National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Previous comment
Effective tripartite consultations required by the Convention. The Committee notes the reply provided by the Government in September 2010 to its previous request. The Government indicates that the most representative employers’ and workers’ organizations are consulted individually by sending the reports, questionnaires and other relevant documents for their comments. For broader discussions regarding labour issues, consultations are held in the Labour Advisory Board which has resumed its duties since March 2007. The Committee invites the Government to supply detailed information on the content and outcome of the tripartite consultations held on matters listed under Article 5(1) of the Convention during the period covered by the next report.
Effective tripartite consultations required by the Convention. The Committee notes the information supplied in the Government’s report received in September 2008. The Government indicates that the Labour Advisory Board has been inactive from January 2006 to March 2007. Tripartite consultations were held individually with the most representative workers’ and employers’ organizations in respect of matters listed under Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention. The Committee welcomes receiving such information and hopes that the Government will keep it informed of the content and outcome of the tripartite consultations held on matters listed under Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention during the period covered by the next report.
Tripartite consultations required by the Convention. The Committee notes with interest the Government’s statement in its report received in August 2006 that, following tripartite consultations in the Labour Advisory Council, Suriname ratified Conventions Nos. 181 and 182 in April 2006. The Government also points out that the Labour Advisory Council has proposed the ratification of Convention No. 138. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the consultations held on each of the items set out in Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention during the period covered by the next report.
Tripartite consultations required by the Convention. In its report, received in September 2004, the Government supplied information on the efforts undertaken to promote and develop tripartism and social dialogue. The Committee notes in particular that a new Labour Advisory Council has been set up for 2004-2005 and that it has proposed ratification of Conventions Nos. 138, 181 and 182. Parliament has agreed to the ratification by Suriname of Conventions Nos. 181 and 182. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of any developments in this regard and to continue to provide information on the consultations held on all the matters set out in Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention, during the period covered by the next report.
The Committee notes the Government’s report for the period ending 31 May 2001. In reply to previous comments, the Government states that the tripartite Labour Advisory Board had not been active for some time, but a new board was established in October 2000. Since then, a tripartite meeting was held on the items on the agenda of the 89th Session (June 2001) of the Conference. The Labour Advisory Board has proposed ratification of the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182), but consultations on ratification of other instruments have not yet been held. The Committee notes this information and asks the Government to continue to provide detailed information on the consultations undertaken by the Labour Advisory Board on all the issues set out in Article 5 of the Convention, including the frequency of consultations and on the nature of any resulting reports or recommendations.
The Committee notes the Government’s report for the period ending October 2000. It notes that the Government confines itself to referring to its previous report as regards the application of Article 5 of the Convention. However, the last report only provides information of a general nature on the activities of the Labour Advisory Board, but does not contain the detailed information required by the report form on the consultations held on each of the matters set out in Article 5, paragraph 1, on the frequency of such consultations and, where appropriate, on the nature of any reports or recommendations made as a result of the consultations.
The Committee notes that the Labour Advisory Board meets once a month and that it will prepare an activity report for the period 2000-02. The Committee once again hopes that the Government will make every effort to provide in its next report the detailed information which has been requested since 1993 and that it will not fail to provide, as soon as possible, a copy of the above activity report if it contains information on the effect given to the Convention.
The Committee takes note of the Government's brief report which covers the period ending in September 1998 and provides some information in reply to the Committee's previous direct request. However, the Committee notes once again that the Government has supplied no information that would allow it to assess the manner in which effect is given to the fundamental provisions of the Convention, and indicates only that the Convention is applied in a satisfactory manner. The Committee recalls that it has been asking the Government since 1993 to provide information on the application of Article 5 of the Convention, and once again asks it to supply full and detailed information on the consultations undertaken by the Labour Advisory Board, and in particular by the Tripartite Subcommittee for the ILO, on the issues set out in Article 5, paragraph 1, on the frequency of these consultations and, where appropriate, on the nature of any reports or recommendations resulting from them. In this regard, the Committee wishes to draw the Government's attention to the fact that certain subjects (replies to questionnaires, submissions to the competent authorities, reports to be presented to the ILO) require annual consultations, while others (re-examination of unratified Conventions and Recommendations, proposed denunciation of ratified Conventions) require less frequent examination.
1. The Committee notes the Government's brief report on the period ending in June 1997 and observes that it contains no information in reply to its previous direct request. It again asks the Government to provide full and detailed information in its next report on the consultations held in the Labour Advisory Board on the subjects listed in Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
2. Noting the statement that, due to the fact that the employers' and workers' organizations received the Government's report very late, any comments from them will be forwarded later, the Committee trusts that the organizations cited were consulted before the report was drafted, in accordance with the provisions of Article 5, parargraph 1(d).
3. Lastly, with reference to its previous direct request, the Committee notes that the Government has still supplied no answer to the question raised by the Suriname Trade and Industry Association (VSB) concerning the advisability of informing the ILO of the debate aroused by the draft Decree concerning the concept of representativeness in the Labour Advisory Board. Please state to what extent the draft Decree concerns the representativeness of the members of the sub-committee for the ILO, and provide a copy of the text if it has been adopted.
The Committee notes the Government's latest two reports and the Labour Advisory Board's reports for 1992, 1993 and 1994. It also notes the observation made by the Suriname Trade and Industry Association (VSB) on application of the Convention.
The Committee notes that the Labour Advisory Board is consulted on the matters listed under points (a), (b), (c) and (d) of Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
The Committee has still not found in the various reports of the Labour Advisory Board the information required under Article 5 of the Convention; it therefore requests the Government to supply in its next report full and detailed information on any consultations which have been held during the period covered on each of the matters listed under paragraph 1 of this Article.
Finally, the Committee notes that the aforementioned observation by the VSB employers' organization relates to a draft Decree concerning the concept of "representativeness" in the Labour Advisory Board and raises the question of the advisability of informing the ILO of the debate it arouses.
The Committee requests the Government to specify to what extent this draft text concerns the representativeness of the subcommittee for the ILO and to give its point of view on the question raised by the VSB.
The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government on the operation and activities of the Labour Advisory Committee, a tripartite body which ordinarily meets once a month.
The Committee asks the Government to provide information in its next report on the consultations held on each of the questions set out in Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention, and to specify the nature of any reports or recommendations resulting from the consultations.
The Committee takes note of the information supplied by the Government, concerning the application of Article 5, paragraph 1(b) and (d), of the Convention.
It requests the Government to continue to provide information on the consultations held during the period covered by the next report, on each of the questions enumerated in paragraph 1 of Article 5 above.