National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Effective tripartite consultations. The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s report received in September 2009 in reply to its previous observation which commended the approach of the Government and the social partners in providing that effective tripartite consultation be held on measures taken to promote the implementation and ratification, as appropriate, of Conventions and Recommendations. The Committee notes with interest that after detailed studies and having received a letter of clarification from the Office, the Icelandic ILO Committee advised the Government to ratify the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), and the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129). Iceland’s ratification of Conventions Nos 81 and 129 were registered in March 2009. Furthermore, the Government indicates that the main conclusion of a September 2007 report concerning termination of employment was that it was not possible to draft guidelines unless it was based on more detailed political policy-making. This issue has not been further discussed within the Icelandic ILO Committee as the main organizations of employers and workers reached an agreement, as part of their collective agreement signed 17 February 2008, on procedures concerning dismissals. The Committee notes that in October 2008, the Icelandic ILO Committee arranged a meeting with all the major stakeholders which could be affected by Iceland’s possible ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, and the Work in Fishing Convention, 2007 (No. 188). Some obstacles were detected concerning possible ratification of these two instruments and the question of ratification is currently studied jointly by the Icelandic ILO Committee, the Ministry of Communication, which is responsible for maritime questions, and the Icelandic Maritime Administration. The Government lastly indicates in its report that the Icelandic ILO Committee has studied the possible ratification of the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187), and requested the opinion of the Administration on this issue. The main conclusion is that Icelandic legislation does not meet the requirements of the Convention in respect of collecting data on occupational accidents and diseases. However, possibilities for remedying this situation are being studied. The Committee invites the Government to continue to report on measures taken to promote tripartite consultations on international labour standards, as required under Convention No. 144.
1. Article 5, paragraph 1(b), of the Convention. Tripartite consultations required by the Convention. Submission to Parliament. The Committee notes the indications provided by the Government in relation to the matters raised in its 2006 observation on the obligation to submit the instruments adopted by the Conference to Parliament. It notes with interest that the Government has decided that a submission to Parliament will be preceded by effective consultations on the proposed instruments.
2. Article 5, paragraph 1(c). Consultations on unratified Conventions and Recommendations. The Committee further notes the detailed information on the tripartite consultations held on the prospect of ratification of the labour inspection Conventions (Conventions Nos 81 and 129) and the Termination of Employment Convention, 1982 (No. 158). With regard to the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), the Icelandic ILO Committee is examining the reply given by the Office in March 2007 in response to a request for clarification. With regard to Convention No. 158, the Ministry for Social Affairs requested the Institute for Gender Equality and Labour Law of the Bifrost University to draft guidelines concerning the termination of employment in light of the spirit of Convention No. 158. The draft will be put on the agenda of the Icelandic ILO Committee for discussion. The Committee notes with interest the information provided and commends the approach of the Government and the social partners in providing that effective tripartite consultation be held on the measures that might be taken to promote the implementation and ratification, as appropriate, of Conventions and Recommendations.
1. Tripartite consultations required by the Convention. The Committee refers to its 2006 observation on the obligation to submit to the competent authorities the instruments adopted by the Conference. It recalls that, since becoming a Member of the ILO in 1946, Iceland has ratified 22 Conventions and that 20 Conventions are still in force, including the eight fundamental Conventions.
2. The Committee notes that, for those States which have ratified Convention No. 144, effective tripartite consultations have to be held on the proposals to be made to the competent authorities when submitting the instruments adopted by the Conference (Article 5, paragraph 1(b), of the Convention). The Committee has pointed out, in particular in its 2000 General Survey on tripartite consultation, that the obligation to hold consultations must be fulfilled before the proposed measures are decided upon if the procedure is not to be a mere formality. As for the results of the consultations, although they are not binding on the Government, the latter is nonetheless obliged to ensure that tripartite consultations are effective, in accordance with Article 2, paragraph 1, of the Convention. For the Committee, “effective consultations” mean consultations which enable employers’ and workers’ organizations to have a useful say in matters relating to the activities of the ILO referred to in Article 5, paragraph 1. In this respect, the Committee trusts that the Government and the social partners will examine the measures to be taken to hold “effective consultations” on the proposals made to Parliament when submitting the instruments adopted by the Conference (Article 5, paragraph 1(b), of the Convention). The Committee would be grateful if the Government would also provide particulars in its next report on the consultations held on the re-examination of unratified Conventions and of Recommendations to which effect has not yet been given, so that it can consider what measures might be taken to promote their implementation and ratification, as appropriate (Article 5, paragraph 1(c), of the Convention).