National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
The Committee notes the information provided by the Government on the system in place for the conduct of consultations between public authorities and employers’ and workers’ organizations including through the Tripartite Negotiating Forum and the Wages and Salary Advisory Board at national level. In its previous comments, the Committee, taking note of observations made by the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) and the Government’s reply, formulated comments in relation to the need for adequate consultation with the social partners and the need to ensure the organization and coordination of an effective system of labour administration, including accessible and well-functioning labour courts.
The Committee notes that as a follow-up to the recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry appointed under article 26 of the ILO Constitution to examine the observance by the Government of Zimbabwe of the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98), the Government and the social partners have agreed on an “ILO Technical assistance package for Zimbabwe” which is likely to have a direct impact on the labour administration system and the application of the present Convention by providing for: preparations for a Bill to legislate the tripartite negotiating forum (TNF); capacity building on trade union issues for government officials at the provincial level; strengthening the judiciary, labour officers, conciliators and arbitrators; strengthening the interface between social partners and human rights structures; and strengthening employment policy.
The Committee requests the Government to indicate the impact of the measures taken or envisaged in the framework of the technical assistance package on the organization of an effective and properly coordinated system of labour administration under the control of a central authority. In particular, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would send detailed information on the following:
– the measures taken or activities carried out in order to encourage, at national, regional and local levels, effective consultation and cooperation between public authorities and bodies, and employers’ and workers’ organizations; please also indicate the activities carried out by the Tripartite Negotiating Forum and the Wages and Salary Advisory Board during the reporting period;
– measures taken or envisaged to ensure the organization, effective operation and coordination of the system of labour administration, including access to well-functioning labour courts;
– any plans to extend the functions of the system of labour administration to any of the categories of workers listed in Article 7(a)–(d), including members of cooperatives;
– extracts of any reports or any periodic information provided by the principal labour administration services (Part IV of the report form).
The Committee notes the Government’s report and the information sent in reply to its previous comments. It also notes the observations of 6 September 2005 by the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU), and the Government’s reply to the points raised, received on 28 November 2005.
According to the ZCTU, the labour administration lacks the necessary resources to operate. The staff of the Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Welfare lack the professional independence required by the Convention. Furthermore, the Minister of Labour has excessive powers enabling him to decide on his own issues relating to labour administration, which means that the social partners have no role to play. The ZCTU also indicates that since 2000, the Government has failed to publish collective bargaining agreements as the law requires in order for the agreements to be binding. For many workers, the Labour Court is not accessible because it is located only in Harare. Furthermore, the court is understaffed, which means long delays in the delivery of judgements. The ZCTU is of the view that tripartism should be encouraged in the dispute settlement system and that an independent organ should be set up for conciliation and arbitration because the current system has failed to yield the desired results.
The Government is of the view that the ZCTU’s allegations are too generic and are not based on documented information corroborated by evidence.
1. Article 6, paragraph (2)(c). Inadequate consultation with the social partners. According to the Government, the allegation that the Minister of Labour makes his own decisions regarding labour administration is not borne out by any provisions of the law. In its discussion of the application of Convention No. 87, the Conference Committee on the Application of Standards (ILC, 95th Session, May-June 2006) noted with concern the information submitted on the situation of trade unions in Zimbabwe and pointed out that workers’ organizations must be able to give their views on the Government’s social policy. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate how the competent bodies within the system of labour administration encourage, at national, regional and local levels, effective consultation and cooperation between public authorities and bodies and employers’ and workers’ organizations.
2. Article 4. Organization and coordination of the system of labour administration. The Committee notes with interest the information sent by the Government concerning the Labour Courts, particularly the information replying to the ZCTU’s comments on this matter. The Government states that efforts are under way to enable the Labour Court to reach out to all provinces, citing the example of Masvingo, and that with the appointment of new judges, the backlog of the Labour Court has been reduced. The Committee also notes with interest the organizational chart of the department of labour relations and the budgetary information pertaining to labour administration for 2005. It nevertheless notes with concern that many posts are still vacant, particularly in provincial directorates and national coordination. The Committee draws the Government’s attention to the guidance given in points 19-21 of Recommendation No. 158 on labour administration, and would be grateful if the Government would provide information on the manner in which it ensures the organization and effective operation in its territory of the system of labour administration, and that the latter’s functions and responsibilities are properly coordinated.
3. Article 7. Extension of the system of labour administration. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate whether there are any plans to extend the functions of the system of labour administration to any of the categories of workers listed at Article 7(a)-(d). The Committee would also be grateful if the Government would send information on the action taken on the recommendation adopted by the Government, the employers and the workers in June 2002 to promote cooperatives, referred to in the previous report.
4. Part IV of the report form. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide, in accordance with the report form approved by the ILO Governing Body, extracts of any reports or any periodic information provided by the principal labour administration services.
The Committee notes the Government’s report and the information replying in part to its previous comments. It also notes the Factories and Works Act, as revised in 1996, and the Pneumoconiosis Act. Noting that neither the organizational charts for labour administration systems nor the information on budget allocations for 2002 for human resources and labour administration have been sent, the Committee hopes that they will be forwarded as soon as possible. It requests the Government also to provide all available information on the procedure for the adoption of the labour amendment Bill currently before Parliament together with a copy of the new recommendation adopted in June 2002 referred to in the report, whereby the Government, the employers and the workers agreed to promote cooperatives.
The Committee further notes from a government internet source that, in recent years, the informal sector of the economy has developed rapidly as the formal sector has dwindled. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate the measures taken to adapt the labour administration to the structure of the economy, providing particulars of the manner in which effect is given in practice to Article 7, paragraph 2(b), of the Convention.
Lastly, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply, in accordance with the requirements of Part IV of the report form on the Convention, extracts of reports or other periodic information submitted by the main labour administration bodies and referred to in Paragraph 20 of Recommendation No. 158 which supplements the Convention.
The Committee notes the information in the Government’s first report. It would appreciate it if the Government would provide in its next report further information on the points raised below.
Articles 1, 4, 6 and 10 of the Convention. The Committee notes with interest the Government’s indication that a new Labour Amendment Bill, which seeks to bring all employees in all sectors of economy - both private and public sector employees, including employees in the export processing zones - under one labour administration system, was being submitted to Parliament at the time of reporting. The Committee hopes that the Government will supply full particulars on the progress made in this regard. It would also appreciate it if the Government would provide practical information on the organization and activities of all administration bodies responsible for and/or engaged in labour administration, including the organizational chart of the main bodies of labour administration and copies of extracts of periodical reports published by these bodies.
Article 10. The Committee hopes that the Government will provide information on the number of staff in the bodies of the labour administration as well as the budget allocated to labour administration.
In addition, the Committee would appreciate it if the Government would supply to the ILO copies of the latest versions of all laws and regulations, which are related to the application of the Convention.