CMNT_TITLE

In its previous comments the Committee noted the adoption in 1989 of a new Constitution which was to come into force on 1 October 1992. The Committee notes, however, that the transition to civilian rule, scheduled for 2 January 1993, was extended to 27 August 1993.

The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:

Article 1(a) of the Convention. 1. The Committee previously noted that the new Constitution provided for the protection of fundamental rights, such as the right to freedom of thought, conscience, to freedom of expression and the press, the right of peaceful assembly and association (articles 32 to 41) and for the state social order to be founded on ideals of freedom, equality and justice. The Committee noted also that the federal military Government may promulgate constitutional and transitional Decrees during the transition period (Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Promulgation) Decree 1989, sections 1 to 3). The Committee noted the Government's indication in its report in 1990 that the ban on freedom of association and assembly had been lifted as well as the ban on political activities and that two political parties emerged, namely the Social Democratic Party and the National Republican Convention. The Committee noted, however, that only two political parties can be established under article 220 of the new Constitution and were in fact allowed to compete in the 1990 local elections which were the first political elections since 1983. The Committee expressed the hope that the Government would provide information on any legislative or statutory provisions adopted under the provisions of the new Constitution when in force, in relation to the expression of views, freedom of association and assembly, and political activities. Referring in this context to the restrictions on the establishment of political parties, the Committee recalled that the Convention prohibits the use of any form of forced or compulsory labour as a means of political coercion or education or as a punishment for holding or expressing political views or views ideologically opposed to the established political, social or economic system. The Committee asked the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that the persons protected by the Convention may not be punished by penalties which would involve an obligation to work. The Committee had also noted that under the State Security (Detention of Person) Decree No. 2 of 1984 persons could be detained for successive periods of three months (respectively six months following the amendment of the Decree), constitutional guarantees in this matter being suspended, and that under the State Security (Detention of Persons) (Amendment) Decree of 25 January 1990 the successive periods of detention of six months had been substituted by periods of six weeks and a Detention of Persons Review Panel had been established. The Committee expressed the hope that the Government would provide a copy of any Act or regulation governing the conditions of detention for persons detained under Decree No. 2 of 1984, as amended. Article 1(c) and (d). 2. In previous comments, the Committee noted that under section 81(1)(b) and (c) of the Labour Decree, 1974, a court may direct fulfilment of a contract of employment and posting of security for the due performance of so much of the contract as remains unperformed, and a person failing to comply with such direction may be committed to prison. The Committee had noted the Government's indication that committal to prison in such circumstances did not usually involve an obligation to perform work, but that efforts would be made to submit section 81(1)(b) and (c) of the Labour Decree, 1974 to the National Advisory Council for necessary amendments. The Committee noted the Government's statement in an earlier report that the sections in question had been submitted to the National Advisory Council for review and amendments. The Committee expressed the hope that the Government would soon be in a position to report on measures adopted to ensure that no sanctions which may involve an obligation to perform work were provided for breaches of labour discipline or for taking part in a strike. 3. In previous comments, the Committee referred to section 117(b), (c) and (e) of the Merchant Shipping Act, under which seamen are liable to imprisonment involving an obligation to work for breaches of labour discipline even in the absence of a danger to the safety of the ship or of persons. The Committee expressed the hope that in this regard too, the necessary measures would be taken to ensure the observance of the Convention, and that the Government would soon be able to indicate the amendments adopted. Article 1(d). 4. The Committee previously noted that under section 13(1) and (2) of the Trade Disputes Decree, No. 7 of 1976, participation in strikes may be punished with imprisonment involving an obligation to work in the following cases: (a) where the mediation and reporting procedure imposed by sections 3 and 4 of the Decree for all industrial disputes has not been complied with; (b) where arbitration procedures under sections 7 to 9 of the Decree, which shall be initiated by the Federal Commissioner whenever conciliation attempts have failed, have led to an award by the arbitration tribunal and that award has become binding; (c) when the Federal Commissioner has referred the dispute to the National Industrial Court; (d) when the National Industrial Court has issued an award on the reference. The Committee noted the Government's statement that section 13 merely imposed on an employer or worker an obligation to observe and exhaust prescribed procedures before engaging in a strike or lock-out. In this connection, the Committee referred to paragraph 130 of its 1979 General Survey on the Abolition of Forced Labour, where it explained that the imposition of a temporary restriction on the right to strike until all facilities for negotiation and conciliation have been exhausted and while voluntary arbitration procedures were in progress, were to be distinguished from compulsory arbitration systems which result in binding awards allowing practically all strikes to be prohibited or rapidly stopped. When such systems provide for sanctions involving compulsory labour, they should be limited to sectors and types of employment where restrictions may be imposed on the right to strike itself, that is, to essential services in the strict sense of the term (i.e. services whose interruption would endanger the life, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population). The Committee further noted that the list of essential services included in Schedule 1 to Decree No. 7 of 1976 and in section 8 of the Trade Disputes (Essential Services) Decree No. 23 of 1976 is wider and covers for example the Central Bank and banking business. Noting the Government's indication in its report that the provisions of section 13(1) and (2) of the Trade Disputes Decree No. 7 of 1976 had been submitted to the National Labour Advisory Council for necessary review and amendment, the Committee expressed the hope that necessary action would soon be taken to ensure the observance of the Convention in this regard and that the Government would indicate the measures taken or contemplated to amend the legislative provisions referred to.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.