National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Previous comment
Repetition Article 2(1) of the Convention. Insertion of labour clauses. The Committee notes the adoption of the Public Procurement Act, 2004, and of the Public Procurement (Goods, Works, Non-Consultant Services and Disposal of Public Assets by Tender) Regulations, 2005. It notes, in particular, that the only provision in these texts which appears to address labour matters with relation to the public procurement process is to be found in section 14(1)(d) of the Regulations which provides that, as a prequalification criterion, suppliers, contractors and service providers must have fulfilled their obligations to pay taxes and social security contributions and they must abide to employment, environmental, health and safety requirements in the United Republic of Tanzania, where required. The Committee refers, in this respect, to paragraphs 117–118 of the General Survey of 2008 on labour clauses in which it pointed out that the Convention does not relate to some general eligibility criteria of individuals or enterprises bidding for public contracts but requires a labour clause to be expressly included in the actual contract that is finally signed by the procuring entity and the selected contractor. Similarly, certification may offer some proof about tenderers’ past performance and law-abiding conduct but carries no binding commitment with regard to prospective operations as labour clauses do. Noting therefore that the new public procurement legislation appears to contain no provision implementing the requirements of the Convention, the Committee requests the Government to specify how it is giving effect to the Convention in law and practice and to transmit copies of any relevant texts which may not have been communicated previously.In addition, the Committee notes that, under section 7(1)(d) of the Public Procurement Act, the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority is responsible for preparing and issuing authorized versions of standard tendering documents. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate whether any standard bidding documents containing labour clauses have so far been issued and are currently in use and, if so, to transmit copies. Moreover, the Committee recalls that in an earlier report the Government had referred to the Conditions of Contract for Works of Civil Engineering Construction prepared by the International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC) as being systematically applied to all public contracts. In this respect, the Committee wishes to refer to paragraph 268 of the abovementioned General Survey in which it noted that the FIDIC general clause on rates of wages and conditions of labour does not fully meet the international standard set in the Convention since it does not refer to local wages and conditions of labour being established by collective agreement, arbitration award or national laws or regulations, it does not fully capture the idea that it is the most advantageous level of wages and working conditions established locally that is required under the contract, and it does not establish clearly that it applies also to subcontractors. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to provide additional explanations in this regard.Part V of the report form. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would communicate together with its next report up to date information on the application of the Convention in practice, including for instance the average number of public contracts granted annually and the approximate number of workers engaged in their execution, labour inspection results concerning contract performance, copies of official documents such as reports or surveys undertaken by the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority on procurement matters, etc.
Article 2(1) of the Convention. Insertion of labour clauses. The Committee notes the adoption of the Public Procurement Act, 2004, and of the Public Procurement (Goods, Works, Non-Consultant Services and Disposal of Public Assets by Tender) Regulations, 2005. It notes, in particular, that the only provision in these texts which appears to address labour matters with relation to the public procurement process is to be found in section 14(1)(d) of the Regulations which provides that, as a prequalification criterion, suppliers, contractors and service providers must have fulfilled their obligations to pay taxes and social security contributions and they must abide to employment, environmental, health and safety requirements in the United Republic of Tanzania, where required. The Committee refers, in this respect, to paragraphs 117–118 of the General Survey of 2008 on labour clauses in which it pointed out that the Convention does not relate to some general eligibility criteria of individuals or enterprises bidding for public contracts but requires a labour clause to be expressly included in the actual contract that is finally signed by the procuring entity and the selected contractor. Similarly, certification may offer some proof about tenderers’ past performance and law-abiding conduct but carries no binding commitment with regard to prospective operations as labour clauses do. Noting therefore that the new public procurement legislation appears to contain no provision implementing the requirements of the Convention, the Committee requests the Government to specify how it is giving effect to the Convention in law and practice and to transmit copies of any relevant texts which may not have been communicated previously.
In addition, the Committee notes that, under section 7(1)(d) of the Public Procurement Act, the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority is responsible for preparing and issuing authorized versions of standard tendering documents. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate whether any standard bidding documents containing labour clauses have so far been issued and are currently in use and, if so, to transmit copies. Moreover, the Committee recalls that in an earlier report the Government had referred to the Conditions of Contract for Works of Civil Engineering Construction prepared by the International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC) as being systematically applied to all public contracts. In this respect, the Committee wishes to refer to paragraph 268 of the abovementioned General Survey in which it noted that the FIDIC general clause on rates of wages and conditions of labour does not fully meet the international standard set in the Convention since it does not refer to local wages and conditions of labour being established by collective agreement, arbitration award or national laws or regulations, it does not fully capture the idea that it is the most advantageous level of wages and working conditions established locally that is required under the contract, and it does not establish clearly that it applies also to subcontractors. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to provide additional explanations in this regard.
Part V of the report form. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would communicate together with its next report up to date information on the application of the Convention in practice, including for instance the average number of public contracts granted annually and the approximate number of workers engaged in their execution, labour inspection results concerning contract performance, copies of official documents such as reports or surveys undertaken by the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority on procurement matters, etc.
For all useful purposes, the Committee attaches herewith a copy of a Practical Guide, prepared by the Office principally on the basis of the General Survey of 2008 on Convention No. 94, to help better understand the requirements of the Convention and ultimately improve its application in law.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
The Committee notes that the information provided by the Government bears no relevance to the procedure of public procurement but seems to refer to the employment and wage conditions of public servants in accordance with the Security of Employment Act (Civil Servants) No. 1 of 1988. The Committee recalls that the Convention requires the insertion of labour clauses in all public contracts falling within its scope, their advertisement, and appropriate sanctions in case of non-observance. It therefore requests the Government to indicate the legal or administrative texts giving effect to the specific requirements of the Convention.
Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes that the Conditions of Contract for Works of Civil Engineering Construction established by the “Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs Conseils” (FIDIC) do not contain any labour clause ensuring to the workers engaged by the contractor conditions of labour including wages which are not less favourable than those established for work of the same character in the same district, as required under this provision of the Convention. The Committee further notes the Government’s reference to the Regulation of Wages and Terms of Employment Order as the basis for the clauses to be included in contracts. It points out that this Order sets the minimum level of wage and terms of employment. This is not sufficient to give effect to the provision of Article 2 of the Convention. The minimum standards fixed by the Order may well be improved upon by means of collective bargaining or otherwise. In addition, the provision of penalties as required under Article 5 on which the Government has supplied no information, makes it possible to impose sanctions in case of violations of labour clauses in the public contracts which may be more directly effective than those applicable under general labour legislation.
The Committee recalls that previously the Government referred, for instance in its report submitted in 1972, to the Public Works Division Contract Agreement Forms R.163A, R.164A and R.167A (1968 edition), which included clauses dealing with conditions of employment in conformity with Article 2 of the Convention. It asks the Government to state if any equivalent forms are currently in use and, if so, to supply a copy. If this is not the case, the Committee requests the Government to indicate any measures taken or contemplated to ensure the insertion of labour clauses, as required under Article 2, in all public contracts covered by the Convention.
Finally, the Committee seizes this opportunity to refer to this year’s General Survey which contains an overview of public procurement practices and procedures in so far as labour conditions are concerned and makes a global assessment of the impact and present-day relevance of Convention No. 94.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
The Committee notes the Government’s report concerning the application of the Convention in Zanzibar. However, the information provided by the Government bears no relevance to the procedure of public procurement but seems to refer to the employment and wage conditions of public servants in accordance with the Security of Employment Act (Civil Servants) No. 1 of 1988. The Committee recalls that the Convention requires the insertion of labour clauses in all public contracts falling within its scope, their advertisement, and appropriate sanctions in case of non-observance. It therefore requests the Government to indicate the legal or administrative texts giving effect to the specific requirements of the Convention.
Moreover, the Committee notes that the Government’s report does not reply to the matters raised in its previous direct request. It therefore asks the Government to supply in its next report full information on the following points.
Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes that the Conditions of Contract for Works of Civil Engineering Construction established by the "Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs Conseils" (FIDIC) do not contain any labour clause ensuring to the workers engaged by the contractor conditions of labour including wages which are not less favourable than those established for work of the same character in the same district, as required under this provision of the Convention. The Committee further notes the Government’s reference to the Regulation of Wages and Terms of Employment Order as the basis for the clauses to be included in contracts. It points out that this Order sets the minimum level of wage and terms of employment. This is not sufficient to give effect to the provision of Article 2 of the Convention. The minimum standards fixed by the Order may well be improved upon by means of collective bargaining or otherwise. In addition, the provision of penalties as required under Article 5 on which the Government has supplied no information, makes it possible to impose sanctions in case of violations of labour clauses in the public contracts which may be more directly effective than those applicable under general labour legislation.
[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2006.]
Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes that the above Conditions of Contract established by the FIDIC does not contain any labour clause ensuring to the workers engaged by the contractor conditions of labour including wages which are not less favourable than those established for work of the same character in the district, as required under this provision of the Convention. The Committee further notes the Government’s reference to the Regulation of Wages and Terms of Employment Order as the basis for the clauses to be included in contracts. It points out that, as the Government subsequently notes itself, this Order sets the minimum level of wage and terms of employment. This is not sufficient to give effect to the provision of Article 2 of the Convention. The minimum standards fixed by the Order may well be improved upon by means of collective bargaining or otherwise. In addition, the provision of penalties as required under Article 5 on which the Government has supplied no information, makes it possible to impose sanctions in case of violations of labour clauses in the public contracts which may be more directly effective than those applicable under general labour legislation.
The Committee recalls that previously the Government referred, for instance in its report submitted in 1972, to the Public Works Division Contract Agreement Forms R.163A, R.164A and 167A (1968 edition), which included clauses dealing with conditions of employment of labour in conformity with Article 2 of the Convention. It asks the Government to state if any equivalent forms are in use, and if so to supply a copy. If it is not the case, the Committee requests the Government to indicate any measures taken or contemplated to ensure the insertion of labour clauses as required under Article 2 in all public contracts covered by the Convention in terms of Article 1.
Application of the Convention in Zanzibar. Further to its previous direct request, the Committee requests the Government to supply information concerning the application of the Convention in Zanzibar.
[The Government is asked to report in detail in 2005.]
Further to its previous direct request, the Committee requests the Government to supply information concerning the application of the Convention in Zanzibar.
Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes that the above Conditions of Contract established by the FIDIC does not contain any labour clause ensuring to the workers engaged by the contractor conditions of labour including wages which are not less favourable than those established for work of the same character in the district, as required under this provision of the Convention. The Committee further notes the Government’s reference to the Regulation of Wages and Terms of Employment Order as the basis for the clauses to be included in contracts. It points out that, as the Government subsequently notes itself, this Order sets the minimum level of wage and terms of employment. This is not sufficient to give effect to the provision of Article 2 of the Convention. The minimum standards fixed by the Order may well be improved upon by means of collective bargaining or otherwise. In addition, the provision of penalties as required under Article 5 on which the Government has supplied no information, makes it possible to impose sanctions in case of violations of labour clauses in the public contracts which may be more directly effective than those applicable under general labour legislation. The Committee recalls that previously the Government referred, for instance in its report submitted in 1972, to the Public Works Division Contract Agreement Forms R.163A, R.164A and 167A (1968 edition), which included clauses dealing with conditions of employment of labour in conformity with Article 2 of the Convention. It asks the Government to state if any equivalent forms are in use, and if so to supply a copy. If it is not the case, the Committee requests the Government to indicate any measures taken or contemplated to ensure the insertion of labour clauses as required under Article 2 in all public contracts covered by the Convention in terms of Article 1.
The Committee notes the Government’s report and the attached text of the Conditions of Contract for Works of Civil Engineering Construction [Part I. General Conditions], 4th edition, 1987, established by the "Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs Conseils (FIDIC)". Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes that the above Conditions of Contract established by the FIDIC does not contain any labour clause ensuring to the workers engaged by the contractor conditions of labour including wages which are not less favourable than those established for work of the same character in the district, as required under this provision of the Convention. The Committee further notes the Government’s reference to the Regulation of Wages and Terms of Employment Order as the basis for the clauses to be included in contracts. It points out that, as the Government subsequently notes itself, this Order sets the minimum level of wage and terms of employment. This is not sufficient to give effect to the provision of Article 2 of the Convention. The minimum standards fixed by the Order may well be improved upon by means of collective bargaining or otherwise. In addition, the provision of penalties as required under Article 5 on which the Government has supplied no information, makes it possible to impose sanctions in case of violations of labour clauses in the public contracts which may be more directly effective than those applicable under general labour legislation. The Committee recalls that previously the Government referred, for instance in its report submitted in 1972, to the Public Works Division Contract Agreement Forms R.163A, R.164A and 167A (1968 edition), which included clauses dealing with conditions of employment of labour in conformity with Article 2 of the Convention. It asks the Government to state if any equivalent forms are in use, and if so to supply a copy. If it is not the case, the Committee requests the Government to indicate any measures taken or contemplated to ensure the insertion of labour clauses as required under Article 2 in all public contracts covered by the Convention in terms of Article 1. Application of the Convention in Zanzibar Further to its previous direct request, the Committee requests the Government to supply information concerning the application of the Convention in Zanzibar.
The Committee notes the Government’s report and the attached text of the Conditions of Contract for Works of Civil Engineering Construction [Part I. General Conditions], 4th edition, 1987, established by the "Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs Conseils (FIDIC)".
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which reads as follows:
The Committee notes the Government's report and the attached text of the Conditions of Contract for Works of Civil Engineering Construction (Part I. General Conditions), 4th edition, 1987, established by the "Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs Conseils (FIDIC)".
Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes that the above Conditions of Contract established by the FIDIC does not contain any labour clause ensuring to the workers engaged by the contractor conditions of labour including wages which are not less favourable than those established for work of the same character in the district, as required under this provision of the Convention. The Committee further notes the Government's reference to the Regulation of Wages and Terms of Employment Order as the basis for the clauses to be included in contracts. It points out that, as the Government subsequently notes itself, this Order sets the minimum level of wage and terms of employment. This is not sufficient to give effect to the provision of Article 2 of the Convention. The minimum standards fixed by the Order may well be improved upon by means of collective bargaining or otherwise. In addition, the provision of penalties as required under Article 5 on which the Government has supplied no information, makes it possible to impose sanctions in case of violations of labour clauses in the public contracts which may be more directly effective than those applicable under general labour legislation.
Application of the Convention in Zanzibar
The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:
The Committee noted that for a number of years the Government's reports had indicated no change in the application of this Convention. However, the Committee recalls that the last detailed report on the application of the Convention was dated 1972 and that this report essentially covered the Mainland (Tanganyika).
The Committee requests the Government to supply information concerning the application of the Convention in Zanzibar, including, for instance, whether the regulations and directives referred to in the above reports also apply to Zanzibar, and to supply copies of contracts awarded by the Government which are covered by this Convention.
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:
The Committee notes that for a number of years the Government's reports have indicated no change in the application of this Convention. However, the Committee recalls that the last detailed report on the application of the Convention was dated 1972 and that this report essentially covered the Mainland (Tanganyika).