National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Repetition Legislation. The Committee notes that the Government has supplied a long list of items of legislation adopted during the reporting period. In order to have a better understanding of the impact of these changes on the application of the Convention, the Committee needs precise and up-to-date information on the manner in which the new legislation gives effect to the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to communicate a detailed report indicating the legislative, regulatory and other provisions, and their relevant sections, which give effect to each of the Articles of the Convention. It also requests the Government to provide answers to the following questions. Article 2(2) of the Convention. Limitation of duration of exposure. With reference to its previous comment the Committee notes that, according to the report, the methods applied to limit the duration of exposure are intervention in the case of a complaint, proactive intervention and particular attention to exposure to asbestos. The Committee notes, however, that the information supplied by the Government does not refer to measures aimed at reducing the number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents or to the duration or degree of such exposure, as provided for by this provision of the Convention. It hopes that the Government will take the necessary steps in the near future to reduce to a minimum the number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents (and not only to asbestos), and also the duration and degree of such exposure. The Government is requested to supply information in its next report on the progress made in this respect. The Committee requests the Government in particular to supply more detailed information on chemical agents in the working environment, including in agriculture, and to indicate the steps taken or contemplated to reduce the duration of workers’ exposure to carcinogenic substances other than chemical agents to the minimum compatible with safety. Article 3. Measures to be taken to protect workers and the establishment of a system of records. The Committee notes that, according to the General Workers’ Union (UGT), it is vitally important to raise the awareness of family doctors with regard to occupational cancer, in order to facilitate the establishment of a causal link between a diagnosed cancer and its possible occupational origin, in view of the fact that many diagnosed cancers are occupational in origin but are not regarded as such. In this context the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the fact that the list of occupational diseases, attached to the List of Occupational Diseases Recommendation, 2002 (No. 194), was revised in 2010. The Committee requests the Government to supply comments on this matter and send information on the steps taken to protect workers against the risks of exposure to carcinogenic substances or agents and to establish an appropriate system of records.Article 4. Information for workers. The Committee notes that the UGT states that the question of available information on risks arising from carcinogenic substances is of vital importance, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The UGT considers that this issue should be given clear effect in the national occupational safety and health policy. The Committee requests the Government to supply detailed information on the implementation of this Article, including in SMEs.Article 5. Medical examinations after termination of employment. In its previous comments the Committee asked the Government to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to ensure that workers who have developed an identifiable disease or serious symptom are provided before, during and after their employment with the medical or biological examinations or other tests or investigations necessary for supervising their state of health in relation to the occupational hazards, pursuant to this Article of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s statement in its report that Act No. 35/2004 of 29 July 2004, which implements Act No. 99/2003, has tacitly repealed certain provisions, such as Legislative Decree No. 109/2000, to which the Government referred in its previous report. However, the report does not contain any reply to the questions asked by the Committee. The Committee again requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to ensure that workers who have developed an identifiable disease or serious symptom are provided before, during and after their employment with medical or biological examinations or other tests or investigations necessary for supervising their state of health in relation to the occupational hazards, pursuant to this Article of the Convention. It also requests the Government to indicate the legislative provisions which give effect to this Article of the Convention. Part IV of the report form. Application in practice. The Committee requests the Government to provide general information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in the country, including extracts from inspection reports and, if such statistics are available, information concerning the number of workers covered by the legislation, the number and nature of infringements reported, the number, nature and cause of cases of occupational disease, etc.
Legislation. The Committee notes that the Government has supplied a long list of items of legislation adopted during the reporting period. In order to have a better understanding of the impact of these changes on the application of the Convention, the Committee needs precise and up-to-date information on the manner in which the new legislation gives effect to the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to communicate a detailed report indicating the legislative, regulatory and other provisions, and their relevant sections, which give effect to each of the Articles of the Convention. It also requests the Government to provide answers to the following questions.
Article 2(2) of the Convention. Limitation of duration of exposure. With reference to its previous comment the Committee notes that, according to the report, the methods applied to limit the duration of exposure are intervention in the case of a complaint, proactive intervention and particular attention to exposure to asbestos. The Committee notes, however, that the information supplied by the Government does not refer to measures aimed at reducing the number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents or to the duration or degree of such exposure, as provided for by this provision of the Convention. It hopes that the Government will take the necessary steps in the near future to reduce to a minimum the number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents (and not only to asbestos), and also the duration and degree of such exposure. The Government is requested to supply information in its next report on the progress made in this respect. The Committee requests the Government in particular to supply more detailed information on chemical agents in the working environment, including in agriculture, and to indicate the steps taken or contemplated to reduce the duration of workers’ exposure to carcinogenic substances other than chemical agents to the minimum compatible with safety.
Article 3. Measures to be taken to protect workers and the establishment of a system of records. The Committee notes that, according to the General Workers’ Union (UGT), it is vitally important to raise the awareness of family doctors with regard to occupational cancer, in order to facilitate the establishment of a causal link between a diagnosed cancer and its possible occupational origin, in view of the fact that many diagnosed cancers are occupational in origin but are not regarded as such. In this context the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the fact that the list of occupational diseases, attached to the List of Occupational Diseases Recommendation, 2002 (No. 194), was revised in 2010. The Committee requests the Government to supply comments on this matter and send information on the steps taken to protect workers against the risks of exposure to carcinogenic substances or agents and to establish an appropriate system of records.
Article 4. Information for workers. The Committee notes that the UGT states that the question of available information on risks arising from carcinogenic substances is of vital importance, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The UGT considers that this issue should be given clear effect in the national occupational safety and health policy. The Committee requests the Government to supply detailed information on the implementation of this Article, including in SMEs.
Article 5. Medical examinations after termination of employment. In its previous comments the Committee asked the Government to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to ensure that workers who have developed an identifiable disease or serious symptom are provided before, during and after their employment with the medical or biological examinations or other tests or investigations necessary for supervising their state of health in relation to the occupational hazards, pursuant to this Article of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s statement in its report that Act No. 35/2004 of 29 July 2004, which implements Act No. 99/2003, has tacitly repealed certain provisions, such as Legislative Decree No. 109/2000, to which the Government referred in its previous report. However, the report does not contain any reply to the questions asked by the Committee. The Committee again requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to ensure that workers who have developed an identifiable disease or serious symptom are provided before, during and after their employment with medical or biological examinations or other tests or investigations necessary for supervising their state of health in relation to the occupational hazards, pursuant to this Article of the Convention. It also requests the Government to indicate the legislative provisions which give effect to this Article of the Convention.
Part IV of the report form. Application in practice. The Committee requests the Government to provide general information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in the country, including extracts from inspection reports and, if such statistics are available, information concerning the number of workers covered by the legislation, the number and nature of infringements reported, the number, nature and cause of cases of occupational disease, etc.
1. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in response to its previous comments, the observations of the General Confederation of Portuguese Workers (CGTP) and that the General Workers’ Union (UTG) observes that it had no significant issues to raise concerning the application of this Convention.
2. Article 2, paragraph 2, of the Convention. Limitation of duration of exposure. The Committee notes the information submitted by the Government concerning Legislative Decree No. 290/2001 of 16 November. It notes that this legislation covers activities in which workers are or may be exposed to chemical agents, and that, as provided in sections 2 and 3, and without prejudice to the stricter provisions in Legislative Decree No. 301/2000 of 18 November, it applies to chemical agents classified as carcinogenic. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on how these provisions, relating specifically to chemical agents at work, are applied in practice and to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to also provide for the reduction of the duration of workers’ exposure to carcinogenic substances other than carcinogenic chemical agents to the minimum compatible with safety.
3. Article 5. Health examinations after termination of employment. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in reply to its previous comment including reference to section 13 of Legislative Decree No. 290/2001 of 16 November. This Decree complements the provisions referred to in the Government’s previous reports. The Committee notes that the Government indicates, and the CGTP underscores, that the relevant legislation appears to limit the requirement to provide for health supervision after the termination of employment to the special cases where a worker has developed an identifiable disease or harmful symptom which may have been caused by exposure to hazardous agents or substances. With reference to the provisions in Article 5, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to ensure that not only workers who have developed an identifiable disease or harmful symptom are provided with such medical or biological examinations or other tests or investigations not only before and during the period of employment, but also thereafter, as are necessary to supervise their state of health in relation to the occupational hazards, in application of this Article of the Convention.
4. The Committee also notes that the CGTP contends that only workers in respect of whom the assessment shows the existence of risks will be subject to special health supervision and that national legislation does not provide for specific examinations to assess the effects of exposure but only "normal medical examinations" to which all workers are subject. In response, the Government refers to section 12 of Legislative Decree No. 301/2000 which specifically provides for health supervision of workers where the assessment reveals the presence of risks and to section 16 of Legislative Decree No. 26/94 of 1 February, as amended by Law No. 7/95 of 29 March and by Legislative Decree No. 109/2000 of 30 June, which provides for medical examination for all workers in order to verify their physical and mental fitness for their occupation, as well as the effect of the work and its conditions on workers’ health. The Committee notes that these legislative provisions appear to be in conformity with the provisions in Article 5 in relevant respects, and requests the Government to provide additional information on how they are applied in practice.
The Committee notes the Government’s first report. It would draw the Government’s attention to the following points.
1. Article 2, paragraph 2, of the Convention. The Committee notes that section 5, paragraph 1 of Legislative Decree No. 301/2000, of 18 November, regulating protection of workers against risks associated with exposure to carcinogenic or mutagenic agents in the course of the work, provides for the avoidance or reduction of carcinogenic substances. Section 5, paragraph 2, of this Legislative Decree stipulates that, where it is not technically possible to replace carcinogens, the carcinogens should be used in an enclosed system, and according to subsection 3, the measures set forth under section 6 of this Legislative Decree shall be taken to reduce the exposure of the workers. Section 6(a) and (b) provides for the limitation of the quantities of carcinogenic substances to be used and for the reduction of the number of workers exposed. The Committee however notes that there seems to be no provision providing for the reduction of the duration of workers’ exposure to the minimum compatible with safety. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to provide as well for the reduction of workers’ exposure to the minimum compatible with safety.
2. Article 5. The Committee notes section 16 of Legislative Decree No. 301/2000 in conjunction with section 19 of the Annex to Legislative Decree No. 26/94, of 1 February, as drafted in Legislative Decree No. 109/2000, of 30 June, establishing the system for the organization and the operation of occupational safety, hygiene and health activities, providing for pre-employment and periodic medical examinations, as well as for additional medical examinations whenever significant changes occur in the work environment, and whenever the occupational health physician deems them necessary, which, however, do not embrace post-assignment health examinations of workers, as provided for in Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee therefore recalls that the need to examine workers after they have ceased their employment is due to the fact that the occupational origin of cancer is often difficult to demonstrate, as from the clinical and pathological point of view, there is no difference between occupational cancer and other non-occupational forms. Thus, the purpose is to make a final evaluation of workers’ health and to compare it with previous medical examinations to see whether the job assignments have affected their health. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to guarantee that workers are provided with medical or biological examinations or other tests or investigations not only before and during the period of employment, but also thereafter as are necessary to evaluate their exposure and supervise their state of health in relation to the occupational hazards, in application of this Article of the Convention.