ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments > All Comments

DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish

CMNT_TITLE

Previous comment

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the two ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) in a single comment.
Articles 2(1), 3(1), 13, 16, 17 and 23 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 4, 6(1), 18, 21 22 and 23 of Convention No. 129. Labour inspection activities in the informal economy, including the registration of workers and the control of child labour. Following its previous comment on inspection in the informal economy, the Committee notes the Government’s information, according to which the State Labour Inspection Service (SLIS) exercises state supervision over compliance with labour law and regulations by all legal entities operating in the country and by individuals engaged in entrepreneurial activities, as provided for by Presidential Decree No. 386 of 16 February 2011 stipulating Regulations on the SLIS. The Committee also notes the Government’s reference to the electronic information system for registering employment contracts, which leads to strengthened monitoring of worker-employer relations, observance of workers’ labour rights and legalization of informal employment. In addition, according to the annual reports of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection (MLSP), four cases of employment of persons under 15 years were identified in 2021, compared to three cases in 2020. The Committee requests the Government to provide more detailed information on the activities carried out by the labour inspection services within the informal sector, including the violations identified and sanctions imposed. The Committee also requests the Government to provide detailed information on the activities carried out by the labour inspection services with regard to child labour and the results achieved.
Article 4 of Convention No. 81 and Article 7 of Convention No. 129. Organization and functioning of the labour inspection system under the supervision and control of a central authority. The Committee previously noted the Government’s indication that, in May 2012, a memorandum was signed setting out the conditions for cooperation between the SLIS and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) with regard to the organization of the SLIS. Noting that the Government has not provided any information in this regard, the Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on whether the memorandum of cooperation signed between the IFC and the SLIS is still in force, and to provide information on any legislative or practical measures carried out in this framework.
Articles 5(a) and 14 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 12 and 19 of Convention No. 129. Notification of cases of occupational diseases to the labour inspection services.Cooperation with other authorities. Following its previous comment, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that occupational diseases are investigated by the Ministry of Health. The Government reiterates that efforts are made to enable effective cooperation between the Ministry of Health and the MLSP. However, the Committee notes that the Government does not specify whether this cooperation includes the communication of data on occupational diseases from the Ministry of Health to the MLSP. Therefore, the Committee requests once again that the Government provide information on the legal and practical measures taken to determine the manner in which labour inspectors are notified of cases of occupational disease in accordance with Article 14 of Convention No. 81 and Article 19 of Convention No. 129. It also once again requests the Government to provide concrete information on the arrangements to promote collaboration with the Ministry of Health, particularly on the exchange of relevant data.
Article 6 of Convention No. 81 and Article 8 of Convention No. 129. Status and conditions of service of labour inspectors.Noting the absence of relevant information, the Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the status and conditions of service granted to labour inspectors to ensure their independence from any improper external influences. In this regard, it again requests the Government to provide information on the conditions of service of labour inspectors compared with those of public officials exercising similar functions, such as tax inspectors.
Articles 15(c) and 16 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 20(c) and 21 of Convention No. 129. Confidentiality of the source of any complaint. Following its previous comment, the Committee notes that, regarding the compliance of labour legislation, the 2021 annual report of the MLSP only refers to the examination of appeals received from various bodies. The Committee also notes that the Government’s once again refers to “a variety of measures” taken by the management of the SLIS to guarantee “absolute confidentiality with regard to the source of information”, without providing further details. The Committee therefore requests once again that the Government provide information on any measures taken to establish a legal basis for the principle of confidentiality of the source of any complaint made to the SLIS. It also once again requests the Government to provide information on the practical measures taken by the management of the SLIS to guarantee that the source of information is not revealed by inspectors during inspection visits following a complaint.
Articles 5(a), 20 and 21 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 12, 26 and 27 of Convention No. 129.Publication of the annual report on the work of the labour inspection services and transmission to the Office. Maintenance of a register of enterprises liable to inspection. Following its previous comment, the Committee notes the Government’s information, according to which, an electronic information system for registering employment contracts has been operational since 1 July 2014, which created a database containing details of workers and employers and strengthening the state oversight of the labour market. The Government also indicates that as of 1 June 2022, a total of 370 persons are employed by the SLIS, of which 182 are inspectors (177 in 2018). Regarding inspection activities in agriculture, the Government states that, from 1 July 2018 to 31 May 2022, the SLIS examined 988 complaints, with 188 offences identified. Moreover, 39 accidents were investigated in agriculture, with 12 fatalities and 37 workers injured. The Committee also takes note of the annual report of the MLSP published on its official website, which contains information on the number of workers, violations detected, amount of fines imposed and the number of industrial accidents. The Government also indicates that an annual report on the activities of the SLIS is prepared in a limited number of copies for official use, with main findings disseminated by the media. The Committee requests the Government to ensure that annual reports on the work of the labour inspection services are published and forwarded to the Office, as required by Article 20 of Convention No. 81 and Article 26 of Convention No. 129, and that they include, either as a separate report or as part of the general report, information on agriculture. It also requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the annual report include information on all the subjects covered by Article 21(a)–(g) of Convention No. 81 and Article 27(a)–(g) of Convention No. 129, including specifically the number of workplaces liable to inspection, the statistics of inspection visits and the statistics of occupational diseases.

Specific issues in relation to agriculture

Article 6(1)(b) of Convention No. 129. Preventive activities by the labour inspectorate in agriculture. Following its previous request, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that the SLIS organized awareness-raising activities at agricultural enterprises. Seminars, meetings and other activities are also carried out across the country by regional bodies of the SLIS on the occasion of the World Day for Safety and Health at Work. The Committee takes note of this information which addresses its previous request.
Article 9(3) of Convention No. 129. Training of labour inspectors concerning their functions in agriculture. The Committee notes the Government’s response to its previous comment that the SLIS consists of labour inspectors who are multidisciplinary specialists, and that their remit includes monitoring compliance with labour law in respect of agriculture workers. The Government also indicates that as part of the European Union twining project entitled “Support to the SLIS in Occupational Health and Safety Enhancement in the Republic of Azerbaijan”, training courses on labour inspection in agriculture were carried out by foreign experts in September 2012 for labour inspectors. Noting that the European Union twining project ended in 2013, the Committee requests that the Government provide more detailed and up-to-date information on the training activities relating to agriculture, specifically the content of training sessions, their frequency and duration, and the number of participants attending.
Article 13 of Convention No. 129. Collaboration between labour inspectors and employers and workers or their organizations. The Committee notes the reiterated indication of the Government according to which the Tripartite Council on occupational safety and health (OSH) at the MLSP, supported by the social partners, has facilitated more effective labour inspections in agriculture. The Committee therefore once again requests that the Government provide information on the mandate of the Tripartite OSH Council with regard to agriculture and, if applicable, a copy of any relevant legal text. It also once again requests the Government to provide information on the role of the SLIS in the OSH Council, the topics dealt with, and to specify how the work of the Council has facilitated more effective inspections in agriculture and improved the working and living conditions in agricultural undertakings. In addition, having previously noted the information on regular seminars and meetings with the social partners, the Committee once again requests that the Government provide detailed information in this regard.
[ The Government is asked to reply in full to the present comments in 2024.]

CMNT_TITLE

Previous comment

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the ratified labour inspection Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 and 129 together.
Articles 12 and 16 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 16 and 21 of Convention No. 129. Limitations and restrictions of labour inspections. Powers of labour inspectors. 1. Moratorium and restrictions on labour inspections. The Committee notes that, according to the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated October 20, 2015, No. 1410-IVQ “On Suspension of Inspections in the Field of Entrepreneurship”, inspection of business entities in the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan have been suspended until January 1, 2024. In accordance with the requirements of this Law, inspection of business entities by the Service have been suspended since 1 November 2015, except for control of safe operation of potentially dangerous facilities and mining. Recalling with deep concern that a moratorium placed on labour inspection is a serious violation of the Conventions and with reference to its 2019 general observation on the labour inspection Conventions, the Committee urges the Government to eliminate the temporary ban on inspections and to ensure that labour inspectors are able to undertake labour inspections as often and as thoroughly as is necessary to ensure the effective application of the legal provisions, in compliance with Article 16 of Convention No. 81 and Article 21 of Convention No. 129.
2. Other limitations on labour inspections. The Committee notes that Law No. 714-IVQ of 2 July 2013 regulating inspections of business and protecting the interests of business owners, contains various limitations on labour inspectors’ powers, including with regard to: (i) the frequency of inspections (section 10); (ii) the scope of unscheduled inspections (section 16); (iii) the ability of labour inspectors to undertake inspection visits without previous notice (section 17.3); (iv) the duration of inspections (section 18); and (v) the issues that can be examined in the course of inspections (section 19). The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that, in order to implement paragraph 1.3 of Presidential Decree No. 955 of 28 August 2013 concerning the application of Law No. 714-IVQ of 2 July 2013, a draft decision approving the criteria for identifying risk groups for monitoring of compliance with labour law was submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers for examination in April 2021. In light of the above, the Committee urges the Government to take the necessary measures to revise Law No. 714-IVQ, in order to ensure that labour inspectors: (i) are empowered to make visits to workplaces liable to inspection without previous notice, in conformity with Article 12(1)(a) of Convention No. 81 and Article 16(1)(a) of Convention No. 129; (ii) are empowered to carry out any examination, test or inquiry which they may consider necessary in order to satisfy themselves that the legal provisions are being strictly observed in conformity with Article 12(1)(c) of Convention No. 81 and Article 16(1)(c) of Convention No. 129; (iii) can choose not to notify the employer or his representative of their presence, if they consider that such notification may be prejudicial to the performance of their duties, in accordance with Article 12(2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 16(3) of Convention No. 129; and (iv) are empowered to inspect workplaces as often and as thoroughly as is necessary to ensure the effective application of the relevant legal provisions, in accordance with Article 16 of Convention No. 81 and Article 21 of Convention No. 129. The Committee further requests the Government to provide information on the development of criteria for identifying risk groups for the government monitoring of labour law compliance, and to provide a copy of the decision adopted.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
[ The Government is asked to reply in full to the present comments in 2024.]

CMNT_TITLE

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the two ratified governance Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Convention Nos 81 and 129 in a single comment.
Articles 2(1), 3(1), 13, 16, 17 and 23 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 4, 6(1), 18, 21 22 and 23 of Convention No. 129. Labour inspection activities in the informal economy, including the registration of workers and the control of child labour. The Committee notes from the information contained in the Report of the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Council at its 29th session in June 2015 (A/HRC/29/28/Add.1) (hereinafter the Report of the Working Group of the HRC) that approximately 67 per cent of the population work without formal labour contracts in the informal economy and therefore fall outside the protection of the Labour Code. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that from June 2012 to May 2015, 1,062 employment contracts were concluded with workers who had been hired without an employment contract. It also notes that an electronic information system for the registration of labour contracts was launched in July 2014 in order to facilitate the monitoring of compliance with workers’ rights.
In addition, the Committee recalls that it noted in its 2014 comment, in relation to Article 2(1) of the Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138), the need to strengthen the capacity of the labour inspectorate in relation to the control of child labour in the informal economy, particularly on cotton, tobacco and tea plantations. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the consideration given to bringing workers in the informal economy under the purview of the national labour legislation. It further requests the Government, where applicable, to provide detailed information on the activities carried out by the labour inspection services within the informal sector, including the formalization of labour, to ensure that workers’ rights are secured. The Committee also requests the Government to provide detailed information on the activities carried out by the labour inspection services with regard to child labour, in particular on cotton, tobacco and tea plantations.
Article 4 of Convention No. 81 and Article 7 of Convention No. 129. Organization and functioning of the labour inspection system under the supervision and control of a central authority. The Committee previously noted a reorganization of the labour inspection services, which brought together the State Labour Inspectorate Service (SLIS), the State Employment Service (SESS) and the State Social Security Service (SSS) under the auspices of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection (MLSP). It also previously noted the Government’s indication that, in May 2012, a memorandum was signed setting out the conditions for cooperation between the SLIS and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) with regard to the organization of the SLIS. Noting that the Government has not provided any information in this regard, the Committee once again requests the Government to provide a copy of any legal texts concerning the organization and regulation of the labour inspection services under the MLSP. It also reiterates its request to the Government to provide an organizational chart of the MLSP and indicate what effects the structural changes have had on the operation of the labour inspection system.
In addition, the Committee once again requests that the Government provide a copy of the memorandum of cooperation signed between the IFC and the SLIS, and to provide information on any legislative or practical measures carried out in this framework.
Articles 5(a) and 14 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 12 and 19 of Convention No. 129. Notification of cases of occupational diseases to the labour inspection services. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes once again that the Government has not provided any information on the measures taken or envisaged for the establishment of a mechanism for the notification to the labour inspection services of cases of occupational diseases. It also notes the Government’s reiterated indication, in its report under Convention No. 129, that statistics of occupational diseases are collected by the relevant services of the Ministry of Health.
While the Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report under these Conventions that efforts have been undertaken to enable the effective cooperation between the services of the Ministry of Health and the MLSP, the Committee also notes that the Government does not specify whether this cooperation includes the communication of data on occupational diseases from the Ministry of Health to the MLSP. The Committee further notes that the Report of the Working Group of the HRC recommends the improvement of the collection of data on occupational safety and health, including through enhanced collaboration between the MLSP and the State Statistical Committee. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the legal and practical measures taken to determine the cases and manner in which labour inspectors are notified of cases of occupational disease in accordance with Article 14 of Convention No. 81 and Article 19 of Convention No. 129. It also once again requests that the Government make appropriate arrangements to continue to promote collaboration with the Ministry of Health, particularly on the exchange of relevant data (Article 5(a) of Convention No. 81 and Article 12 of Convention No. 129).
Article 6 of Convention No. 81 and Article 8 of Convention No. 129. Status and conditions of service of labour inspectors. The Committee notes that the Report of the Working Group of the HRC recommends anti-corruption efforts focused on the integrity of officers involved in law enforcement at the district or municipal levels. In this context, the Committee recalls its considerations made in paragraph 214 of its General Survey on labour inspection in which it indicated that when inspectors do not receive remuneration commensurate with their responsibilities, they may find themselves treated with disrespect during the conduct of their duties, which detracts from their authority. Moreover, low standards of living can also expose inspection officials to the temptation of treating certain employers leniently in exchange for favours. The Committee requests that the Government provide information on the status and conditions of service granted to labour inspectors to ensure their independence from any improper external influences. In this regard, it requests that the Government provide information on the conditions of service of labour inspectors compared with those of public officials exercising similar functions, such as tax inspectors.
Articles 15(c) and 16 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 20(c) and 21 of Convention No. 129. Confidentiality of the source of any complaint. The Committee previously noted that it appeared that, during the period from June 2010 to May 2012, the great majority of labour inspections were undertaken as a result of a complaint. In this regard, the Committee emphasized that in order for employers not to be inclined to systematically associate a visit with the existence of a complaint, and to better guarantee confidentiality regarding any connection between a complaint and an inspection visit, it is important to ensure that a sufficient number of regular inspection visits are conducted, in relation to inspection visits following a complaint.
In this regard, the Committee notes that the Government merely repeats its previous indications that “a variety of measures” are taken by the management of the SLIS to guarantee “absolute confidentiality with regard to the source of information”, without providing further information. The Committee therefore once again requests that the Government provide information on any measures taken to establish a legal basis for the principle of confidentiality of the source of any complaint made to the SLIS. It also once again requests that the Government provide information on the practical measures taken by the management of the SLIS to guarantee that the source of information is not revealed by inspectors during inspection visits following a complaint.
Articles 5(a), 20 and 21 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 12, 26 and 27 of Convention No. 129. Publication of the annual report on the work of the labour inspection services (in agriculture) and transmission to the Office. Maintenance of a register of enterprises liable to inspection. The Committee notes that once again no annual report on the work of the labour inspection services has been received by the Office and that, while the Government indicates that a website has been created that contains annual inspection reports on the activities of the SLIS, the Committee has not been able to access the web address provided by the Government. Concerning agriculture, the Committee notes, however, the information provided by the Government on (i) the number of agricultural undertakings inspected, (ii) the complaints examined, (iii) the number of violations detected, (iv) the number of orders issued, (v) the amount of fines imposed, and (vi) the number of industrial accidents investigated. In this context, the Committee also welcomes the information provided by the Government in its report under Convention No. 129 that an electronic information system for the registration of labour contracts was launched in July 2014 in order to facilitate the monitoring of compliance with workers’ rights.
However, the Committee also notes from the information contained in the Report of the Working Group of the HRC that the “Law on Right to Obtain Information” passed in 2012, together with amendments to the “State Law on Registration of Legal Entities and the Law on Commercial Secrets” means that enterprises are exempt from the requirement to provide public information about their registration, ownership and structure. It further notes from the information in this report that several stakeholders from independent media and civil society indicated that it was difficult to properly identify certain businesses and their owners to monitor compliance with national and international law. In this regard, the Committee recalls its general observations of 2009 and 2010, in which it emphasized the usefulness of the establishment of a regularly updated register of enterprises to determine priorities for inspections and to facilitate the publication of an annual inspection report, which is as an essential basis for evaluating in practice the activities of the labour inspection services and, subsequently, determining the means necessary to improve their effectiveness.
The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure the drawing up of an updated register of workplaces liable to inspection. In this regard, it also requests that the Government provide information on the obligation of employers to register their economic activity. The Committee requests the Government to also provide further details on the experience gained in relation to the registration of labour contracts in the new electronic information system (registration requirements, practical measures taken, number of contracts registered, etc.).
Moreover, the Committee once again requests the Government to ensure that annual reports (which should include, either as a separate report or as part of the general report, information on agriculture) are published and forwarded to the Office, within the time limits set out in Article 20 of Convention No. 81 and Article 26 of Convention No. 129, and that they include information on all the subjects covered by Article 21(a)–(g) of Convention No. 81 and Article 27(a)–(g) of Convention No. 129. It requests the Government in any event to provide statistical information that is as detailed as possible on the activities of the labour inspection services (industrial, commercial and agricultural workplaces liable to inspection), number of inspections (unannounced, planned or in response to a complaint) undertaken therein, infringements detected and the legal provisions to which they relate (such as those relating to wages, working time, minimum age for admission to employment and OSH requirements), penalties applied, number of occupational accidents and diseases, and inspection activities concerning the enforcement of legal provisions relating to the protection of health and safety of workers (including in hot weather conditions), etc.

Specific issues in relation to agriculture

Article 6(1)(b) of Convention No. 129. Preventive activities by the labour inspectorate in agriculture. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government concerning the preventive activities of the labour inspectorate. However, it also notes that the Government has not replied to its request concerning the specific preventive activities carried out in relation to agriculture. The Committee therefore once again requests that the Government provide information on any preventive labour inspection actions and initiatives relating to agriculture.
Article 9(3) of Convention No. 129. Training of labour inspectors concerning their functions in agriculture. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that labour inspectors are multi-profile specialists covering all sectors, including agriculture. It also notes the Government´s indication that training in the context of a project financed by the European Union also included training on issues arising in agriculture.
It notes however that the Government has not provided any details in relation to the training activities relating to agriculture (such as, for instance, the monitoring of machinery, the risks involved when dealing with pesticides and chemical substances, etc.). The Committee therefore once again requests that the Government supply more detailed information on the training activities relating to agriculture (that is content, frequency, duration, number of participants, etc.).
Article 13 of Convention No. 129. Collaboration between labour inspectors and employers and workers or their organizations. The Committee notes the reiterated indication of the Government according to which the Tripartite Council on occupational safety and health (OSH) at the MLSP, supported by the social partners, has facilitated more effective labour inspections in agriculture. The Committee therefore once again requests that the Government provide information on the mandate of the Tripartite OSH Council with regard to agriculture and, if applicable, a copy of any relevant legal text. It also once again requests that the Government provide information on the role of the SLIS in the OSH Council, the topics dealt with, and specify how the work of the Council has facilitated more effective inspections in agriculture and improved the working and living conditions in agricultural undertakings. In addition, having previously noted the information on regular seminars and meetings with the social partners, the Committee once again requests that the Government provide detailed information in this regard.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee refers to its comments on the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), in so far as they are concerned with the application of the present Convention.
Article 6(1)(a) and (b) of the Convention. Preventive activities by the labour inspectorate in agriculture. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government according to which the State Labour Inspectorate (SLI) organized various educational activities, seminars and meetings and held presentations on the occasion of the World Day for Safety and Health at Work, which were widely covered in the media, including by several television channels. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide more detailed information on any labour inspection actions and initiatives carried out in agriculture, particularly those intended to ensure the protection of workers exposed to hazards connected with the use of chemical products or complex plant or machinery, as well as on their impact on the level of compliance with the legislation and the number of occupational accidents and diseases in the agricultural sector.
Article 9(3). Training of labour inspectors in agriculture. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that training activities for labour inspectors in agriculture will be held in the context of a project financed by the European Union. It notes however that the Government has again not provided the requested information in relation to the initial training of labour inspectors in agriculture, nor has it reported on any other training activities in areas particularly relevant to agriculture (such as, for instance, the monitoring of machinery, the identification of specific occupational risks and the means to reduce or eliminate them) during the reporting period. The Committee therefore once again asks the Government to supply details on the content of the initial training provided to labour inspectors in agriculture, as well as detailed information on any other training activities in areas relevant to agriculture in their course of employment (content, frequency, duration, number of participants, etc.).
Article 13. Collaboration between labour inspectors and employers and workers or their organizations. The Committee notes the Government’s indication according to which the establishment and operation of a tripartite council on occupational safety and health (OSH) conditions with representatives of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection, the Confederation of Trade Unions of Azerbaijan and the National Confederation of Entrepreneurs in January 2012 has facilitated more effective labour inspections in agriculture. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the mandate of the tripartite OSH council with regard to agriculture and, if applicable, a copy of any relevant legal text. Please provide information on the role of the SLI in the council, the topics dealt with, and specify how the work of the council has facilitated more effective inspections in agriculture and improved the working and living conditions in agricultural undertakings. Having previously noted the information on regular seminars and meetings with the social partners, the Committee once again requests the Government to provide detailed information in this regard.
Articles 12, 19, 21, 26 and 27. Publication and content of the annual report on the work of the labour inspection services in agriculture. The Committee notes that the annual report on the work of the labour inspection services has not been received by the Office. It notes however the information provided by the Government on the number of agricultural undertakings inspected, complaints examined, violations reported, number of orders issued, amount of fines imposed, other enforcement measures taken, and the number of industrial accidents investigated. With reference to its direct request under Convention No. 81, and the publication of annual reports on the work of the labour inspection services (which should include, either as a separate report or as part of the general report information on agriculture), the Committee hopes that the Government will soon be in a position to give effect to its relevant obligations under Article 26(1) and (2). It further requests the Government to ensure that annual reports are forwarded to the Office, within the time limits set out in Article 26(3) of the Convention, and that they include information on all the subjects covered by Article 27(a) to (g).
The Committee would be grateful if the Government would also supply any information available, as previously requested, on the type and size of the agricultural undertakings inspected, the number of workers covered by the inspection visits (unannounced, planned or in response to a complaint) and the legal provisions in respect of which violations have been reported (such as those relating to wages, working time, minimum age for admission to employment and OSH requirements).
With reference to its direct request under Convention No. 81, and the need to take the necessary legal and practical measures to determine the cases and manner in which labour inspectors shall be notified of cases of occupational diseases, the Committee once again asks the Government to make appropriate arrangements to continue to promote collaboration with the Ministry of Health, particularly in the exchange of relevant data, so that the SLI is in a position, in accordance with Article 27(g), to include data on cases of occupational disease, including their causes, in future annual reports.
Labour inspection and child labour in agriculture. The Committee notes that the Government has not provided information on the work of the labour inspection activities with regard to children engaged in agricultural work. The Committee therefore once again requests the Government, with reference to its direct request under the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182), in which it emphasized the widespread use of child labour in the cotton, tobacco and tea growing sectors, to supply information on any actions taken by labour inspectors to identify the children engaged in agricultural work and to combat the phenomenon, particularly on cotton, tobacco and tea plantations. In this respect, the Committee once again refers the Government to the guidance provided in its 1999 general observation under both this Convention and Convention No. 81.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that the Government’s report of 23 August 2010 is identical to its previous report. With reference to its direct request under Convention No. 81 in so far as it also relates to labour inspection activities in agriculture, the Committee is bound to repeat its previous direct request which read as follows:

Article 9, paragraph 3, of the Convention. Training of labour inspectors in agriculture. The Committee notes that the Government has not replied to its request concerning the areas covered by the ten-day course at the Research and Training Centre of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection with regard to labour inspectors in agriculture. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply details on the content of this course devoted to the initial training of labour inspectors in agriculture and the purpose and organization of any other kind of training measures aimed at enabling them to deal with specific issues in agricultural undertakings.

Article 13. Collaboration between labour inspectors and employers and workers or their organizations. The Committee notes the indication by the Government that the state labour inspection authority periodically holds, jointly with the social partners, seminars and meetings on labour inspection in the agricultural sector. It notes with interest that, according to the annual report, such seminars and meetings were held at the regional level and that the Occupational Safety and Health Day provided an opportunity to organize a seminar. The Committee requests the Government to supply detailed information on the content of such collaboration and on its impact on the observance of the legal provisions covered by this Convention.

Articles 5, paragraph 1(a) and (c), 26 and 27. Coverage, publication and content of the annual report on the work of the labour inspection services in agriculture. With reference to the Government’s previous report, the Committee notes the reiterated information that, under the agrarian reforms, all land suitable for farming was distributed equally among the rural population and transferred private ownership. According to the Government, most families use the land given to them in the form of individual farms and officials of the state labour inspectorate visit the new farms, inform them of the requirements laid down in labour legislation and provide them with practical support in the organization of work. The Committee notes with interest the important role that labour inspection has been able to play in the improvement of the labour legislation to resolve problems arising out of the new labour relations in agriculture (section 3.8 of Cabinet Order No. 3 of 9 January 2003 concerning the compensation payable to workers in cases of occupational injury at former state agricultural enterprises, or to their families in cases of fatal occupational injury).

According to the Government, 1,733 agricultural undertakings are operational in the country and the statistics provided by the annual inspection report indicate that 156 of them were inspected by labour inspectors in 2007. The Committee notes, among other information provided in the report, the number of complaints, violations, sanctions and other enforcement measures, industrial accidents and relevant investigations. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply any information available on the type and size of the agricultural undertakings inspected, the number of workers covered by the inspection visits and the type of visits (unannounced, planned or in response to a complaint). The Committee would be grateful if the Government would also supply information on the legal provisions in respect of which violations have been reported, such as those relating to wages, working time, minimum age for admission to employment and occupational safety and health requirements.

With reference to its direct request under Convention No. 81, and in view of the specific occupational hazards to which agricultural workers are exposed, such as the use of chemicals or complex machines, the Committee further requests the Government to make appropriate arrangements to promote collaboration with the Ministry of Health so that the central labour inspection authority is in a position, in accordance with Article 27(g), to include data on cases of occupational disease, including their causes, in future annual reports. It also requests the Government to ensure that the total number of agricultural undertakings liable to inspection and the number of workers employed therein are included in annual reports, in accordance with Article 27(c).

The Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which effect is given to the obligation to publish such reports, as prescribed by Article 26(1) and (2).

Labour inspection and child labour in agriculture. With reference to its direct request under the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182), in which it emphasizes the widespread use of child labour in the cotton, tobacco and tea growing sectors, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply information on any actions taken by labour inspectors to identify the children engaged in agricultural work and to combat the phenomenon, particularly on cotton, tobacco and tea plantations. In this respect, the Committee suggests that the Government might also refer to the guidance provided in its 1999 general observation under both this Convention and Convention No. 81.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes the additional information supplied by the Government in response to some of its previous comments concerning the legal provisions on the conditions of work and the protection of agricultural workers, the number of labour inspectors in agriculture (38) and the reimbursement of mission expenses. It also notes the information contained in the 2007 annual report on the work of the labour inspection services in agriculture.

Article 9, paragraph 3, of the Convention. Training of labour inspectors in agriculture. The Committee notes that the Government has not replied to its request concerning the areas covered by the ten-day course at the Research and Training Centre of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection with regard to labour inspectors in agriculture. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply details on the content of this course devoted to the initial training of labour inspectors in agriculture and the purpose and organization of any other kind of training measures aimed at enabling them to deal with specific issues in agricultural undertakings.

Article 13. Collaboration between labour inspectors and employers and workers or their organizations. The Committee notes the indication by the Government that the state labour inspection authority periodically holds, jointly with the social partners, seminars and meetings on labour inspection in the agricultural sector. It notes with interest that, according to the annual report, such seminars and meetings were held at the regional level and that the Occupational Safety and Health Day provided an opportunity to organize a seminar. The Committee requests the Government to supply detailed information on the content of such collaboration and on its impact on the observance of the legal provisions covered by this Convention.

Articles 5, paragraph 1(a) and (c), 26 and 27. Coverage, publication and content of the annual report on the work of the labour inspection services in agriculture. With reference to the Government’s previous report, the Committee notes the reiterated information that, under the agrarian reforms, all land suitable for farming was distributed equally among the rural population and transferred private ownership. According to the Government, most families use the land given to them in the form of individual farms and officials of the state labour inspectorate visit the new farms, inform them of the requirements laid down in labour legislation and provide them with practical support in the organization of work. The Committee notes with interest the important role that labour inspection has been able to play in the improvement of the labour legislation to resolve problems arising out of the new labour relations in agriculture (section 3.8 of Cabinet Order No. 3 of 9 January 2003 concerning the compensation payable to workers in cases of occupational injury at former state agricultural enterprises, or to their families in cases of fatal occupational injury).

According to the Government, 1,733 agricultural undertakings are operational in the country and the statistics provided by the annual inspection report indicate that 156 of them were inspected by labour inspectors in 2007. The Committee notes, among other information provided in the report, the number of complaints, violations, sanctions and other enforcement measures, industrial accidents and relevant investigations. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply any information available on the type and size of the agricultural undertakings inspected, the number of workers covered by the inspection visits and the type of visits (unannounced, planned or in response to a complaint). The Committee would be grateful if the Government would also supply information on the legal provisions in respect of which violations have been reported, such as those relating to wages, working time, minimum age for admission to employment and occupational safety and health requirements.

With reference to its direct request under Convention No. 81, and in view of the specific occupational hazards to which agricultural workers are exposed, such as the use of chemicals or complex machines, the Committee further requests the Government to make appropriate arrangements to promote collaboration with the Ministry of Health so that the central labour inspection authority is in a position, in accordance with Article 27(g), to include data on cases of occupational disease, including their causes, in future annual reports. It also requests the Government to ensure that the total number of agricultural undertakings liable to inspection and the number of workers employed therein are included in annual reports, in accordance with Article 27(c).

The Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which effect is given to the obligation to publish such reports, as prescribed by Article 26(1) and (2).

Labour inspection and child labour in agriculture. With reference to its direct request under the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182), in which it emphasizes the widespread use of child labour in the cotton, tobacco and tea growing sectors, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply information on any actions taken by labour inspectors to identify the children engaged in agricultural work and to combat the phenomenon, particularly on cotton, tobacco and tea plantations. In this respect, the Committee suggests that the Government might also refer to the guidance provided in its 1999 general observation under both this Convention and Convention No. 81.

CMNT_TITLE

1. Part I of the report form and Article 6, paragraph 1(a), of the Convention. While noting that texts relating to the organization and operation of the labour inspection system in general are available at the ILO, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would supplement this information by indicating the legal provisions on the conditions of work and the protection of agricultural workers which are relevant to the work of labour inspectors and describe the content thereof.

2. Article 9, paragraph 3. Further in-service training or labour inspectors in agriculture. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide information on the content of the ten-day training course given to inspectors immediately after they have been recruited and to indicate whether, as required by this Article of the Convention, measures other than that of working under the guidance of an experienced inspector for one year are taken to ensure that they receive appropriate further in-service training in their employment.

3. Article 14. Number and geographical distribution of inspectors in agriculture. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate the number and geographical distribution of inspectors in service who have received initial training with a view to carrying out their duties in the agricultural sector and to provide any other details of the criteria taken into consideration when determining this distribution.

4. Article 15, paragraphs 1(b) and 2, and Article 21. Frequency of inspections of agricultural undertakings. The Committee asks the Government to communicate information of a practical nature on the transport facilities available to inspectors for carrying out inspections of agricultural undertakings and on the distribution of inspections, whether planned or carried out in response to a complaint or information received.

5. Articles 26 and 27. Annual report on the work of the inspection services. The Committee notes that under section 8.10 of Order No. 20 of 2000 approving the regulations on the State Labour Inspectorate in the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection, an annual report on matters relating to the inspectorate’s activities shall be published in the media. In its first report, the Government stated that a summary of the annual report was published in the newspaper Novaya Zhizn (“New Life”) and that the statistics required under Article 27 of the Convention were included in that report. The Committee notes, however, that such a report has not yet been sent to the ILO and therefore asks the Government to take the necessary steps to ensure that this is done, so that it can assess the practical aspects of the work of the labour inspection services in agriculture in relation to the requirements of the Convention.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with interest the Government’s first report. In order to assess more accurately the effect given to the different provisions of the Convention, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide in its next report, alongside the information, texts and documents required for the application of Convention No. 81, further information on the following points.

Duties of the labour inspection system in agriculture. Please indicate whether, alongside the enforcement and advisory functions provided for in Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention, national laws or regulations entrust labour inspectors in agriculture with advisory or enforcement functions concerning legal provisions relating to conditions of life of workers and their families, pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 2.

Training for labour inspectors in agriculture. Please describe the measures taken to ensure that labour inspectors in agriculture are adequately trained for the performance of their duties (Article 9, paragraph 3).

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer