National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
1. Tripartite consultations required by the Convention. In its report received in October 2004, the Government indicates, among other matters, that it has envisaged, in collaboration with Business New Zealand and the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU), the possibility of the ratification of fundamental Conventions Nos. 87 and 138. The Government indicates that, after an assessment was undertaken and consultations held with the representative organizations, it was decided not to ratify Convention No. 87 at this time. A report is to be submitted to the Office on Convention No. 138 with a view to undertaking a general assessment of the situation. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of any developments which may occur concerning the possibility of ratifying fundamental Conventions Nos. 87 and 138 and requests it to continue providing full information on the consultations held on the matters set out in Article 5, paragraph 1, during the period covered by the next report.
2. Effective tripartite consultations. The Government reports the efforts made to stagger the sending to the representative organizations of the reports to be submitted under article 22 of the ILO Constitution so as to afford the tripartite partners sufficient time to make their comments. The Committee refers to the comments of the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU) and trusts that the Government will continue its efforts in this respect so as to ensure effective tripartite consultations (Articles 2 and 5, paragraph 1(d), of the Convention).
The Committee notes with interest the Government’s detailed and comprehensive report. It notes that Business NZ confirmed the satisfactory nature of the Government’s informal processes for tripartite consultation, and the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU) had no comments to make on the report. It trusts that the Government will continue to provide full information in future reports on the manner in which effect is given to the provisions of the Convention.
The Committee notes the Government’s report and the information provided in reply to its direct request of 1997. It also notes the observations made by the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU) and by the New Zealand Employers’ Federation (NZEF), which were transmitted with the Government’s report.
In its previous comments, the Committee had noted difficulties in the implementation of certain provisions of the Convention, and particularly Article 2 of the Convention. It noted in this respect the comments by the NZCTU alleging that there was no formal structure or process to ensure that "effective" tripartite consultations take place regularly on the subjects covered by Article 5(1). The Committee had requested the Government to take the necessary measures to respond to the concerns expressed by the NZCTU which regretted, among other matters, the very short response time accorded before the transmittal of the reports to be sent to the ILO. The Committee notes that the NZCTU, with reference to the consultation on the Government’s reply to the questionnaire on safety and health in agriculture which was to be discussed at the 89th Session of the International Labour Conference, reiterates its allegations that the response times accorded were too short. The NZCTU also makes observations concerning the application of Article 5(1)(c). The Committee requests the Government to make any comments which it considers appropriate in reply.
The Committee welcomes the very detailed information provided in the Government’s report and notes with interest the progress achieved in the implementation of the above provisions of the Convention, and particularly the establishment of a new procedure for tripartite consultation welcomed by the NZCTU and the NZEF. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide full information in future reports on the manner in which effect is given to these provisions of the Convention.
The Committee notes the Government's report and the information supplied in answer to its previous direct request. It also notes the observations made by the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU) and the New Zealand Employers' Federation, which the Government sent with its report.
Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes the NZCTU's comment that there is no formal structure or process to ensure that regular tripartite consultations take place on the matters concerning ILO activities laid out in Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention. The NZCTU also reiterates its objection concerning the over-formal nature of the consultations, which precludes real substantive dialogue on the subjects discussed. The New Zealand Employers' Federation, on the other hand, stresses its appreciation of the relatively informal nature of the consultation procedures. It also indicates that, although the time frame for responding to article 22 reports is still tight, the Federation has always been able to provide comment on government reports. In its reply to the Committee's earlier comments the Government states that, as a result of discussions with the representative organizations in September 1996, it has introduced a new consultation process which should give them enough time to reply.
The Committee wishes to remind the Government that the nature and form of the procedures provided in this Article must be such as to ensure effective consultations enabling the representative organizations to comment usefully on the matters set out in Article 5, paragraph 1 of the Convention. It hopes that the Government's next report will inform the Committee of progress made in ensuring such consultations.
Article 5. The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government under this Article. With regard to the application of paragraph 1(c) it notes that the Government simply refers to an earlier report on the application of the Convention. The Government also indicates that it is pursuing consultations on the advisability of ratifying ILO Conventions Nos. 155, 159 and 160. The Committee asks the Government to keep the Office informed of any relevant developments in this area. The Committee notes the NZCTU's allegation that the representative organizations are not consulted other than on the reports to be made to the Office under article 22 of the ILO Constitution, (paragraph 1(d)). It also notes the NZCTU's observation that the Government has still not fulfilled the commitment it made, following the tripartite meeting of 1 February 1993, to engage in the discussions considered necessary in order to determine appropriate consultation procedures on the matters covered in paragraph 1.
In conclusion, the Committee notes that there are still difficulties in applying the provisions of the Convention effectively, particularly those of Article 5, paragraph 1(c) and (d), which are fundamental. The Committee notes from the comments made by the two organizations that the time between the receipt of the reports for consultation and their despatch to the ILO is still too short to ensure effective consultations within the meaning of the Convention. It asks the Government to take all necessary steps to respond to the concerns raised again by the NZCTU and the New Zealand Employers' Federation, and to provide information on any progress made in this respect.
The Committee notes the Government's report and the information provided in reply to its earlier comments. It also notes the observations made by the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU) on the Government's report, which were transmitted with the report.
The Committee notes the record of the tripartite meeting held on 1 February 1993 on the consultative procedures envisaged by the Convention and notes, with reference to its earlier comments, that an agreement was reached between the Government and the representative organizations on the form of the procedures covered by Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention with regard to the matters set out in points (a), (b) and (d). It notes that point (c), concerning the re-examination at appropriate intervals of unratified Conventions, gave rise to particular difficulties due to the large number of Conventions to be examined and the resources that would be needed to examine them in depth. The record of the tripartite meeting held on 1 February 1993 states that, although it was not possible to establish adequate consultation procedures on this matter, the parties nevertheless agreed to the basic features of the process. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate in its next report any progress achieved in this respect and if it would provide full information on this point.
With regard to the consultations envisaged under point (d), concerning questions arising out of reports due to the ILO under article 22 of the Constitution, the record of the tripartite meeting states that it was agreed to adopt the same process as that established for the consultations envisaged under point (a). However, the Committee notes from the comments made by the NZCTU on the Government's report, that the delays between the receipt of the reports for consultation and their transmission to the ILO are insufficient to ensure effective consultations within the meaning of the Convention. The Committee wishes to remind the Government in this respect that effective consultations, within the meaning of Article 2, paragraph 2, are consultations which enable the representative organizations to take up a useful position on issues relating to the matters enumerated in Article 5, paragraph 1. It trusts that the Government will give its full attention to the question of transmitting the reports due under article 22 of the ILO Constitution in due time to allow long enough for effective consultations on the matters covered by point (d).
Finally, the Committee notes the NZCTU's comments on the issue of the financing of training, covered by Article 4, paragraph 2. It recalls in this respect the observations that it made in its 1982 General Survey on Tripartite Consultation (paragraph 170), which noted that "the wording of the Convention, for its part, does not lay the responsibility for the financing of training on any party to the procedures but requires merely that appropriate arrangements be adopted; in particular, it could not be interpreted as requiring the competent authority to assume these expenses to the extent that they are not covered by the organizations concerned."
Nevertheless, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate whether any such arrangements have been adopted or are envisaged.
The Committee notes the Government's report and the information provided in reply to its previous comments. It also notes the observations made by the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU) and the New Zealand Employers' Federation (NZEF), which were transmitted with the Government's report.
Articles 2 and 5 of the Convention. The Committee notes the criticism made by the NZCTU relating to Article 2, concerning the over-formal nature of the consultation procedures followed for the matters covered by points (a), (b) and (d) of Article 5, paragraph 1, and its belief that true consultation should be developed in the sense of the Convention. The NZCTU considers that the procedures that are in force are too rigid to allow real substantive dialogue on the subjects discussed.
The Committee notes that the Government recognizes that, in some cases, there have been problems due to time constraints (for consultations on point (d)), but that it makes every effort to overcome them to allow the occupational organizations sufficient time to respond and for consultation if they so wish. The New Zealand Employers' Federation indicates that, although the time frame is sometimes tight, it has never found itself unable to provide a reply.
The NZCTU also refers to the Government's previous report to indicate that the Government has not fulfilled the commitments entered into as a result of the tripartite meeting held on 1 February 1993 to submit to the social partners a paper as a basis for the discussions considered necessary in order to determine appropriate consultation procedures on the matters covered by points (c) and (e) of the above Article.
In its observations on the present report and in reply to the statement that the NZCTU, although consulted on whether to ratify Conventions Nos. 155, 159 and 160, did not express an opinion, the organization states that the belated nature of the consultation was the only reason for its silence and that, having recently received the appropriate papers, it is considering its response.
Articles 4 and 6. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report and the observations made by the social partners on the application of the provisions of the Convention.
In conclusion, the Committee notes the Government's statement that it is attempting to address the concerns expressed by the NZCTU to ensure that the Convention is applied effectively, with the agreement of the social partners. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide information on the progress achieved in this respect, with an indication of the measures taken to give effect to the action agreed upon at the tripartite meeting held on 1 February 1993, particularly with regard to consultation procedures for the re-examination of unratified Conventions and the denunciation of Conventions.
The Committee notes the information contained in the Government's report. It also notes the comments of the New Zealand Employers' Federation, which concur with the Government's report, and of the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (CTU), which has expressed dissatisfaction with the present consultation practice and requests clearly defined procedures for more formal consultations. In particular, the CTU considers that the new industrial relations system introduced by the Employment Contracts Act of 1991 and a change in government attitudes towards trade unions have affected tripartite consultations under this Convention.
The Committee further notes from the report that the Government has met the President of the Council of Trade Unions to discuss the issue and that a further tripartite meeting is planned to review the consultative procedures. The Committee asks the Government to supply in its next report information about any changes in the procedures concerning tripartite consultation.
The Committee has noted with interest the information supplied by the Government in its first report on the application of the Convention. It would be grateful if the Government would provide additional information on the following points:
Article 5, paragraph 1(c), of the Convention. The Committee ascertains from the Government's report that employers' and workers' organisations would be consulted if ratification of a Convention is a definite prospect, whereas this provision has a larger scope and implies that the required consultations should be held at an earlier stage. It requests the Government to supply information on the measures taken to ensure that, as provided for in the Convention, consultations on the re-examination at appropriate intervals of unratified Conventions and of Recommendations to which effect has not yet been given are held to consider the measures which might be taken to promote their implementation and ratification as appropriate.
Article 6. Please give particulars of the consultations that have eventually taken place with the representative organisations on the opportunity of issuing an annual report on the working of the consultation procedure in force. As noted by the Committee in its General Survey (paragraphs 178-179) the wording of this Article is flexible, and the report required could take the form of a section of a general report, for example the annual report of the Ministry of Labour or the annual report of the Government delegation to the International Labour Conference.