verify and ensure that the principle of equal pay for work of equal value is being applied to remuneration actually paid above the legal minimum in all sectors of activity; (ii) the extent of the differential in the wage rates paid to women and men, together with information on any progress made towards reducing that differential in recent years; and (iii) the measures being taken or contemplated in cooperation with the employers' and workers' organisations to give effect to the provisions of the Convention.
2. The Committee also requests the Government to supply copies of collective agreements fixing rates of remuneration for occupations in which substantial numbers of women are employed and to furnish copies of wage scales and job classifications in force in the public sector.
With reference to its observation, the Committee requests the Government to supply information on the effect given in practice to Ordinance No. 23 of 10 August 1989, particularly as regards any complaints laid before an Industrial Tribunal in this connection. It also requests the Government to supply copies of any amendment or provide any information concerning the establishment of a procedure for the comparative evaluation of jobs.
The Committee notes with satisfaction the adoption of the Employment (Amendment) Ordinance No. 23 of 10 August 1989. The Committee notes that the purpose of this amendment is to give effect at the legislative level to the European Community Council Directives on the principle of equal treatment (the Directive of 9 February 1976) and of equal pay for men and women (the Directive of 10 February 1975).
Other points are raised in a request that is being addressed directly to the Government.