National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Previous comment
Repetition Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Application in practice of the principle of equal remuneration for men and women. Measures to combat the underlying causes of the wage gap. The Committee notes the statistics provided by the Government on the distribution of men and women by sector of activity and also on average wages for full-time work by sex and by sector of activity (per year), which show that the gender wage gap (4.6 per cent in 2014) only decreased by 0.4 per cent between 2011 and 2014. The Committee also notes that in certain sectors where women predominate – such as health and social work, on the one hand, and financial activities and insurance, on the other – the respective gaps were 32 and 23.8 per cent. The Government indicates that the gender wage gap is partly the result of vocational guidance, with men predominating in certain occupations involving responsibility or requiring higher qualifications. The Committee recalls that as wage discrimination cannot be tackled effectively unless action is taken simultaneously to deal with its sources, it is important to address equal remuneration in the context of the more general rights and protections regarding equality and non-discrimination. It emphasizes that this approach is reflected in the Equal Remuneration Recommendation, 1951 (No. 90), which refers to facilitating the application of the Convention through such measures as ensuring equal access to facilities for vocational guidance, employment counselling, vocational training and placement; encouraging women to use these facilities; providing welfare and social services; and promoting equality between men and women as regards access to occupations and posts. With a view to reducing the gender wage gap by effectively combating occupational segregation, the Committee urges the Government to take the necessary steps to promote access for girls and women to education and vocational training in branches enabling access to skilled and better paid jobs, in order to combat social stereotypes of certain types of work as “male” or “female” and traditional stereotypes regarding the role of women in society, and to establish facilities to enable both women and men to achieve a better work–life balance. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any measures taken in this respect and to continue providing statistical information on the distribution of men and women in the various sectors of activity and also on their respective wages. Article 3. Objective job evaluation. The Committee notes the Government’s indications that jobs are categorized according to an occupational classification by type of staff and skill levels, formal qualifications, and experience or vocational training acquired, which determine levels of knowledge and ability for occupying the post in question. The Government also indicates that a description may be included of the nature of the work, autonomy and the responsibilities involved. The Committee draws the Government’s attention to the difference that exists between performance appraisal, which aims to evaluate the way in which a worker performs his or her duties, and objective job evaluation, which seeks to measure the relative values of jobs with varying content on the basis of the tasks to be accomplished. Objective job evaluation is concerned with evaluating the job, not the individual worker. Although the Convention does not determine any particular method for undertaking such an evaluation, Article 3 presupposes the use of appropriate techniques for objective job evaluation, comparing factors such as the skills required to accomplish the tasks concerned, the effort involved, and responsibilities and working conditions in the post or job in question (see 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraphs 695–696). The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to promote, especially vis-à-vis the social partners, the use of objective job evaluation methods, as provided for in Article 3 of the Convention, with a view to ensuring that the principle of equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value is reflected in any methods for determining or revising job or post classifications and consequently pay scales. Enforcement. The Committee notes, according to the information provided by the Government, that pay disparities are not recorded by or reported to the labour inspectorate and there are no legal proceedings relating to this matter. In view of the statistical data showing the persistence of a gender pay gap, the Committee encourages the Government to conduct awareness-raising activities for labour inspectors on this matter. It also requests the Government to provide information on any prevention or enforcement measures adopted by the labour inspectorate to promote and secure respect for the principle of equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value. The Committee also requests the Government to send extracts of inspection reports recording any pay disparities and copies of any court decisions relating to this issue.
Repetition Articles 2 and 4 of the Convention. Application of the principle of equal remuneration for men and women. The Committee notes the statistics supplied by the Government on trends in the average wage of employees, by sector of activity and sex, between 2004 and 2008. It notes in particular that between 2004 and 2007 there was virtually no change in the gap between men’s and women’s average wages across all sectors (approximately 10 per cent) and that it even widened in 2008, rising to 13 per cent. The statistics also show that the average wages of men are higher in all sectors except construction and public administration. The Government further indicates that women’s hourly pay is still lower than that of men in all age groups.In its previous comments the Committee noted that negotiation in the various sectors and enterprises might be one of the topics covered by the tripartite working groups responsible for modernizing and codifying labour law, in which case there would be an opportunity to address the matter of equal remuneration for men and women. ... It furthermore notes that, according to the Government, equal remuneration is not a subject the social partners deal with specifically and that the Government, for its part, has focused its action on local employment because of the economic situation. In view of the fact that the gap between men’s and women’s average wages persists and has even worsened recently, the Committee asks the Government to take the necessary steps, in cooperation with the workers’ and employers’ organizations, to effectively reduce and eliminate the wage gap between men and women for work of equal value. ... In this connection, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide specific information on the supervisory and preventive activities conducted by labour inspectors to reduce remuneration differentials between men and women.Objective job evaluation. In the absence of a reply from the Government on this point, the Committee is bound to repeat its request for information on the manner in which the Government encourages an objective evaluation of jobs in the public and private sectors, and on the measures taken to ensure that part-time work is not underpaid disproportionately in comparison to full-time work. The Committee also asks the Government to continue to send statistical information on men’s and women’s wages in the various sectors of the economy.
Articles 2 and 4 of the Convention. Application of the principle of equal remuneration for men and women. The Committee notes the statistics supplied by the Government on trends in the average wage of employees, by sector of activity and sex, between 2004 and 2008. It notes in particular that between 2004 and 2007 there was virtually no change in the gap between men’s and women’s average wages across all sectors (approximately 10 per cent) and that it even widened in 2008, rising to 13 per cent. The statistics also show that the average wages of men are higher in all sectors except construction and public administration. The Government further indicates that women’s hourly pay is still lower than that of men in all age groups.
In its previous comments the Committee noted that negotiation in the various sectors and enterprises might be one of the topics covered by the tripartite working groups responsible for modernizing and codifying labour law, in which case there would be an opportunity to address the matter of equal remuneration for men and women. The Committee notes that the plan for the modernization of the Labour Code which was to be undertaken in the context of a social pact between employers and workers had been abandoned in favour of a Bill to codify the Labour Code on the basis of existing law. The Committee understands that the codification Bill has still not been adopted. It furthermore notes that, according to the Government, equal remuneration is not a subject the social partners deal with specifically and that the Government, for its part, has focused its action on local employment because of the economic situation.
In view of the fact that the gap between men’s and women’s average wages persists and has even worsened recently, the Committee asks the Government to take the necessary steps, in cooperation with the workers’ and employers’ organizations, to effectively reduce and eliminate the wage gap between men and women for work of equal value. The Government is also asked to indicate how supervision of the application of section 2 of Decision No. 91–4 AT of 17 January 1991 which provides, in accordance with the Convention, for equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value, is ensured. In this connection, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide specific information on the supervisory and preventive activities conducted by labour inspectors to reduce remuneration differentials between men and women.
Objective job evaluation. In the absence of a reply from the Government on this point, the Committee is bound to repeat its request for information on the manner in which the Government encourages an objective evaluation of jobs in the public and private sectors, and on the measures taken to ensure that part-time work is not underpaid disproportionately in comparison to full-time work. The Committee also asks the Government to continue to send statistical information on men’s and women’s wages in the various sectors of the economy.
1. Articles 2 and 4 of the Convention. Application of the principle of the Convention by collective agreements. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the Government’s indication that draft legislation would be proposed to the social partners concerning the application in practice of the principle of equal remuneration for work of equal value by means of collective agreements. The Committee notes that the text envisaged on the application of the principle of the Convention has not been prepared and that, following a proliferation of social disputes, the Government has proposed a social pact to the workers and employers. The Committee also notes that, in the context of this social pact, a tripartite group will be assigned the task of modernizing and codifying labour regulations, and that negotiation in the various sectors and enterprises might be one of the subjects covered by the tripartite working groups, which would enable the issue of equal pay between men and women to be addressed. The Committee hopes that the Government will ensure that, in the context of the social pact, the tripartite working groups focus in their discussions on the application in practice of the principle of equal remuneration for work of equal value, particularly by means of collective agreements. The Committee encourages the Government to continue social dialogue on this issue and asks it to supply information on all measures adopted by the tripartite groups to give full effect in law and in practice to the provisions of the Convention.
2. Objective evaluation of jobs. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that the hourly wage for women was slightly higher than for men in the under-30 age group. The Committee also noted the Government’s indication that wage gaps between men and women were partly due to the greater presence of women in part-time work. The Committee notes that, contrary to the information in the previous report, the Government underlines that the hourly wage for women in 2006 was lower than that of men in all age categories, including for the under‑30 age group. Moreover, the Committee observes that in the sectors where women constitute a large proportion of the work force (education, health and social action, community services, domestic services, etc.), women’s pay is less on average than that received by men as is also the case in most other sectors of activity. In view of this information, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the fact that an objective evaluation of jobs in the public and private sector would make for better identification of cases in which men and women, despite performing work of equal value, do not receive equal pay. In this respect, the Committee refers to paragraphs 138–150 of its 1986 General Survey on equal remuneration, in which it explains the various methods of job evaluation and the use thereof to apply the principle of the Convention. The Committee also draws the Government’s attention to its general observation of 2006, in particular paragraph 5. The Committee asks the Government to supply information on the way in which the Government encourages an objective evaluation of jobs in the public and private sectors. Moreover, the Committee asks the Government to supply information on the measures taken to ensure that part-time work is not underpaid in a way that is disproportionate to full-time work. The Committee also asks the Government to continue supplying statistical information on the wages of men and women in the various sectors of activity.
3. Application of the law. The Committee notes that the labour inspectorate conducts visits to workplaces in order to monitor the application of the principle of the Convention. The Committee also notes that the labour inspectorate informs workers and employers on the provisions of labour law and actively participates in the handling of individual disputes. The Committee notes further that no complaints with regard to wage discrimination have been brought before the labour inspectorate and that no judicial decisions concerning the application of the Convention have been issued by the courts. The Committee asks the Government to supply precise information on the activities and inspections conducted by the labour inspectorate and also on the manner in which the authorities promote the application of the principle of equal remuneration for work of equal value, for example by organizing awareness and information campaigns. The Committee asks the Government to continue to keep it informed of any decisions issued by the competent authorities with regard to equal remuneration.
1. Articles 2 and 4 of the Convention. Application of the principle by collective agreements. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that a draft text will be submitted to the social partners concerning the effective application of the principle of remuneration for men and women for work of equal value through collective agreements, and asks the Government to keep it informed of any developments in this regard. Noting further the salary grids set by various collective agreements for the different economic branches and professional categories, the Committee would be grateful if the Government could provide, as far as possible, information on the number of men and women that are employed in the various sectors and occupations covered by these agreements.
2. Wage gap between men and women. The Committee thanks the Government for the statistics on the average monthly and hourly wages of men and women for the year 2003 according to age. It notes that, while the hourly wages of women are slightly higher than those of men in the age categories up to 30 years of age, the monthly wages of women are consistently lower than men’s and the wage gap between men and women increases significantly with age. The Government explains in its report that the wage differentials between men and women are not necessarily due to discrimination at the recruitment stage but rather develop and widen throughout their careers. Noting that the Government also attributes the salary differentials between men and women to the fact that more women work part-time, the Committee asks the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that part-time employment is not disproportionately under-remunerated in relation to full-time employment. Please also continue to provide statistical information on the wages of men and women in the various sectors and occupations, and on the measures adopted or envisaged to increase women’s participation in full-time and higher status positions, as a means to reduce wage inequalities.
The Committee notes the Government’s report for French Polynesia, including the copies of collective agreements, and it requests information on the following points.
1. The Committee takes note of the indication provided by the Government that statistical information on remuneration, disaggregated by sex, would be published in October 2003 and that this data would be transmitted to the Office.
2. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the number of cases and type of allegations that have been brought to the attention of the labour inspectorate in relation to the violation of the principle of equal remuneration between men and women for work of equal value and the action taken in those cases.
The Committee notes the Government’s brief report for French Polynesia.
The Committee notes that the guaranteed minimum inter-occupational wage (SMIG) was revised to FCFP 627.13 under Order No. 512 CM of 17 April 2002. It asks the Government to continue providing information on the measures adopted for the promotion of the principle of equal remuneration for work of equal value. It also asks the Government to provide statistical information on remuneration, disaggregated by sex, in order to enable the Committee to assess the application in practice of the principle of equal remuneration for men and women workers for work of equal value.
The Committee notes the Government’s report and the monthly wage tables for 1993 to 2000.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication in the report to the effect that the progressive raising of the guaranteed minimum inter-occupational wage (SMIG) to reach FCFP100,000 in October 1999, pursuant to Deliberation No. 96-152 AFP of 5 December 1996, at the request of the social partners, has been complied with and reached the prescribed level in 1999. It asks the Government to continue to supply information on the measures adopted for the promotion of equality between men and women in Polynesia with future reports.
The Government's report contains detailed information concerning the progression in the minimum wage (SMIC) and in wages in various sectors of activity. The numerous collective agreements appended to the report contain salary scales and classifications according to professional category. The French Polynesian Institute of Statistics has also issued extensive data which is appended to the report. In accordance with section 18 of Act No. 86-845 of 17 July 1986 relating to the general principles of the right to work and to the organization and functioning of the labour inspectorate and industrial tribunals, these collective agreements establish wage scales according to professional category based on objective criteria, capacities resulting from experience acquired, responsibilities and intellectual or physical demands.
The Committee notes with interest that the Government's report contains full responses to the issues raised in the Committee's 1997 direct request. The Committee hopes that the Government will continue to provide information concerning the promotion of equality between men and women in French Polynesia.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
1. The Committee notes the Government's statement that there is no difference between men and women workers in relation to wages, either in the minimum wage (SMIC) established by the territorial regulations or in the minimum wages determined in collective agreements. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate in its next report the measures which have been taken to guarantee that, in the determination of wages which are higher than the compulsory minimum wage, account is duly taken of the principle of equal remuneration between men and women workers for work of equal value. It also requests the Government to supply copies of the most recent collective agreements which establish wages above the level of minimum wages, with an indication, where possible, of the percentage of women covered by these collective agreements and the distribution of men and women workers at the various wage levels.
2. The Committee notes the Government's statement that the laws and regulations relating to equality of remuneration and occupational equality between men and women workers, and in particular Deliberation No. 91-004 of 17 January 1991, appear to be appropriately applied. It adds, however, that in practice it is noted that positions of responsibility and high-level managerial positions are rarely occupied by women. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply recent statistics indicating the distribution of men and women at the various levels and in positions of responsibility in the public administration and in public and private enterprises in which a large number of women are employed, as well as information on the measures which have been taken or are envisaged to encourage employers to offer women workers the same possibilities as men in terms of recruitment, promotion and appointment to positions of responsibility.
3. The Committee notes with interest that, by virtue of section 5 of the above Deliberation of 17 January 1991, an order was adopted on 14 May 1993 to establish the list of jobs and occupational activities for which being of one sex or the other is a decisive requirement. It requests the Government to supply a copy of the order, which was mentioned as being appended to the report, but which has not been received.
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
With reference to its previous direct requests, the Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in its report.
1. The Committee notes with interest from the Government's reply to its previous direct request, that the classifications and collective agreements will be updated so as to bring their provisions into line with the Act of 17 July 1986. It asks the Government to provide information in its next report on progress made in this respect, along with copies of the most recent collective agreements.
2. The Committee also asks the Government to provide a copy of Deliberation No. 91-4/AT of 17 January 1991.
Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes with satisfaction that section 18 of Act No. 86-845 of 17 July 1986 concerning the general principles of labour law and the organisation and operation of the labour inspectorate and labour tribunals in French Polynesia guarantees equal remuneration for women and men for the same work or for work of equal value and provides that "jobs are considered as having an equal value when, taken as a whole, they require of workers comparable qualifications, diploma or equivalent experience, ability gained through experience, responsibilities and physical or mental demands".
The Committee notes that the Government's report contains no reply to its previous comments. It hopes that the next report will provide full information on the points raised in the previous direct request, which read as follows:
1. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that job classifications are established by collective agreements in accordance with levels of training and occupational knowledge, without distinction between male and female jobs, and that local orders carry out the occupational classification of workers in the various branches of activity, as necessary.
The Committee examined some of the above orders and noted that certain jobs appearing in the orders are entered in accordance with the sex of the person holding them. After noting, from the Government's statements, that the territory was not yet ready to establish new terminologies for jobs and occupations, it requested the Government to take measures to encourage the social partners to revise the job classification system in order to base it on an objective appraisal of the work to be performed with a view to promoting the principle of equal remuneration for work of equal value, in accordance with Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.
In its last report, the Government indicates that such a revision could be examined within the framework of the tripartite agreement between the territorial government and employers' and workers' organisations that was signed on 10 July 1984. This agreement seeks to create a high-level territorial committee for co-ordination and consultation in the field of employment, vocational training and social promotion.
The Committee notes this information with interest and hopes that the next report will contain information on any measures taken in this respect. The Committee also requests the Government, as it has in t he past, to transmit copies of the most recent collective agreements and of local orders issued concerning occupational classifications.
2. The Committee also notes that the Bill respecting the general principles of labour law and the organisation and operation of the labour inspectorate and labour tribunals in French Polynesia was submitted to the Senate some time ago. The Committee hopes that the Government will not fail to transmit a copy of this as soon as it is enacted, as it stated it would in its report.
3. The Committee also refers to section 91 of the Labour Code (overseas territories) which requires, in order to apply the principle of equal remuneration, "equal conditions, as regards work, skill and output", whereas in the terms of the Convention equal remuneration for men and women workers shall be provided for work of "equal value". (In this connection please see the explanations given in paragraphs 20 to 23 and 52 to 70 of the Committee's General Survey of 1986 on Equal Remuneration.)
The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate how effect is given to the principles set forth in the Convention, particularly in cases where in practice men and women perform work of a different nature but of equal value.